English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 17 February 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

I have some friends that think that if we leave Iraq and Afganistan right now that it will stop future terrorist attacks.
When I asked why, they said it would show that we want a peaceful end to things.

Considering the following attacks, along with the September 11th attacks that killed 3,000 -
I'm wondering how many people really, and truly think that if we leave, that it will all stop?

I'm not trying to start an argument, I just really am interested in knowing how many people think it will end, and why?

In 1983, the suicide attack on the Marine barracks in Beirut killed 241 American soldiers
In 1993 the first World Trade Center bombing killed 6 and injured over a thousand
The Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia killed 20 people
The Kenya embassy bombing killed 213 people and injured 5,000
The Tanzania embassy bombing killed 11 people
The USS Cole bombing killed 17 people

Take those into account, along with the 9/11 attack when considering your answer.
Thanks

2007-02-17 10:23:35 · 12 answers · asked by Angry Moogle 2 in Other - Politics & Government

i dont't know how to start and how to organize my speech I'm not against smoking I just need to tell an information ?

2007-02-17 10:21:08 · 2 answers · asked by huseyin m 1 in Law & Ethics

"I'm your top prime cut of meat, I'm your choice
I wanna be elected
I'm your yankee doodle dandy in a gold Rolls Royce
I wanna be elected
Kids need a savior, don't need a fake
I wanna be elected
We're all gonna rock to the rules that I make
I wanna be elected!"

2007-02-17 10:20:28 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-02-17 10:17:09 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I would like to hear your opinons on the subject- if you back them up. I would like to know what you think the reasons are behind the conflict. What is the affect of the Israeli security barrier? What is it going to do to the conflict in the West Bank? I would just like to know more about the west bank and its importance to the Palestinian and Israel conflict. I do not know much about it, and am a little confused.

2007-02-17 10:16:29 · 8 answers · asked by Michael M 4 in Politics

2007-02-17 10:14:25 · 4 answers · asked by Jessterdude 1 in Law & Ethics

How many countries have USA invaded - legally and illegally - and

a) ASKED Nato/Uk for Military help

b) Withdrawn before the mission has been completed leaving UK/NATO to deal with?

Don't bother answering unless you have links to FACTS to back your answer up.

2007-02-17 10:14:21 · 11 answers · asked by Hello 3 in Military

2007-02-17 10:14:15 · 13 answers · asked by itsdabigbadwolf 3 in Politics

2007-02-17 10:08:41 · 20 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Government

They are conspicuous by their absence in the Gulf leaving all other proper armys to do their fair share of the fighting.
And marching bands may scare off satan, but are fairly ineffectual against the advancing Taliban.

2007-02-17 10:06:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-02-17 10:06:01 · 11 answers · asked by John16 5 in Politics

With all the wealth,speed and power they posses,why did they let so many people die???...Tom Science 4

2007-02-17 10:05:45 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

smoke but are subjected to the poisonous fumes dare we go into public) then why is it legal for parents to smoke around their kids? Isn't that some sort of child endangerment or abuse?

Having said that I think of my 28 year old scar from a hernia I got at 8 weeks old due to my bronchitis being aggravated from both of my parents chain smoking around me. I coughed so hard and for so long that my little body got a hernia. Thanks mom and dad.

2007-02-17 10:04:39 · 7 answers · asked by Amy >'.'< 5 in Law & Ethics

...for those who are unfamiliar to it, the 'sus' law was part of the 1824 Vagrancy Act...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sus_law
...but was overused by the police in the major cities in the mid-seventies onwards...especially during the first years of Mrs. Thatchers' government, basically to put fear into first generation Brits, who's parents hailed from the West Indies. It, in fact did the opposite, starting with Carnival riot of 1976, through to the death of a policeman in North London nine years later, with riots in Brixton, Toxteth, St. Pauls and Moss Side getting a look in during that time. Will the police (in 2007), in order to attempt some sort of authority in the troubles areas of late re-apply such laws - stop all black males from the age of twelve to 62 to frisk and ask the usual questions - with a few hours in a police cell if they display 'attitude'; id est...say nothing at all?

2007-02-17 10:04:22 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2007-02-17 10:02:01 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Dark forces or just harmless tambourine carriers?

2007-02-17 10:00:18 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Will these morons actually get anything DONE or will it be back to the future with lots of smoke and mirrors but little being accomplished except for somewhat higher taxes, growing bureaucracies, handouts to teachers' unions, trial lawyers, and enviros and all the rest we've seen before?

What about war, health care, immigration, the coming entitlement / baby boomer collision, global warming, and all the rest. Knowing these losers have no moral courage can we expect them to even address these issues head-on so the country can move forward instead of continually staying stuck in the same place?

"Answers" with nothing but raving about how terrible the opponents of Little Nancy and Ho-Hum Harry are WILL BE REPORTED so, if you've nothing to say, keep it to yourself!

2007-02-17 09:59:48 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2007-02-17 09:57:21 · 18 answers · asked by dstr 6 in Politics

That islamic websites and terorists every where are cheering your efforts in the congress??? Nothing could be more anti-American than debating a war during the war!

2007-02-17 09:55:36 · 16 answers · asked by Chester's Liver 2 in Other - Politics & Government

its a felony charge, will that make it harder to have it transferred?

2007-02-17 09:55:33 · 3 answers · asked by Kammie C 1 in Law & Ethics

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/02/italy-judge-indicts-31-in-cia.php

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArEaus1h5Hhb4rk2vHLO_GDsy6IX?qid=20070217134416AAyJse5&show=7#profile-info-ffc80161d45dca6ace90942f77c44a3daa

2007-02-17 09:53:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I knew they would lose the war on terror just like they lost Nam. I guess we might as well go buy our turbans and burkas.

2007-02-17 09:53:04 · 18 answers · asked by Herb 1 in Other - Politics & Government

Also do you think we should deport all of the one's that are in the US now?

2007-02-17 09:52:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

I have tried the census website and could not find it and a few other smaller ones. I found one or the other but the graphs and/or numbers were not complete. Any suggested websites? Please help and thank you in advance.

2007-02-17 09:52:31 · 1 answers · asked by Chris S 1 in Immigration

Can some liberal nut explain the point of the non-binding resolution? If you seriously believe the war is wrong why not debate funding, etc.? You want points politically for going against Bush, but you don't have the balls to stand for something and take that heat from the American people! Thank you for giving aid and comfort to the enemy and showing our troops how supportive you really are.

2007-02-17 09:52:29 · 7 answers · asked by Chester's Liver 2 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-02-17 09:52:19 · 26 answers · asked by itsdabigbadwolf 3 in Politics

they said she wasnt eligible because she died before sixty five?

2007-02-17 09:51:41 · 3 answers · asked by justsomedumbgirl 3 in Law & Ethics

fedest.com, questions and answers