Politics & Government - 19 October 2006

someone that actually exsist

2006-10-19 16:25:56 · 15 answers · asked by Thrash and Destroy 1 in Other - Politics & Government

for example if you were born at home, writing your parents names in the bible as well as yours to be used to get a birth certificate?

2006-10-19 16:24:44 · 8 answers · asked by saulrosenburg69 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-10-19 16:21:59 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Doesn't this seem hypocritcal? On one end they oppose abortion on the premise that only God can create/destroy a life and then on the other end they state that is acceptable as a cilvilized society to kill prisoners, even though our justice system has proven tiem and again it is not fault free?

If we take their argument on abortion, then shouldn't we let God decide what to do with the inmates?

2006-10-19 16:21:32 · 28 answers · asked by dtshaff 3 in Law & Ethics

Since somebody in La La Liberal Land watched CNN one night while stoned and heard the catchy term NeoCon I see it tossed around by the half bright angry left career students in a derogatory manner. Well Libs here's your chance to show the world why those 9 years you spent in college were actually worth Mummy and Daddy's fortune. Please give me your definitions and two examples of each.

2006-10-19 16:21:08 · 11 answers · asked by Jim from the Midwest 3 in Politics

in order to read or watch something that makes outragous claims, and blindly believe them, without looking into seeing how accurate it is, or seeing if they have been disproved?

For instance, i still see people with the 9/11 conspiracy theories and michael moore fans, when there are websites and videos that disprove them (which can easily be verified factually, if you search the web)

for the 9/11 conspiracy believers
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

for the michael moore love groupies
http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm

2006-10-19 16:19:33 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

If they catch me walking out with twenty shirts, I would get charged with theft over five hundred dollars... when all they would have been out is a hundred bucks if I'd gotten away with it. Why is that?

2006-10-19 16:19:29 · 7 answers · asked by eantaelor 4 in Law & Ethics

hussein or bush.

2006-10-19 16:19:15 · 11 answers · asked by the B, kid @sbcglobal.net 2 in Elections

just curious
thank god i live in canada

2006-10-19 16:16:59 · 22 answers · asked by Kelly Bundy 6 in Elections

Hey, Neocons! Are Your Republican Party Members are a BUNCH OF TRAITORS? (Will you send Ann Coult.r to bite their necks?)

"What’s the matter with Kansas Republicans?"

In a state where Bush captured over 60 percent of the vote in 2004, a revolution is taking place, with 9 Republicans running as Democrats in state elections. Its ripples may be spreading throughout the country.

For example, in South Carolina, Republican candidate Barnie Giese, has decided to become a Democrat. Even NBA Hall of Famer Charles Barkley has switched teams.

Another prominent ex-Republican to run for office as a Democrat this year is Jim Webb, the nominee for Senate in Virginia.

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11804

Hey, Dems, should Republican use their favorite term "Cut and Run"-- on themselves? What say you?

2006-10-19 16:14:17 · 11 answers · asked by Reba K 6 in Elections

some represntatives thought that the general population was to ignorant to decide for themselves who should be in office and were for a king, while others wanted the people to vote as to who would rule over them. I am proud to be a democtrat and to live in a democratic society where my opinion counts and I thank God for that privellage!!!!!!!!

2006-10-19 16:13:17 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I had heard rumors about this before but I have heard the movie "America From Freedom to Fascism" explained this in great detail. It basically sounds like nothing in the constitution allows for the IRS to tax personal income.

IRS typically says it is the 16th amendment that allows them to tax personal income, but multiple supreme court rulings have said the 16th amendment does not allow for any new types of tax, so personal income tax is still illegal.

Apparently many people have stopped paying federal income tax and have been acquitted in the courts because the IRS can not site what laws require people to file income tax each year and to pay personal income tax.

Multiple ex-IRS employees were interviewed who all confirmed they spent lots of time and research trying to find such a law only to discover there is none.

While it is apparently illegal to file a false tax return, there is apparently no law requiring you to file a return in the first place.

2006-10-19 16:12:43 · 5 answers · asked by Jeremy M 1 in Law & Ethics

That the Bush administration disregards what the highest judicial power said with such controversial laws as the Military Commissions Act?

2006-10-19 16:12:37 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2006-10-19 16:12:23 · 9 answers · asked by nav 1 in Politics

Some body wrote Today on this Forum that some one is buying big farm in some south American Country.

2006-10-19 16:11:57 · 5 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-10-19 16:11:13 · 21 answers · asked by Peter F 1 in Government

2006-10-19 16:09:16 · 14 answers · asked by AMERICA #1 1 in Politics

try to put in at least where you from so that i know whos point of view im getting

2006-10-19 16:07:35 · 11 answers · asked by Dude.what.does.mine.say 1 in Civic Participation

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6oAeK1dlHs&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=9

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite

A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made $4 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

2006-10-19 16:06:26 · 8 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5 in Government

No i aint an african, but i have epilepsy and i need to know about the driving i havent had a seizure in over 7 Years but they wont let me drive althouth the law has no restrictions after not having a seizure for 7 years. I WANT TO DRIVE. The reason why i cant is because they will not issue me a kentucky license. Can i take legal action AND DONT GIVE ME **** THIS IS ******* DISCRIMINATION!

2006-10-19 16:05:32 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Why do Redsters gravitate towards insanity?

2006-10-19 16:04:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

For example, "Vote Yes for Prop 201" may mean no smoking will be allowed in any public facility if the prop passes.

2006-10-19 16:04:36 · 3 answers · asked by Ya'at'eeh 2 in Elections

Published on Thursday, September 28, 2006 by TruthDig

Habeas Corpus, R.I.P. (1215 - 2006)

With a smug stroke of his pen, President Bush is set to wipe out a safeguard against illegal imprisonment that has endured as a cornerstone of legal justice since the Magna Carta.

by Molly Ivins

story
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0928-20.htm

2006-10-19 16:04:23 · 8 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5 in Government

We are already seeing a civil war building - this from the Washington Post : Senior figures in both parties are coming to the conclusion that the Bush administration will be unable to achieve its goal of a stable, democratic Iraq within a politically feasible time frame. Agitation is growing in Congress for alternatives to the administration's strategy of keeping Iraq in one piece and getting its security forces up and running while 140,000 U.S. troops try to keep a lid on rapidly spreading sectarian violence.

2006-10-19 16:04:12 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

The United Nations appears, to me, to be at best ineffectual. Not only that, but every time I listen to their broadcasts, they call on the U.S. to fix everything, send more money, go in and police war torn areas, but then get all indignant when the U.S. actually does do something. My opinion is that we should withdraw from the U.N., withdraw our support from the U.N. and give them 48 hours to vacate our country - but I know that's just a knee jerk reaction to the continual U.S. bashing going on in there. What is you opinion?

2006-10-19 16:03:59 · 8 answers · asked by padwinlearner 5 in Politics

2006-10-19 16:02:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

Will the mainstream members seperate themselves from the secular progressives?

2006-10-19 16:02:00 · 5 answers · asked by MEL T 7 in Politics

Who was the mayor of NYC before Gulliani?

2006-10-19 15:59:48 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

We feel that our trustee organization has become unstrustworthy, and that the "manager" of our building (why does a condo have a manager anyway?) has let the power go to his head. He treats people rudely, ignores genuine tenant issues in favor of less imperitive proposals put for by the Turstees. Even thogh owners are told they can attend the monthly meetings, we are frequently asked to leave - and then, made fun of (per our inside sources) by the property manager and some of the trustees. Our e-mails about valid concerns go unanswered by the trustees or the manager.
The question is: can we do a "vote of no confidence" and get the manager removed? Is this provided for in Roberts Rules of Order? If we needed to get an atty for this type of this - what typs of attorney would handle this issue? (We are in Quincy - right south of Boston MA)

2006-10-19 15:59:25 · 5 answers · asked by BugGurl 3 in Law & Ethics

troops out of uniform used to be shot when captured. why not shoot those who claim no country?

2006-10-19 15:59:08 · 15 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Other - Politics & Government