English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 22 February 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

2007-02-22 04:29:23 · 21 answers · asked by Alan F 1 in Law & Ethics

More Americans killed by illegal aliens than Iraq war, study says
By Jim Brown
AgapePress
February 22, 2007

(AgapePress) -- Illegal aliens are killing more Americans than the Iraq war, says a new report from Family Security Matters that estimates some 2,158 murders are committed every year by illegal aliens in the U.S. The group says that number is more than 15 percent of all the murders reported by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the U.S. and about three times the representation of illegal aliens in the general population.

Mike Cutler, a former senior special agent with the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (the former INS), is a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies and an advisor to Family Security Matters (FSM). He says the high number of Americans being killed by illegal aliens is just part of the collateral damage that comes with tolerating illegal immigration.

"The military actually called for the BORTAC team, ... the elite unit of the Border Patrol, to be detailed to Iraq to help to secure the Iraqi border," Cutler notes. "Now, if our military can understand that Iraq's security depends in measure on the ability to protect its border against insurgents and terrorists, then why isn't our country similarly protecting our own borders?" he asks.

"We are not five and a half years, nearly, after 9/11, and yet our borders remain open," the Center for Immigration Studies fellow observes. "We have National Guardsmen assigned on the border, but it turns out they are unarmed," he points out. "Their rules of engagement are very simple: if armed intruders head your way, run in the other direction."

This situation would "almost be comical if it wasn't so tragic," Cutler asserts. "If our borders are wide open, this means that drugs, criminals, and terrorists are entering our country just as easily as the dishwashers," he says.

The report from FSM estimates that the 267,000 illegal aliens currently incarcerated in the nation are responsible for nearly 1,300,000 crimes, ranging from drug arrests to rape and murder. Such statistics, Cutler contends, debunk the claim that illegal immigration is a victimless crime. "Then we even have another problem," he adds, "and that's the Visa Waiver Program."

The federal government's Visa Waiver Program enables nationals of certain countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa. According to the U.S. State Department website, the waiver program was established in 1986 with the objective of "eliminating unnecessary barriers to travel," stimulating America's tourism industry, and allowing the government to focus consular resources in other areas.

Cutler says the U.S. retains the Visa Waiver Program because the nation's travel, tourism, and hospitality industries want America's borders wide open. In other words, the former INS official contends, the nation's security is being compromised in the name of trade.

Copyright © 2007 AgapePress -- All rights reserved.

2007-02-22 04:27:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

Government policies in the US and Canada have been changing.
Could a fascist or dictatorial regime form out of 'right' wing Christian ideology and dominionism?

Remember Hitler flew in under the radar.

2007-02-22 04:25:16 · 10 answers · asked by Jamie 4 in Government

2007-02-22 04:18:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

How many instances have there been where a current American president or Legislator have had children in combat. I imagine it is probably less than 5 historically since VietNam. Please give specific examples.

2007-02-22 04:18:02 · 6 answers · asked by gerber baby 3 in Other - Politics & Government

A poll showed most women thought it made her look strong not weak to remain with Bill after he betrayed her. She even went on TV and defended him just to be humaliated.

If this were a non political family, wouldn't people see her as a woman under her husband's thumb? That he can run around on and she has to take it? Isn't that setting a bad example for her daughter?

2007-02-22 04:17:59 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

This salvation army take donations from a furniture company (high end) and sells it to Rent Way, Primetime, and Arrons. who buys this for 50 to 100 dollars and then re-sells it in the community at high rent to own prices ex. $50 TV stand from salvation army resold in Arrons for $1100. I thought they were here to help the community, not to make these companies hurt the community?????

2007-02-22 04:17:12 · 8 answers · asked by lnrtatum 1 in Law & Ethics

Last year our government gave Kellogg, Brown and Root 285 million dollars to detain immigrants and "other projects" including protesters.
If they come for you will you go quietly. Will you let them take your friends and family members.

2007-02-22 04:17:02 · 8 answers · asked by partypooper 1 in Other - Politics & Government

and now look at how brave he is sitting in the comfort of the White House throwing our troops lives away like it is nothing.

http://www.awolbush.com/

2007-02-22 04:16:48 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

I mean can't they just give their word?

2007-02-22 04:15:55 · 23 answers · asked by Dots666 2 in Law & Ethics

Also, wouldn't criminals and terrorists be able to get guns even if ALL guns were banned? How will gun restrictions make us safer?

2007-02-22 04:14:04 · 11 answers · asked by mcmustang1992 4 in Law & Ethics

2007-02-22 04:13:33 · 12 answers · asked by Cindy S 1 in Elections

I'm not saying people shouldn't be able to voice themselves, but when they maliciously paint the president with lies and offer untrue and card stacked evidence of aspects of the war that they are blowing severely out of proportion; shouldn't they face charges of treason and seditition? essentially they are sticking up for the enemy at that poit just for their own political objectives.

2007-02-22 04:13:16 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

http://www.enewsreference.com

2007-02-22 04:12:41 · 19 answers · asked by internet browser 4 in Politics

Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N20239021.htm

2007-02-22 04:09:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

To keep a murderer in prison?

2007-02-22 04:09:27 · 3 answers · asked by Gottlos 4 in Law & Ethics

1. The wider acceptance of ALTERNATIVE lifestyles?
2. Having Illegitimate children and it being so common now.
3. Promiscuity and Abortions on demand
4. Trying to take God out of daily life and our schools.
5. PC in General

2007-02-22 04:07:59 · 55 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

If the British had attacked and killed as many American soldiers as the Americans have attacked and killed british soldiers. Would they still say things like..

Its war dude. Get over it
Sh!t happens dude..get over it

Or would they want justice ?

2007-02-22 04:07:47 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

So, when you join the military, how much leave do you get per year?

2007-02-22 04:06:40 · 11 answers · asked by Chrissy 3 in Military

regardless of shoulda woulda coulda it still happened on bushes shift why blame clinton why not blame bush sr. he was the one hanging out with the osma family he should have no his buddies kid was a terroist

2007-02-22 04:05:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Nonetheless Hilary Clinton being prez?

2007-02-22 04:04:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

Can I get in trouble for this?
If me and this one police officer don't exactly like each other (dated back to our high school days).. and i suspect he's been with my girl, and i send him a text message saying, "you better not be messing with me boy" and he replies, "you better be joking because if your not we might have a problem!" now, could i get in trouble for that? he stated he was on duty.

what exactly can i say to a police officer if i have a problem with him? legally

2007-02-22 04:04:00 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Yes or No? State your reasons

2007-02-22 04:02:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

fedest.com, questions and answers