Politics & Government - 7 October 2006

Hello,

I think I am just worrying too much. My husband is on probation for a misdemeanor (which will be off his record in feb). He is starting a new job next month and their only requirement is to get a passport and be able to rent a car. His probation officer says there should not be a problem with that, but like I said, I am worried.
any thoughts?

2006-10-07 11:42:36 · 5 answers · asked by ifgravity1 2 in Law & Ethics

Would you support a move by our government to begin deporting anyone who can not prove citizenship? What proof should be required to remain in the US?

2006-10-07 11:42:12 · 23 answers · asked by namvet68 2 in Immigration

If you are a spy talk to us.

2006-10-07 11:41:54 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Embassies & Consulates

Our soilders needlesly die everyday and for what? Even if we can "liberate" Iraq down the line another psycho leader will take over and turn Iraq back into what it was. Why can't they just come home? Unless they come here, we should stay away, then we have more protection on the homefront anyway.

2006-10-07 11:40:09 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

I'm Native American and have my opinion, what's yours? A simple yes or no is ok.

2006-10-07 11:39:50 · 16 answers · asked by «»RUBY«» 4 in Immigration

I know that there has lately been an issue about N. Korea, testing bombs and things. A few months ago, there was talk that the U.S. was warning them about testing a bomb that could possibly reach us here. However, the most recent news is all about Japan, S.Korea, and I believe Russia, warning N.Korea about the testing. So, I was wondering if something does happen, would the US be more likely to just let Japan, S.Korea, Russia, and maybe the U.N. handle the issue..or would is it likely that the U.S. would also be involved in this as well? Any chance that we might just practice neutrality on this issue, and let the rest of them handle it?

2006-10-07 11:38:09 · 11 answers · asked by LibraT 4 in Politics

2006-10-07 11:37:13 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

That is, if all of a sudden they were deemed to be LEGAL, would you law and order folks find some other reason to get rid of them?

2006-10-07 11:37:12 · 14 answers · asked by Brand X 6 in Immigration

Iraq isn't the first. Who put America in charge? What gives us the right to tell other countries what to do?

2006-10-07 11:36:44 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn9Fr7Tpd20

2006-10-07 11:35:58 · 7 answers · asked by AZRAEL Ψ 5 in Other - Politics & Government

There are alot more of us than them, and alot of things they do are in their interest, not the publics. Why is it that we prefer to be bossed around and live mindless lives when we could revolt and implement a government that works for the people?

2006-10-07 11:35:40 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government

your a American. Not African american, asian american, mexican american, etc. If you want to be a citizen, you need to forgo your prior algence. If not, how can we trust you if we are at war with your former country?

2006-10-07 11:35:27 · 18 answers · asked by Common Sense 5 in Immigration

Cheney - Former CEO, Halliburton; Ret. JCS Richard Myers - Board of Directors, Northrup Grumman; Pete Aldridge Jr., - Former UnderSecretary of Defense; Gordon R. England, former president of Lockheed Martin and former Secretary of the Navy, is now Deputy Director of Homeland Security.

2006-10-07 11:34:10 · 7 answers · asked by Lisa M 3 in Government

ANYONE WHO HAS READ AN ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM UNDERSTANDS HOW THE REPUBCLICAN PARTY MANIPULATED THE NUMBER OF THE BAD POLICIES THAT ARE CURRENLY IN EFFECT.
I HOPE THAT THERE IS A GROUP THAT HAS TAKEN THIS SCIENCE OF FRAMEING AN AGENDA OR ISSUE BY USEING IT FOR WHAT IS TRUELY IMPORTANT (THE TRUTH) THE PURPOSE OF TRUE COMMUNACATION BETWEEN THE LEADERS OF OUR NATION AND IT'S CITIZENS MUST BE THE TRUTH NOT AN AGENDA!!
IF YOU HAVE YET TO READ THIS SMALL PAPERBACK BOOK "AN ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM" I HONESTLY BELIEVE EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO READ IT. TO SAY IT IS AN EYE OPENER IS AN UNDERSTATMENT. I AM SORRY FOR THE BAD GRAMMER AND MIS-SPELLED WORDS MAYBE WE WILL CONVINCE YAHOO TO ADD A SPELL CHEAK TO THIS PORTION OF ANSWERS.

2006-10-07 11:32:41 · 8 answers · asked by randy g 1 in Elections

2006-10-07 11:28:12 · 23 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4 in Politics

2006-10-07 11:25:32 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

Because you can give them a buzz and send them to the slaughter house.When will it end????........Tom Science

2006-10-07 11:24:59 · 12 answers · asked by tom science 4 in Politics

The polls are important to them,what other countries think are important to them but having a back bone sure isnt.If it were up to them we would be more like france and be good at two things cooking and surrendering.

2006-10-07 11:20:59 · 22 answers · asked by halfbright 5 in Other - Politics & Government

are they ashamed of the gay republicans in the republican party, like Foley, or their hypocrisy?
(most child predators are not homosexual, their heterosexual)

2006-10-07 11:20:16 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-10-07 11:19:11 · 7 answers · asked by butterflykisses4me2003 1 in Politics

2006-10-07 11:18:48 · 9 answers · asked by ted 1 in Military

Historically, legal immigration has been around 15% of all immigrants, there are a lot of high thinkers out there who’s families also came to America in a questionable fashion. Since everyone with the exception of the Native Americans came here as an immigrant, 85% of you are related to an illegal immigrants. Is it true that only descendents of legal immigrants are making this argument?

2006-10-07 11:18:04 · 29 answers · asked by namvet68 2 in Immigration

2006-10-07 11:17:45 · 5 answers · asked by ted 1 in Military

2006-10-07 11:16:01 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has embarked on an ambitious agenda for "Cleaning the U.S. House" once she assumes control.

There is, of course, the unfinished business of the November 7 elections to consider, but Congresswoman Pelosi regards the election itself to be a minor detail, unworthy of undue distraction.


To Americans still on the fence about the election, please think about the likely agenda that Pelosi would pursue:



* Impeachment of George W. Bush:


Pelosi and her supporters have all but guaranteed to impeach the president if elected. Pelosi is likely to make "swearing at George W. Bush" her first item of business after the obligatory "swearing in" of the new congress.



* Withdrawal of Troops From Iraq:


Once President Bush has been dealt with, Pelosi will move for the immediate withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq. Pelosi will ask that the 130,000 troops in Iraq be placed on "stand by" for assignment to Haiti or other location where there is absolutely no legitimate American interest at stake.


Congresswoman Pelosi will also ask that American military force be available to seize any Wal-Mart store that refuses to cover 100% of employee health care costs, or to pay a minimum wage of $25 an hour.



* Apology for "Ugly American" Behavior:


Democrats would like nothing better than to issue a blanket apology to the world for America's wrongheaded policies while Republicans controlled the White House and or either chamber of congress. Such a declaration would specifically apologize to all Muslims, Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong Il, leaders of the former USSR, and assorted other nice guys for the boorish, America first, behavior of Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and both U.S. presidents answering to the moniker George Bush.



* Forgiveness of Terrorists:


If Speaker Pelosi were to have her way, the United States would issue a formal statement of forgiveness to Osama bin Laden and the original 19 hijackers of 9/11 notoriety. The Pelosi statement would declare that, all things considered, America probably deserved 9/11.


The statement would include a thank-you message to bin Laden for delaying the World Trade Center attack until Bill Clinton was safely out of office, thereby allowing Democrats to blame George W. Bush for 9/11.


Pelosi would also make it a federal "hate crime" to draw derisive cartoons, speak in a disparaging manner, or otherwise offend Islam, the prophet, Allah, the Koran, or Osama bin Laden.



* Free Pilot Training:


In the name of acceptance and to demonstrate that real Americans do not hold grudges, Ms. Pelosi would propose to provide free training and licenses to young Middle-Eastern men from terrorist-sponsoring nations who speak Arabic and who have always dreamed of flying jumbo jets. This program would not cover plane landings.

2006-10-07 11:14:25 · 11 answers · asked by Jean R 3 in Politics

2006-10-07 11:11:51 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

What exactly does a Gunner Mate in the Army do in your own words?..

2006-10-07 11:11:33 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Bush's approval rating is 33%!!!
How do you explain that?

2006-10-07 11:11:28 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

can i get a valid restraining order on a puppet? if the puppet were convicted,are they imprisoned in gen. population or housed seprately from people.how do you know if a legal firm does puppet clientel,or if its hush on special treatment for them generaly in our court system?

2006-10-07 11:10:53 · 4 answers · asked by julie f 1 in Law & Ethics

I understand people believe in gun control. I think this may be regional. I live in the west where many people are armed. If you are for or against guns can you tell me which coast or region you are from? I am thinking this is really regional. This is a constutional right and I think people sometimes confuse it as being pollitical. Also can someone from CA tell me the view out there.

2006-10-07 11:09:34 · 24 answers · asked by adobeprincess 6 in Other - Politics & Government