English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 21 February 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

It seems the debate around Iraq always talks about "victory" and "success." What is victory when we attacked them? What is success other than getting out of where we never should have been in the first place? Why is there is no content for why we actually have real people dying there every day? Is it not clear from the actions of the Iraqis that we are not wanted?

2007-02-21 19:33:31 · 12 answers · asked by dukeji 1 in Military

I mean, it would make sense for the bank PRESIDENT to take the day off, but that's not who I need to see anyway. I think it dishonours the memories of our greatest presidents when people who aren't presidents take the day off.

2007-02-21 19:31:27 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

We hear a lot more about punishment and deterrent, even rehabilitation, but what about revenge?

Some say you should forgive your enemies - nothing annoys them more. There is no revenge so sweet as forgiveness. The only people you should try to get even with are those who have helped you.

Others say revenge is so sweet the Lord kept it for himself.

2007-02-21 19:30:25 · 13 answers · asked by Barbara Doll to you 7 in Law & Ethics

Should they also be deported back to the U.S.A. There are enough child molesters here already.

2007-02-21 19:29:19 · 9 answers · asked by ALL AMERICAN 1 in Immigration

Its my opinion that they are only doing the job americans will not do.

2007-02-21 19:27:28 · 16 answers · asked by ALL AMERICAN 1 in Immigration

BUSH BROUGHT DOWN THE TOWERS

2007-02-21 19:26:16 · 6 answers · asked by all eyez on me19962000 2 in Government

The Vice President of the United States just said that anyone who does not support President Bush is on the side of the terrorists. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070222/ap_o...

2007-02-21 19:25:41 · 1 answers · asked by michaelsan 6 in Politics

Yeasts, molds, helpful bacteria,

2007-02-21 19:20:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-02-21 19:17:48 · 7 answers · asked by jukinblues 1 in Politics

I would repeal our signatory to the so called human rights act -no more fat overpaid foreigners telling us what we can do. Negotiate an exit partial or otherwise from the EEC. Any asylum seeker or immigrant convicted of a serious crime would be expelled immediately (why pay to keep low lifes in jail?) There would be no dictate from any religion telling us what we must or musn't do, if people do not like that they have a choice. Social security must be addressed, the largest growth area seems to be longterm sick; therefore I propose more compulsory regular examinations and the obligation for claimants to attend reassessment training interviews. Teenagers who get pregnant and claim should not automatically think they have a meal ticket for sixteen years, they should have to attend further education lots of colleges have creches these days.Social housing should be given on merit not on the fact that someone can just have three kids and jump any queues Sale of council stock stopped

2007-02-21 19:16:01 · 12 answers · asked by joepublic101 3 in Government

2007-02-21 19:11:56 · 3 answers · asked by mark t 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

Changes of control in the Congress seems that Americans are not happy with the Bush and his party administation in the America and the rest of the world. Many politician and think-tank saying that Bush adminstration is worsing the America's relationship with the rest of the world like North Korea, Venezuela, Iran, Russia and others.

1)What do you think of this quote and do you agree this statement?

2)Any suggestion in what way the America can improve and maintain its relationship woth others?

3)Will the next term of President election will fall into the hand of Democratic members and bring good results for the America and its people?

(Answer from American is welcome)

2007-02-21 19:10:19 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Are they seperate questions? Or can they both be answered together?

2007-02-21 19:08:34 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

In my Opinion no because this men and women are out there fighting for us and alot if not all of them believe in what they are fighting for, but i'm honestly torn on this decision because I understand why people protest, but I wonder how it affects there Moral

2007-02-21 19:06:44 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

For many years now groups like NORML have tried to get people to understand that the laws about marijuana are unjust and that the whole sistuation needs to be reevaluated. Can you think of a process that would show better results?

2007-02-21 19:05:24 · 12 answers · asked by orian76 1 in Law & Ethics

adam smith, as he was creating the idea of an economy also promoted the concept of laissez faire, in which there would be less of a governmental role in the economy. most conservatives in the republican party also believe in the idea of less government involvement. since Bush is a republican and has stated that he is a conservative, i am curious as to why he is running our country with such a strong government hand. clearly laissez faire is not being put to work at all in our current situation and so my question is how would you categorize our current governement and how might we be able to slowly move more into the direction of laissez faire? however, in asking this question, i am by no means suggesting that we should promote laissez faire to the point of anarchy.

2007-02-21 19:04:26 · 9 answers · asked by dragonrayne2000 2 in Government

urgent , please help

2007-02-21 19:03:14 · 1 answers · asked by viren k 3 in Embassies & Consulates

The Vice President of the United States just said that anyone who does not support President Bush is on the side of the terrorists. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070222/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq

2007-02-21 19:02:26 · 1 answers · asked by michaelsan 6 in Politics

I think it is sad when a man can be charged with rape when he is sleeping with his wife , I know he should have enought respect to not push it if she don't feel good or ?? but not called rape maybe a charge of assault ?? what about when a woman is drinking how the hell can you say she was taken advantagge of??? or when they have had a little lovers spat and the man takes her panty's off she says no he continues she don't fight not slap him but she charges him with rape,? men have stood by and let this happen and the ones who say these laws are good has eaten to much soy, meaning he is a female himself, just be honest and forget this P,C, junk

2007-02-21 19:01:58 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Yo I didnt know that the prez is 60 and if that one chick Hilary wins she's 60. Do we want old geezers running the country?

2007-02-21 19:00:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

My daughter just asked me this and I don't know the answer.

2007-02-21 18:55:41 · 11 answers · asked by AustrianAngel 2 in Military

All those who oppose the Israeli occupation are considered extremists

2007-02-21 18:55:30 · 4 answers · asked by DAVAY 3 in Politics

BBC pays highly paid presenters even more money to present the holiday show. Why cann't they ask ordinary families who have never had any holidays or the children who parents can not afford a holiday to go on such holiday programmes. I know they are not professional, but with BBC help they show the same advantages as the next man ,and after all they are the licence payers.

2007-02-21 18:54:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Does not have that right and its not part of their nature. Their loyalty to work and employer is far superior than American citizens.

2007-02-21 18:48:24 · 8 answers · asked by night owl 1 in Immigration

2007-02-21 18:46:43 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I know where im from the mexican illegals have over ran our commuitie, first its was with the picking of our fruits and veggies and know it is there offspring that has overriden our blue collar jobs. I have picked fruit and cut vegs and gotten down on my knees and bleed from a hard days work. Im just wondering if we get rid of them are there going to be any of us that will do that job? Or willing to do that job for the pay that they get.

2007-02-21 18:40:38 · 2 answers · asked by david g 1 in Other - Politics & Government

Which means totally occupying US Mainland + US installation Overseas

2007-02-21 18:38:08 · 22 answers · asked by cool_miggz 1 in Military

fedest.com, questions and answers