English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.enewsreference.com

2007-02-22 04:12:41 · 19 answers · asked by internet browser 4 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

It's politics, honey. That's the way it works.

2007-02-22 04:15:04 · answer #1 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 0 1

Yes...This woman has already been bought and sold. Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment...there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his Henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be good at making chocolate chip cookies... but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.

2007-02-22 04:29:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes! Many people say that it is just politics and that this is what we should expect. I don't know about everyone else, but I am tired of politics as usual. It seems that we can never get down to the real issues that matter to most Americans. We have hungry and homeless people all around us. We have poor health care and educational systems for the amount of wealth we have as a country, and we have our prospective political leaders trashing one another. We should hold them accountable not for what they can sputter out of their mouth but what they do with their actions. We should make them run campaigns serving the needy and doing something to make a real difference.

2007-02-22 04:28:24 · answer #3 · answered by afroloves1 2 · 0 0

If she's going to continually play herself as the victim (as in a 'me against the world' mentality), it will simply make her look weak and incapable. It will not play well with the voting public.

And, yes, she was wrong in that tact. Wrong and hypocritical, it wouldn't take much to find a veritable slamfest in the quotes of her supporters (for example, she is endorsed by Robert Ford who claims that Obama would drag down the Democratic party because he's black).

2007-02-22 04:27:07 · answer #4 · answered by S1 2 · 2 0

Her attacks against him and his against her will only increase as the election approaches. They ALL do that. That's the way politics work. They will be best friends again after the election.

2007-02-22 04:16:41 · answer #5 · answered by First Lady 7 · 0 0

One of Obama's prominent supporters attacked the Clintons. She has a right to call his campaign on the carpet for that.

2007-02-22 04:16:35 · answer #6 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1 1

Yep, and the funny thing is she probably helped Obama. I am so sick of that type of mud-slining crap. that's why Obama has risen so quickly. Because people are sick of the way politics is run now. he may not win the election due to his inexperience, but most politicians could learn a thing or two from him.

2007-02-22 04:20:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Excellant question. Why is powerful. there replaced into no reason to vote for it in the event that they felt it replaced into incorrect different than thinking it might value them votes. on the grounds that she is pulling in over $seven hundred,000 from the lobbyist and Sen. Reid is tops for the demos at $900,000 it makes you ask your self. it could be exciting to work out the ruin down on lobbyist. you're corrrect. I recommend you inner maximum on your q/as through fact the hillery human beings might get when you and in case you flow inner maximum they can't. Take care.

2016-10-16 06:12:59 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I am a Democrat who likes Hillary, but yes, she is wrong. David Geffen is the one who made the remarks, not Barack Obama.

2007-02-22 04:15:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No she isn't wrong.. Obama will feel like he has been hit by a buzzsaw before this election is over.

2007-02-22 04:22:39 · answer #10 · answered by Jack 3 · 0 0

Nope - she should not attack him because he didn't say it. Obama is not responsible for everything that everyone who contributes to his campaign feels or says.

2007-02-22 04:45:04 · answer #11 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers