English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

Ahhh! We need to be careful here. I get very frustrated with the Conservatives using important issues like this to pound Canadians with their efforts to condition observers into becomming ridged thinkers.

Lets get past the past for a moment, we can go back and argue about it later if we want to. I think this policy needs refineing. Sometimes the things we learn as with the innocent individuals that have been victomized by lack of thorough examination resulting in torture and so on gives us all a chance to see if we can improve on our old thinking.

Parliment needs to discuss, and perhaps form a special task force or whatever to improve on this thing right now. I don't know if we need to keep it going or just keep it close at hand.

We have been declared a target. Probably due to Harper's take on things. At this point, oil alone wouldn't do it like they are claiming. There was something going before Iraqi parliment (someone please get the scoop on that and tell me if I have this right?) that was to be voted on a little while back that would allow the US to do business, oh, I should say, the big oil companies....how could I confuse them like that?so they could access Iraqui oil reserves. Interesting eh?

We all need to be watching the bread crumbs closly to check if the spin doctors are leading us down the garden path. Show down!

Remember, Harper and his bunch hired an American fellow that worked with US polititions to work with him just before the last election was it? Notice the well trained responses of 'most' of the PC caucus? Sometimes you'd think you were listening to a dare I say it... smacks of mind control, culty stuff, LOL! Lets just stop anyone from thinking about what that other guy just said and replace it with a negative thought about him and his party.

Anyway I am going to take a chance on this one and say no. Who listens to me anyway.

I do vote though!

Hope this one gets some juicy responses. Oh and by the way, way back in the late seventies in Toronto, a student came up to me all freaked out saying he had been approached by a rep from a cell group and didn't know waht to do. What really scared him was that this guy didn't even know for sure who was behind the group! He seemed to feel it was something beyond boarders, not a country or a designated ideology. Food for thought. Do we want to live in a state of constant fear or should we all just wake up and work on ourselves so that people won't be tempted to join these factions?or what ever they are. It is nieve to think that there isn't always someone with another agenda. It will always be that way. So we must work on our strengths and create the best society ever full of happy fofilled people, with great educations.

Here's to caring about the whole human big deal kinda thing. Never give up.

2007-02-22 05:01:22 · answer #1 · answered by Jamie 4 · 0 0

I predominantly pay attention to Air united statesa. in the vehicle, they are much less hateful than their conservative pundit opposite numbers. i in my opinion appreciate the information insurance on PBS and NPR. i think of they have an inclination to be the main balanced. I do examine some articles online, yet i'm consistently skeptical of the media at present. some thing tells me we infrequently get the entire tale and that almost each thing is slanted to the main suitable. Ask your journalist acquaintances (as I incredibly have); they allow you to comprehend that this is the way issues are leaning at present, to no longer the left as lots of those neo-cons might have you ever have faith. yet a junkie, no. A passionate observer and supporter and activist (whilst time facilitates) definite. yet I incredibly have come to the top that throughout the time of spite of the reality that I thrive on being pronounced, there is not any longer adequate political will in this united states (your 20%) to electrify a real substitute in our flesh pressers. So I will never be a junkie till I believe that fluctuate is a threat or perhaps inevitable. ultimate desires, and Tabitha is the two joking or insane. BTW, maximum of my acquaintances/relatives are the two politically in contract or apathetic. approximately 50-50.

2016-10-16 06:13:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers