English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 16 August 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

Recently my school principal banned the junior vice president from running for senior vice pres because of his critcism of the principals curriculum on state tests and focusing on making the points not whether or not the students fully understood the material. Was this legal?

2006-08-16 03:14:19 · 12 answers · asked by Sarah K 2 in Law & Ethics

is the public school systems way of controlling us? Isn't self-esteem self-respect? And self-respect is something people have to get on their own. By saying it is self-esteem, the school system has the right to blame it on others since they say others can only raise a person's self-esteem

2006-08-16 03:14:10 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Sergeant James here. Man, that was good stuff, just the over all experience.

2006-08-16 03:12:43 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

so my question is..
what do you think about apartment complexes?
who are they for?
how come nobody ever says APARTMENT TRASH?
they are just as trashy as some trailer parks if not trashier!!!

and how come those people aren't called racists when they say things about white trailer trash?

you ask ...what does this have to do with immigration ?? Illegal aliens live in trailer parks & apartment complexes.

2006-08-16 03:12:16 · 19 answers · asked by The Evil Eye 1 in Immigration

what makes them think that redistrobution of wealth works?

2006-08-16 03:08:41 · 19 answers · asked by W E J 4 in Politics

THEY are doing this because of there religion and anyone who does not see this is blind and plain stupid.
SO how do we change there religion so fighting change and the people who bring it are welcomed .
BY association with these people we take the chance that they will see us as a threat to there way of life and God and do what is told of in there religion which is to kill all the infeidels .
WE must leave these people completely alone or give them a new God to worship that is kinder .
WHAT other option is there ?
LETS see !
1) we can wipe them off the face of the earth .
2) we can replace there god
3)we can spend a hundred years in there face controloing access to weapons like box cutters .
4)THIS is my favorite (LEAVE THESE NUT JOBS ALONE ).

2006-08-16 03:04:16 · 9 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics

So far, their strategy has only been to assign blame for the terrorism. But they have not expressed a better plan to deal with it. Clinton's strategy was to ignore it. And we got 9/11. Bush met it head on and we haven't been attacked in 5 years. Will the Democrats come up with a candidate and a plan that will look better to the voters? Any guess as to what that plan will be?

2006-08-16 03:03:11 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Civic Participation

who where going to blow up those plane's? l can't put my answer down because it would be took off right away! thanks

2006-08-16 03:02:13 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

(you have to save both)?

2006-08-16 02:58:30 · 13 answers · asked by Yawar Abbas 2 in Civic Participation

Pro-Bush dopes and neocons are quick to label anyone who challenges our Iraq policy as "Unpatriotic" or "Pro-terrorist". But, honestly, how dumb do you have to be to claim that deposing a secular government in Iraq and replacing them with pro-Iranian, pro-Hezbollah Shiite radicals is in our best interest?

And, neocons, before you start whining about "WMDs", let's talk about them honestly, for a change, shall we? Chemical and biological weapons are effective only if you have a massive delivery system, such as an army walking through a village spraying them on people. As a terrorist weapon, they are basically useless. As a point of comparison - the sarin gas attack in Japan killed TWELVE people and cost MILLIONS, while the 9/11 hi-jackers killed THOUSANDS using BOXCUTTERS. Clearly not much bang for the buck. So, Bush upped the ante, by knowingly lying about aluminum tubes and Nigerian yellowcake purchases.

Iran IS trying to build nukes, and we just gave them a powerful ally. Oops.

2006-08-16 02:57:39 · 11 answers · asked by lamoviemaven 3 in Politics

I've thought of either:
A: Steal it as he's hardly gonna go to the police is he?
B: Blackmail him for a share of the cash?
C: Trade him for a few nights with his wife?

I can't think of any others, though I would like a new telly.

2006-08-16 02:56:13 · 59 answers · asked by SilentRunning 3 in Law & Ethics

there are currently 312 books about iraq,,,not one says its going well...........so much for mission accomplished

2006-08-16 02:54:56 · 11 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-08-16 02:53:47 · 8 answers · asked by Petals 2 in Politics

2006-08-16 02:53:44 · 5 answers · asked by deep 1 in Government

In my opinion the loses are the people of Lebanon & northern Israel, and maybe, one day, the rest of Israel .. but not Hesbollah, who are now proclaimed as heroes in Arab & Muslim nations all over the World .. and of course not Bush or Blair, for whom every attack by the so called terrorists - even those motivated by opposition to their policies - is a further vindication of their war on terror. And not the Israel Defence Forces. Faced with emboldened enemies, they can demand more resources and greater powers. The generals did not intend to lose, but even this disaster has done them no harm. It has made the Israeli ppl. less secure, therefore more inclined to vote for those who promise to defend them.

WHAT IS YOUR OPINION??

2006-08-16 02:50:41 · 12 answers · asked by alsahran_ye 4 in Other - Politics & Government

Theoretical scenario. Bob is indited for animal abuse but the prosecuter has minimal evidence. Nothing concrete. But Bob is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to enjoy abusing and torturing cyberpets and tamagotchis on a regular basis. The prosecuter presents this as part of the case evidence against Bob. Would this be admissable in a court of law? Would it sway the judge / jury at all towards a guilty verdict?

2006-08-16 02:48:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Ratify it here-- send a message to coercive fanatics. We don't want anything to do with you or your lousy religion.

2006-08-16 02:46:41 · 26 answers · asked by kreevich 5 in Other - Politics & Government

i heard that illegals have some americans identifacation and are using them to secure jobs.has anyone have this happen to them.and if so how do you stop it?

2006-08-16 02:41:55 · 9 answers · asked by antho c 2 in Immigration

kook fringe or have they uncovered the CONSPIRACY?

2006-08-16 02:41:47 · 27 answers · asked by pilotB 3 in Other - Politics & Government

People have said that she's had enough of his "my way or the highway" attitude with not only politics, but with her as well. It is also reported that she said he is the most foney, self-centered person she's ever known.

2006-08-16 02:41:14 · 8 answers · asked by elw 3 in Politics

2006-08-16 02:40:37 · 3 answers · asked by M73 1 in Law & Ethics

Getting my eye examined and this guy in the same waiting room as me yanks the curtain open and would not stop talking to me. Me being the nice person I am talked back. Then he warned me not to tell the doctor anything because the hospital can have me commited. Then he started doing yoga on his bed and he made me a paper rose before I left. Should I be scared that he is going to stalk me? I told him where I worked before he started acting all wierd. I heard him tell the nurse he was there for anxiety and stress.

2006-08-16 02:38:15 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

gov. groups called ice and image are starting major overhauls on illigeal activities.they figure employers are the ones who are making it possible for illegals to work and live in the u.s.a so they have a system up were employees can call on there own employers if they suspect illegal activity.without reprisal.the system works through data base that detects if you are legal or not.and empoyers are encouraged to join the data base so they will be in compliance with the law.or face stiff penalties.my question is do you think this is the best system for stoppin illegal activity?i mean if they cant work they cant stay? right? if not what other ways are better to deport?legally.

2006-08-16 02:37:37 · 10 answers · asked by antho c 2 in Immigration

When one, from literally and land in the world, dreams about being; happy, not struggling with providing food or money for their family, being some one of importance to the world where to they envision living?
When you think of places of beautiful weather in which to live in and raise a family. (consistantly pleasant)
Where do people think of?
the answer to these questions create jeolousy and hate to people who are too undereducated to identify their feelings and do something to enpower themselves

2006-08-16 02:37:26 · 9 answers · asked by redirus91 3 in Immigration

its something for school. i must come up with the benefits of israel not attacking lebanon. detailed. thanks

2006-08-16 02:35:38 · 12 answers · asked by Jules 1 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-08-16 02:34:09 · 12 answers · asked by soggyflipflopbrain 1 in Law & Ethics

fedest.com, questions and answers