Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.
FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6oAeK1dlHs&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=9
EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7
Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=
Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=
MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made $4 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
2006-10-19 18:12:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joe_Pardy 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
although I know that the government has done some very dispicable things I do not believe that anyone in our government had anything to do with the destruction of the wtc other than ignoring information regarding it. I could go on and on about proven, documented things just as wrong as what you are speculating, but I won't the wtc is not a typical steel frame building. You can easily find the way it was designed on the web. It was built like a steel tube and the floors kept it from bowing out and falling straight down as it did on 9/11.
2006-10-19 23:31:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will hope you do agree planes hit the twin towers and caused them to crash.
Building 7 is different and needs to be seperated form the terrorist attack on the towers.
First understand it was seriously damaged, Next remember there was no power, not even emergancy back up for the building, and it was not going to be available for some time.
Next remember it contained a secret government bunker and had alot of government storage there also.
So if you are those that beleive the aliens from UFO's or the secert of the time tunnel or the secret of the new world order, so what ever you wish to beleive ( maybe secret bio labs with things that could kill the entire city of NY if it was released and had to be keep cool and could not without power, ( just a though)
So a building like this would most likely be wired to blow if and in the event of such a thing happened.
Just a though
2006-10-20 00:38:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i see most people who answered don't know you are asking about building 7, not the two main towers. some sent me a FEMA link i think it was, with the whole thing. if you do a search i already asked this and the link is very informative. go read it.
here i got it for you
Best Answer - Chosen By You
It was severely damaged by all the debris that fell from the other towers, as were most of the buildings in the area. Here's a link to a site that has photos of building 7, after the damage and prior to the collapse.
Source(s):
FEMA Report, Chapter 5 - http://www.house.gov/science/hot/wtc/wtc...
2006-10-19 23:17:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by advicemom 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Your question is getting very tiresome, no matter how you re-phase it. I'll explain this to you very slowly, so maybe you will get it. Al Queda terrorists hi-jacked four commercial airplanes, drove two of them into the Twin towers, and the fall-out collapsed several other buildings. The heat generated from the airplane fuel crippled the frames of those buildings. They also hit the Pentagon, and they failed at their fourth attempt, when the passengers aboard thwarted the terrorists intentions. Get it now? And please stop asking this same stupid question over and over.
2006-10-20 00:45:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by greg j. 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
They placed bombs within the building and imploded it. Next time you see the footage compare it with a imploded building and you will see the eerie closeness. Thats the main complaint behind the 9/11 truth movement.
Also don't bother getting through the thick headed people. People who believe the government is not capable of this, is the reason why the government is getting away with this.
2006-10-19 23:15:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
...and no other building ever had two 1350 ft.+ towers with over 100 acres of floor space (each) collapse directly in front of them.
You think that may have had something to do with it Einstein?
2006-10-20 02:23:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
At this point and faced with the documented evidence
OF:
THERMATE
BOMBS GOING OFF EVERYWHERE
FREEFALL INTO FOOTPRINT
DETONATION SQUIBS
SMOLDERING POOLS OF MOLTEN STEEL FOR WEEKS
KRONGARD INSIDER TRADING ('PUTS' ON UNITED AND AMERICAN)
BLATENT BLDG 7 DEMO-IMPLOSION
SILVERSTEIN'S "PULL IT"
PEOPLE WARNED NOT TO FLY
PROVEN FAKE OBL TAPES
7 OF 19 ALIVE
NO ARABS ON ANY FLIGHT MANIFESTS
NORAD STAND DOWN ORDER
CNN REPORT OF "NO PLANE AT PENTAGON"
RUMSFELD ADMITTING A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON
RUMSFELD ADMITTING FLT 93 WAS SHOT DOWN
MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS WARGAMES ON 9-11 OF THE EXACT SCENERIO
FEMA'S ARRIVAL TO LOWER MANHATTAN ON SEPT.10TH
PNAC'S PUBLISHED NEED FOR A "NEW PEARL HARBOR"
SS NOT REACTING TO GOAT READING CHIMP TARGET
OPERATION NORTHWOODS
THE DOWNING STREET MEMO
BUSH'S DIARY ENTRY 'NEW PEARL HARBOR'
ANYONE STILL CLINGING TO THE BUSHCO ISSUED FAIRYTALE IS EITHER A DOWN SYNDROME VICTIM OR SOMEONE WHO WOULD FOLLOW BUSH'S LIES TO THEIR GRAVE.
THERE'S NO MORE DEBATING
THAT'S THE END OF THIS STORY
2006-10-20 00:08:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by mikeygonebad 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
read "the new pearl harbour" by Griffin and also read the entire 9/11 commission report.You will find hundreds of things that make no sense whatsoever unless the buildings were imploded
2006-10-19 23:35:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Paul I 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Question: How many tons of stuff fell on 7WTC from 1 &/or 2 WTC, and from how high? I imagine that may have some bearing on the matter. Beyond that, I don't know.
2006-10-19 23:13:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by engineer01 5
·
2⤊
3⤋