Before I further explain my question, I want you all to know that I favor truth over any political party. Wheather a man be Republican or Democrat, if he is right then he is right, but if he is wrong then he is wrong.
That being said, I have noticed a confusion and hypocrisy amongst Democrats. Many of them blamed Bush and his administration for the havoc of 9/11. They claim Bush failed in protecting his people. However, they are then angry at Bush for the war in Iraq, and his inteligence methods.
Of course, I long for all war to be over, but how else could the US prevent further terorists attacts without disabling the terorists? Like it or not, terrorists do not listen to reason or talking. Sometimes one has to fight fire with fire.
Secondly, how else can a terrorist attack be avoided without intercepting their plans? Either we know before hand, or we know when it's too late. I do not want my privacy invaded, but I much less want another 9/11. At the very least, do you see my point?
2006-06-13
10:52:30
·
6 answers
·
asked by
man_id_unknown
4
in
Other - Politics & Government