Every four years we put ourselves through a national exercise in governance. Employing an arcane system of party politics, we are given usually two main candidates to select between to choose a leader.
However in the real world government obviously does not rely on the judgement of any single man. Considering our current leader it may even be said that this leader actually serves no function but to be the front of a committee or group which actually formulates policy. Why do we feel we need a symbolic leader, when we all must know that the real decisions are made by no single individual, but by committees of people, most of whom are not even elected?
My question then has two parts. 1) does anyone believe that a single person really makes policy? and 2) Why do we bother with this deception? Wouldn't it be better to admit that we are governed by groups of men, many of whom are not actually democratically elected?
2006-08-16
03:42:50
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Government