It's been said recently that if the U.S. congress were to cut funding to the Iraq War, it would be political suicide. But for who? Couldn't the congress cut off all funding, with the exception of funds needed to get the troops back home? If this were done, then Bush's only option would be to winthdraw all troops at once. If he didn't, wouldn't it be his political suicide. In failing to do so he would be putting the troops at risk. Because if this were done, it would rest with the President to take the action that would prevent any unnecessary harm to troops. The nations elected representitives would have spoken, and Bush would be forced to comply. Otherwise he would be put soldiers in a more dangerous position then they are in now. And why should the war continue? It's not even the same war that it was 4 years ago. The Iraq military was destroyed, Saddam was removed, and WMDs (or the lack thereof) were dealth with. That was the war that was supported. That war is over.
2007-01-09
17:15:00
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Zezo Zeze Zadfrack
1
in
Politics