2007-02-17 10:14:15 · 13 answers · asked by itsdabigbadwolf 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
True conservatives wouldn't be in Iraq in the first place.
2007-02-17 10:18:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I support more troops to win the war and drive out as many islamic terrorists out of Iraq until their government can take over.
The liberals on the otherhand want us to lose, thus allowing the terrorists to take over Iraq and the 2nd largest oil deposits in the world. Which then the terrorists will use the oil money to get better weapons and training and bring the fight back at us.
2007-02-17 18:25:14 · answer #2 · answered by Bunz 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Conservatives support sending more troops to WIN in Iraq. I realize that the concept of winning a war is a tough 1 for libs to understand.
2007-02-17 18:19:33 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What happen to Q&A and dialogue? The bulk of this stuff in USA Politics & Gov just seems to be about venting. What does it accomplish? No one seems any happier for it ... the postings never improve. No one is informing anyone. If anyone even had a valid point sandwiched in the criticism, it would get lost. What a disappointment.
I see Y!A is limiting thumbs up and thumbs down ... removing some of them after placement. I noticed because I check back to see additional answers on some questions today, hoping for some real input and that's when I saw the thumbs up and downs had been removed. It was kind of pleasant actually. It was like seeing a wall freshly painted after gangland graffetti has been removed.
2007-02-17 18:19:01 · answer #4 · answered by ... 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
100 percent...Definitely....with the alternative as Robert Gates and John Mccain have tried to tell you pelosi....ites repeatedly of al qaeda following us home from the cut and run you want...ABSOLUTELY...as a wtc survivor i can say honestly the grandstanding and the cowardice of the presidetntial candidates looking to make quick points at the troops and Bush expense, turns my stomach. If you feel that strongly about the war than why not peition the pelosi/reid regiems to allow the debate on the resolution not to block funding.....
thought so...fat chance.
2007-02-17 18:19:06 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It really upsets you guys that the troops themselves believe in what they're doing over there, doesn't it? Re-enlistment is up. Seems to me that *they* know a hell of a lot more about the situation over there than we do - why do you feel you know more than they do?
2007-02-17 18:21:37 · answer #6 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
its not a civil war..do you have any idea what the hell a civil war is?
or are you just parroting what the media tells you it is?
it MAY be festering but its FAR from a civil war, and as long as our soldiers are there , it WILL NOT escalate into a full blown civil war.. and by their presence, our brave men and women are saving lives!
2007-02-17 18:19:56 · answer #7 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The republicans support the delusion of winning, not the reality of troops being killed for an unwinnable situation of our creation.
2007-02-17 18:24:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no I support sending over more troops to win the iraq war
i think most conservitives do as well
2007-02-17 18:18:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
According to the vote in the Senate, it seems that a good number of them do.
2007-02-17 18:25:36 · answer #10 · answered by Mr Ed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋