Bush invaded Iraq on the lie that there is WMD in Iraq and finally admitted that they couldn't find any. Instead of apologizing for destroying their country now he is creating reasons that could justify the war, like Saddam's removal from power, installing democracy etc.etc.
2007-01-09 16:56:53 · 14 answers · asked by inin 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have never heard of a fascist apologizing. That is against their oath and creed. These guys have no guilt, shame, remorse, or conscience of any kind as they pursue their goals of plunder and Dominion. They laugh all the way to the Bank of Dubai.
2007-01-09 17:05:22 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
It has been acknowledged plenty that there was misinformation on WMDs. However, I do remember CNN covering the Dutch troops south-west of Baghdad who found the chemical suits and the crates of atropine vials and syringes. There is nerve or mustard gas somewhere and lots of it. Do you remember that
the Iraqi airforce jets were buried in the desert, but protected and ready to go? The Russians had a whole convoy of semis moving west prior to and our military was coming out of Kuwait.
No one has ever proved what they were carrying. It wasn't the treasures of the museum, which have since turned up, after being kept in safe keeping in Iraq. If Syria and the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon couold be searched, I think that there would be some interesting findings!
2007-01-10 01:08:19 · answer #2 · answered by Susan M 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why, because terrorists are car bombing civilians? Or removing Saddam from power and bringing Democracy for Iraq. So what exactly should he be apologizing for?
2007-01-10 01:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Your bitterness over Bush makes you look petty and childish. Get over it. All Liberals have in their arsenal is the tired rhetoric of how much they dislike Bush. A bunch of radical Islamists attacked our country and we are fighting back. What is so difficult to understand about that? If Clinton were in the White House would you be asking for his head too? The answer to that is NO. Clinton would have understood their pain and then sat on his hands. So please find another argument. Because yours is getting really old really fast
2007-01-10 01:06:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Nah we should have mopped the floor with them back in 91 this would have been over by now
2007-01-10 01:01:29 · answer #5 · answered by lethander_99 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
He should apologize for misleading the world or being mistaken about WMD's but not for freeing the country form an insane dictator.
2007-01-10 01:01:17 · answer #6 · answered by bunnydlh 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I think many Iraquis, are very thankful to Bush for all he has done, and has tried,and is still trying to do. The people who should really be apologizing to them, (not Bush), never will.
2007-01-10 01:01:25 · answer #7 · answered by oceansnsunsets 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
NO...why should he. Did al Queada apologize after 9/11?
2007-01-10 01:01:46 · answer #8 · answered by chole_24 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
What democracy in Iraq? I see a Civil War.
2007-01-10 01:00:30 · answer #9 · answered by SatanicYoda 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Bush has a lot of apologizing to do. Let's start with America.
2007-01-10 01:01:33 · answer #10 · answered by Morey000 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋