Evidence points to Cheney as the orchastrator of the Valerie Plame leak. He used Libby and other staff members to carry out these illegal actions making it a felony conspiracy.
2007-02-11 11:08:04 · 11 answers · asked by MICHAEL M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
He can't be indicted unless he is first impeached. Impeachment would take up a lot of valuable time in Congress that is needed to sort out the mess Bush and Cheney have made, and to try and constrain them from doing more damage, like going to war with Iran.
So - as tempting as putting Cheney behind bars may be, I hope the Dems ignore that and concentrate on the things that can make our country secure and strong again. Bush and Cheney are slimeballs and have dragged our once-great nation down into the mud with them. We need strong leadership to bring it back to where we all want it to be; and we can't afford the distraction of an impeachment hearing.
2007-02-11 11:13:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
here is the rundown in this Re-Puke admin: Bush is unsophisticated a touch polite be conscious for moron. Cheney a mystifying Satanic strategies at the back of each unwell this usa is suffering, from the runaway value of potential to the mess this administration has engineering in the Mideast. Now that the shiet hit the fan , the Repuke congressmen are backing off helping the white domicile .
2016-10-01 23:48:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If evidence points to Cheney...yes he should be indicted. Cheney is the same as everybody else in this country, he breaks the law he will have his day in court.
2007-02-11 11:15:51 · answer #3 · answered by C A 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he should not be indicted. Even if he would be charged or convicted of anything, President Bush will pardon him.
Keep in mind that Bush probably won't go as far as selling pardons like Slick Clinton (and his dingbat brother Roger) did in his final days, however, you can expect pardons to flow.
2007-02-11 11:12:34 · answer #4 · answered by P W 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely.
2007-02-11 11:12:07 · answer #5 · answered by pelister56 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's only a matter of time.
Sure makes the "blue dress scandal" seem like a Disney movie in comparison doesn't it?
Every parent of every American soldier who has died needlessly in Iraq should be outraged - as should every other American.
2007-02-11 11:11:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There was no crime. There was no leak. Libby is being charged with giving false testimony, not leaking anything.
Know what you are talking about
2007-02-11 11:16:06 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am sure some of us are thinking of some answers that can't be posted here. If only he can't find the batteries for his ....er.
2007-02-11 11:23:42 · answer #8 · answered by Yafooey! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he committed treason.
PW, when, exactly was Roger Clinton President???
2007-02-11 11:14:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Trial is not over. How do you know the results already/
Are you bias???
2007-02-11 11:49:26 · answer #10 · answered by Brick 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋