I mean, if democracy is the political system where we, the people, chose our way of living, studying, dressing ourselves up; is where we elect our governors, etc., why is not an expression of non-freedom the fact that we, the people, cannot choose the political system itself?
I've never know that a democratic country has, in a election, chosen to be a presidencialism, a monarchy, an oligarchy, a dictatiorship, etc. Is not it the privation itself of the so called freedom?
And the ones who cannot do the things that the riches can, are they also free people? They don't have money all right. Don't they have it bc of their own or bc of their political-social situation, which is before and greater then them?
Imagine that the riches pass all the year distribuing pocket money, a few buks for the poor ones. Is not it an expression and affirmation of human indignity? To survive with almses is a good thing, *~jessi~*?
Cahrity is good but not forever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good job dudes!
2006-08-11
05:19:09
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics