Politics & Government - 20 March 2007

Let me make up a very unlikely situation that won't ever happen (at least in my lifetime).

If the U.S. just happened to pissed off the World so much that even its closest allies (Britain and Israel included) decide to war against the U.S.

And assuming nuclear weapons are not used, will U.S. still be able to win if it were to fight against the ENTIRE WORLD?

2007-03-20 12:21:13 · 3 answers · asked by krndhl3 2 in Military

I pick a topic for my English speech "Should the United Nation be Reformed", yet i must narrow it to two clear side.
So far, I know there is one side that demand for reforms, but the other side?

2007-03-20 12:20:52 · 7 answers · asked by Roster 2 in Government

I don't understand. Why would someone ever want to kill their baby? If a girl was raped or there was a problem with the pregnancy I would understand. But the way it is being used now is like a form of birth control! If you couldn't support the baby you should give it up for adoption. Why in the world would anyone want to murder their baby? When you are pregnant, your hormones are seriously making you emotional. Is that any state in which you should decide something like that? Abortion is murder by defenition: the wrongful or malicious taking of a life. If you had unprotected sex, that is your fault unless you were raped. I just don't understand why anyone would want that for their child who could grow up to be a doctor or a lawyer or cure cancer. Why?

2007-03-20 12:20:21 · 25 answers · asked by maryfairy 2 in Politics

I think judges should be told too get rid of minamim and go with

maximim only. crime would be cut 50%.

2007-03-20 12:19:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-03-20 12:18:49 · 3 answers · asked by ACeLoLo 1 in Military

im english and when i got my 1st passport at 17 they took 3 month to send mine back. and eveything on my application was correct. but these terrorists and others get passports wivout ne delays.

2007-03-20 12:16:52 · 28 answers · asked by mr_fewer 2 in Immigration

I am a new Notary in the state of New York. 3 different people signed something and want it notarized. Can I do that? or, do each have to have it own uniform of certificate of acknowledment?

2007-03-20 12:16:17 · 5 answers · asked by angelique5253 3 in Law & Ethics

2007-03-20 12:15:48 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2007-03-20 12:15:41 · 5 answers · asked by jerryberry 1 in Law & Ethics

2007-03-20 12:15:24 · 6 answers · asked by Wally H 2 in Law & Ethics

Read this:

Bush warns Dems to take offer in firings:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070320/ap_on_go_pr_wh/fired_prosecutors

His behavior sounds fishy to me. Why is worried about a public hearing????

2007-03-20 12:15:24 · 20 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics

2007-03-20 12:14:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2007-03-20 12:13:13 · 6 answers · asked by eviot44 5 in Military

Our schools have been passing and graduating students for years that can't read or write and now their in the work force .

2007-03-20 12:12:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I don't believe in global warming, but whatever happens, its a win-win for me.

If it actually happens, California and the East coast sink, and that takes care of our liberal problem in America.

If it doesn't happen, the libs look stupid.

2007-03-20 12:11:11 · 12 answers · asked by duckkillerdan 3 in Politics

2007-03-20 12:10:01 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Is he affraid He, Rove or even Gonzales will be "forced" to lie?
What are they hiding?
Could all this have anything to do with all the shenanagans BUSH aponitees have been manipulating?

2007-03-20 12:08:20 · 14 answers · asked by Wally H 2 in Law & Ethics

Youve been mindwashed by school and tv news and radio shows and movies and now you think what every president has spoken of as the new world order is a conspiracy. Wow. Mission Accomplished. Gorbachev, Clinton and Bush sr. are best buddies you nitwits and their pinning you against each other so you can fight and they can roll over you easily. I swear if I didnt have the hottest girlfriend to channel my anger thru sexually, I'd put you all in concentration camps, which is where many americans will wind up. While im on the topic, go ahead and check out the hundreds of new camps in america with army gear and all nice and shiny with barb wire turned inside with no one in them and no media covering them. No never mind, just support your candidate, your hillary, your obama your bush or your romney and mcain or giuliani or whatever you want. They are all CFR, illuminati puppets. You like being manipulated thought dont you? Rockefeller was right, most of you shouldnt have the right to breed!!!

2007-03-20 12:07:32 · 17 answers · asked by DwightTheDragon 2 in Politics

Hey, I need help with my Georgia Studies homework. We're having a thing like the General Assembly in our class and I need ideas for laws for Georgia. Tell me what you think!!!!

2007-03-20 12:07:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

ATTENTION 911-KOOKS: I am ONLY asking for a list of kooks who are kookier than 911 kooks, like for example "haley-bop" kooks, even though I dont think they are (or were) kookier. I will not debate "who did 911" anymore than I will debate "who was my mother" or "who was behind the American Revolution".

Of course, you are free to debate whether Hitler ever existed or whether you are the reincarnation of Naploean...your kooks after all...thats what kooks do...just understand that for us non-kooks, there are some issues, the mere raising of which, connotes an entire pathology, making debate meaningless.

I understand 911-kooks dont think they are kooks. What kook ever thinks its a kook? Sometimes you cant even spot a 911-kook until it opens its mouth...although most of the time you can identify it before it speaks.

NON-KOOKS:

Lets make the list and debate which is the kookier, although it will be hard to convince me that there is anything kookier than a 911-kook.

2007-03-20 12:07:04 · 16 answers · asked by PragmaticMan 1 in Politics

If someone was left half of the property with a general warranty deed, and the other half was left to 5 others, which I also have an interest, so I was left 1/2 plus 1/5th. Which way would a judge order to sell?" Can I keep 1/2 or will he order all to sell? I also have had apprasials both halfs equal same dollar amounth, also built my house on one of the halfs. Father inlaw died.

2007-03-20 12:05:44 · 3 answers · asked by mycus2000 2 in Law & Ethics

I started looking around for stories about him, and he seems to be really underhanded and sneaky. After all of his little stunts, does anybody really think that Rove didn't out Valerie Plame? I feel bad for Scooter Libby (kinda).

2007-03-20 12:05:27 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I can't wait, I hope he makes a fool of himself.

2007-03-20 12:05:13 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I'm a Democrat, I do not think it was right for Gonzolez to fire the eight attorneys just based on their loyalty to the Republican party... but at the same time -- he really didn't do anything that was against the rules, much less unexpected. To me, this is just another example of why Bush should have never been elected in the first place. Still, you can't say that just because you don't agree with what he did that he did something against the rules.

Was it disgusting? Yes. Did they break any rules? No.

2007-03-20 12:04:06 · 15 answers · asked by brooks b 4 in Politics

Fox has aired the fake Ad since it showed up on you-tube. It was shown at least a dozen times already on Fox programs and they continue to exploit it. Other networks have shown clips of it but not to the extent Fox has. Maybe it was Fox News that released it on you-tube?

2007-03-20 12:03:36 · 14 answers · asked by itsdabigbadwolf 3 in Politics

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2007-03-20 12:03:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Is this a good non-normative research question for my political sex (gender) class?
I seem to keep coming up with questions that are only
answered by opinions. I am not a very technical writer. I have other questions that may or may not be good, but could use some advice.

Thanks

coryn72

How has the media portrayed women whom have gotten abortions?

How has the U.S answered abortion laws verses England?

How does other states answer issues on abortion differ from the way the U.S. does?

What right does a male have as a father when a woman becomes pregnant with his child?

2007-03-20 12:02:39 · 4 answers · asked by coryn72 1 in Government

I heard this can help in the civilian world, anyway to get one in the marines.

2007-03-20 12:02:33 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

So will Gonzololi be going bye bye?

How long until Bush drops him like a hot potato?

2007-03-20 12:01:51 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I go to Southeren Local and we have a president project. My dad told me that Bill Clinton was not "impeached however I say he was. I would like proff that he was impeached. I thought that he had an affair with a White House staff member. That is what I heard from my teacher Ms.Marquis. Then again she is a little koo-koo.

2007-03-20 12:01:48 · 21 answers · asked by Darh-Luh 2 in Government