English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 2 November 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

We move home last year and the old house was given to a estate agent to rent.
Now my ex-neighbour keeps phoning me because of what their new neighbour does.
She (the ex-neighbour) calls me if they park their car in front of her house or things like that. Once she rang because they had installed a sky dish which was obstructing her window.

I've told her many times that it was nothing to do with me anymore as she has to speak with estate agent. Am i correct?

What else can i do? Is there any law or website that says that is not my problem anymore? At the moment i'm just ignoring her phone calls but i want her to stop calling me....

Please advice me!What shall i do???

2006-11-02 22:32:33 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-11-02 22:31:37 · 8 answers · asked by Alice G 1 in Immigration

DON'T TELL ME IF IT'S RIGHT OR WRONG, THAT IS NOT MY QUESTION! I WOULDN'T DO IT ANYWAY!

I am just curious if, legally speaking, you can get your infant tattooed... because it seems to me that if you can get your babies ears pierced, or get him circumcised, why not tattooed? And yet, it seems so wrong... so it makes me really wonder if it would be legal to do so.

If piercing is not child abuse, what is?

If circumcision isn't, what is?

I don't need answers to those questions, I want to illustrate my point that I'm not looking for the moral aspect of this, because it's obvious. I read another answer for the same question and all people said was "Why would you want to do that? That's sick!" "No, you shouldn't!" and the like. THAT'S NOT WHAT I WANT TO KNOW.

IS IT LEGAL?

2006-11-02 22:30:56 · 9 answers · asked by FastFoodKnight 3 in Law & Ethics

2006-11-02 22:29:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-11-02 22:28:17 · 8 answers · asked by shark b 1 in Military

If I am renting a house from my ex partner, who is also the father of my son?

2006-11-02 22:27:21 · 8 answers · asked by emma j 2 in Law & Ethics

i'm italian, i wish to live in netherlands...is hard?!how to find an house and a job?some documents required?

2006-11-02 22:23:18 · 7 answers · asked by skapiter 3 in Immigration

An armed "career" criminal has been shot dead by armed police.

I presume that this officer will now spend time being investigated for his actions-Why?he has carried out the job that I am helping to pay him for.He should be given a comendation not condemnation.

Am I the only person who could not give a toss about the death of a criminal?
anyone who is setting out to commit a crime whilst in posession of a gun is doing so with the intent of threatening or killing civilians.
The police should not give such people the chance to use their guns,these criminals want to live by the gun-let them die by the same means.

2006-11-02 22:17:48 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

because after all they are apparently USA number one allie so they should be helping fight this war like all the other countries that stuck by the USA when it was needed.We didnt need to go to war but we did it to help USA do you think Isreal will return the favour.

2006-11-02 22:17:23 · 6 answers · asked by molly 7 in Military

2006-11-02 22:17:14 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

Does the law provide provisions, or rules , or rights or remedies to provide for 'pro per' respondant/defendants, equal protection
under the law in civil actions where the plaintiff lawyers have specialized
knowlwdge, and where the pro per has little to none?
Specifically, where the respondant/defendant, does't know and isn't told that
a memorandum is required in answer to plaintiff's motion for summary judgement,
and that failing to meet specific requirements of such returns or responses will
most likely result in judgement against them and in favor of the plaintiff?

2006-11-02 22:16:02 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-11-02 22:14:51 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

will they commit suicide once weed and same sex marriage are legal? lol

2006-11-02 22:13:38 · 12 answers · asked by JIVE TURKEY 2 in Politics

Does the law provide provisions, or rules , or rights or remedies where 'pro per' respondant/defendant to recieve equal protection
under the law in civil actions where the plaintiff lawyers have specialized
knowlwdge, and where the pro per has little to none?
Specifically, where the respondant/defendant, does't know and isn't told that
a memorandum is required in answer to plaintiff's motion for summary judgement,
and that failing to meet specific requirements of such returns or responses will
most likely result in judgement against them and in favor of the plaintiff?

2006-11-02 22:11:21 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I want to know about the advantages and disadvanteges of carrying guns-I need different accidents about the wrong usage of a gun-I want to know why should or shouldn't a normal citizen carry a gun and I need at least 3 great reasons

2006-11-02 22:09:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I'm not a fan of hers, but it baffles me that she inspires such strong hatred from conservatives. Is it just because she's Bill's wife. She's really not even that far to the left. Hell, as far as I can tell, with some minor adjustments she could run as a republican. What's this all about?

2006-11-02 22:06:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-11-02 22:06:27 · 6 answers · asked by robert O 1 in Military

It is to be used as a sorce of information for an informative essay on the Invasion of Iraq.
I need it right now.Someone please help.
Please write your email address in the answer so I can contact the person.

2006-11-02 22:00:12 · 1 answers · asked by Question 2 in Military

There's recently been a campaign in the UK warning men that a woman isn't able to give consent to sex if she is intoxicated. However, if a woman has sex with a man who is drunk, isn't he unable to give consent, and thus a rape has been commited?

2006-11-02 21:59:26 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

repeatedly charged or can any person for that matter hold the state responsable?

2006-11-02 21:54:21 · 2 answers · asked by cheryl asl1 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-11-02 21:42:42 · 14 answers · asked by jo k 3 in Other - Politics & Government

One more thing,does anyone know why term limits went from no limits to two? Does it help or hurt,in your opinion?

2006-11-02 21:39:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

How come over the last decade the people of the United States are having to try and figure out the lesser of two, three, four evils? Name some good ones if you can. Please explain why you think they are good. I ask this question in the political room and didn't get any answers. Only bashing.

2006-11-02 21:26:12 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

considered an unlawful search if they go beyond that area?, and if so is that for all states or which states? i mean if they don't find anything how can there then be probable cause to search the rest?

2006-11-02 21:24:37 · 4 answers · asked by cheryl asl1 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

First and foremost, Democracy is not an american invention. Even Plato was not especially fond of democracy when since his point of view it uses rhetoric and persuasion to govern. Moreover I would say most of current democratic countries use sofisms as the main form to persuade their citizens. Sometimes its obvious, just like in this case in which its also easily seen one of the main shortcomings of democracy. Invade a country with a false excuse, remain there, "say you are doing something good because you are helping them turning into a democracy" --> OMG this is a brain fart, a nonsense how in the hell do you pretend to make someone remain being democrat democratically. You can take that to many other points and still applicable. Democracy is acceptable if the population is not a bunch of idiots otherwise it turns into a disaster as it is the case. Btw there r idiots in both sides otherwise it would have been called Invasion of Iraq, with that in mind it might have even been a succes

2006-11-02 21:24:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

2006-11-02 21:20:22 · 9 answers · asked by vijay r 1 in Politics

Margaret Beckett serves as the British Foreign Secretary. This is ranked as one of the top 3 jobs in the British Government.

Can anyone tell me what skills she brings to this position? She can't seem to give a straight answer to any question, is too afraid to say anything without Blair's approval and looks out of her depth.

For example, when Israel invaded Lebanon, it was her role to represent Britain and try to resolve the conflict to stop the mass killing. What did she do? She took her caravan to France and had a vacation.

She also looks a mess - she's the worst dressed person in the world. It all adds to the bad impression.

Am I being harsh, or should we expect more from someone with a fully expensed chauffeured car, a free grace & favour home fully paid for by us, a large salary & six figure expenses account?

Your views please..........

2006-11-02 21:20:14 · 14 answers · asked by Cracker 4 in Other - Politics & Government

fedest.com, questions and answers