Politics & Government - 11 February 2007

It's been 5 1/2 years since 9/11, and there have been none on US soil. Where are the new attacks? Why hasn't the administration shown us any evidence attacks have been stopped? Surely they would have released something, anything by now to prove their position is justified? Why haven't they?

2007-02-11 11:19:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Russian president blasts American policy.
quote

Putin said the world was more dangerous when one country acted unilaterally in foreign affairs. Putin charged that it was "primarily the United States that has overstepped its borders." Its "hyper use" of military force has led the world "from one abyss to another."

He added: "Nobody feels secure anymore because nobody can hide behind the wall of international law."

end quote

my question is:
we should fear The Soviet Union
like we fear them into the past?

Blue good guys Red the bad guys?!?

2007-02-11 11:19:08 · 23 answers · asked by frostycookies9 2 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-02-11 11:17:42 · 28 answers · asked by C A 1 in Elections

With the Democrat's star players all supporting the President, and with key Democrat leaders having had access to the same intelligence reports as the President, how do the Democrats justify their current Anti-War position? Based on where the Democrats started and where they stand now, it would seem more accurate for them to say they believe we have lost and must leave defeated. The distorted view held by the Left asserts that the President lied, even when the most recent investigation shows that the Pentagon simply provided a different assesment than the CIA with the same facts. The history is, most of the World supported action. Only a few supported military action. This included Democrats and Republicans alike - unified. It would seem more appropriate for the Democrats the support the Troops in completeing the dangerous mission they sent them on, not revise the history of their vote, speaking so arrogantly as though they "knew better" and "know best". Support a Vote for Victory!

2007-02-11 11:16:45 · 5 answers · asked by Brian L 4 in Politics

2007-02-11 11:16:35 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-02-11 11:16:22 · 14 answers · asked by meeko6811 2 in Politics

2007-02-11 11:15:38 · 16 answers · asked by super girl 3 in Law Enforcement & Police

I understand that it is illegal in the UK to kill a swan to eat, unless it is for and behalf of the Queen?

2007-02-11 11:15:09 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

DID THOMAS JEFFERSON SHOT A MAN ON THE WHITE HOUSE LAWN

2007-02-11 11:14:31 · 4 answers · asked by deadmoney686 1 in Government

1. Married three times

2. Christians

3. Jewish dog

4. Married his causin (First wife)

5. Was on Saturday Night Live dressed up as a gay guy

6. Believes that gays should get benefits

7. Paraded like a show dog around Israel after 9/11

I support the guy. I will vote for the guy because he will be worst than Bush

2007-02-11 11:11:46 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-02-11 11:11:38 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

2007-02-11 11:09:51 · 8 answers · asked by The Dealer 1 in Law & Ethics

I was a exchange student last year, and right now I am in 11th grade,
The problem is my visa status is J1, and it also means that I am a holder of the student visa and can't work and drive in US?
I mean, I really wanna stay to study in United states...but The program is for 2 years, like whenever I get in 12 grade they are going to send me home,,so please help if you know what should I do?
Thank you!

2007-02-11 11:08:07 · 12 answers · asked by Tim loves YaLl! 1 in Immigration

Evidence points to Cheney as the orchastrator of the Valerie Plame leak. He used Libby and other staff members to carry out these illegal actions making it a felony conspiracy.

2007-02-11 11:08:04 · 11 answers · asked by MICHAEL M 2 in Law & Ethics

2007-02-11 11:07:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I can see this happening. Can't we all?

2007-02-11 11:05:56 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-02-11 11:04:20 · 12 answers · asked by kalibre 1 in Law & Ethics

you dont really think they just went into the savanah and rounded them up do you?

2007-02-11 11:03:01 · 14 answers · asked by whosajiggawhat? 2 in Politics

Forget about Iraq, Iran or China an any of such countries for the moment. Why is the US always silent on Singapore? Our position needs to be loud and clear.

2007-02-11 11:02:51 · 2 answers · asked by Warriors of the night 1 in Other - Politics & Government

2007-02-11 11:01:26 · 18 answers · asked by jdbahmuro1@sbcglobal.net 1 in Other - Politics & Government

...and write laws which government passes which are always in favor of business and never in favor of people, even to the point of putting us in danger.
Why do they trust the government so much when big business runs the show?

2007-02-11 11:00:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-02-11 10:59:17 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

So why are their women vicars. If I wanted them I would have had them!

2007-02-11 10:58:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2007-02-11 10:56:16 · 15 answers · asked by chicken 3 in Military

2007-02-11 10:56:13 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2007-02-11 10:55:55 · 11 answers · asked by nasatiani 3 in Politics

Activist judges have been circumventing the proper checks and balances, writing public policy that hasn't been approved by the legislature. Recently it has been by allowing gay marriages, just because laws protecting the sanctity of marriage are "unconstitutional".
But the problem with activist judges is a lot older than the gay marriage issue. For example, a judge in Worcester, Mass heard a case between a slave and his master in 1783. He ruled that slavery was not legally sanctioned in the state of Massachusetts, so all slaves in the state were free. So just because there wasn't technically any law authorizing the sale of humans into permanent servitude, this lone, activist judge cheated hundreds of law-abiding citizens out of their property! Instead of letting the voters decide, through their duly elected representatives in Congress - which they did a mere 80 years later.
What else will these activist judges decide is "unconstitutional"?

2007-02-11 10:53:51 · 16 answers · asked by abram.kelly 4 in Politics

in general does the indian government have hte interests of your region in mind?

if you are from indiana, please dont answer this question.

2007-02-11 10:53:06 · 2 answers · asked by rostov 5 in Government

2007-02-11 10:52:24 · 5 answers · asked by Slim W 1 in Politics

2007-02-11 10:52:16 · 17 answers · asked by Laura 1 in Law & Ethics