There seems to be this ongoing argument on here regarding whether 'Mutts' (not my expression!) or Pure breds are healthier. Could someone enlighten me.... I was always of the understanding that because some of the extreme features in pedigrees are watered down in mix breeds that they tend to be healthier (i.e less wrinkles, more appropriate proportions, longer noses, less breathing problems etc). But I have come across breeders on here answering questions implying that pedigree dogs are healthier. Any vets/professionals have any opinions on this matter????
2006-07-12
01:37:19
·
21 answers
·
asked by
joinlondon
2
in
Dogs