2006-08-11 05:08:13 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
we dont like to name our actual enemy. It might offend those who are only cheerleaders for the muslim hoards.
2006-08-11 05:14:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not so. The American forces ousted the British by dirty tactics during the Revolutionary War by not standing in columns. This is simply a means of using advantages of nature or subversion to achieve their goals. You don't appreciate that those guerillas are very skilled at their war-craft. The US totally ignored the successful guerillas in Vietnam and their immense tunnel systems....entire military complexes underground with storage, and even medical facilities and lost the war to their skills..North Korea is preparing the same and has issued instructions to the people how to do it..It takes many soldiers to flush out one guerilla and thus the guerillas tie up a lot of energy at very little expense of manpower. You may call them dirty but I would prefer a nice armed company to fight with than one guerilla.
2006-08-11 12:21:03 · answer #2 · answered by Frank 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, you can call them dirty fighters if you want but that is not practical.
Another things is that one man's guerrilla is another man's freedom fighter.
2006-08-11 12:17:10 · answer #3 · answered by Mohammed R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guerilla: "a member of an irregular armed force that fights a stronger force by sabotage and harassment"
How does this definition not fit?
2006-08-11 12:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's sad that people have to fight at all, but since we do there is no such thing as fair in a fight, fight to win or don't fight at all!
2006-08-11 12:15:27 · answer #5 · answered by Jasunni 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what is that say what you mean and mean what you say my friend
2006-08-11 12:10:41 · answer #6 · answered by idontkno 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋