Truthfully, I'm asking this mostly to give my answer.
I think their scientific arguments are strained and that the real reasons are:
Some people are very opposed to collective international actions and government control, as a philosophy. They want individual actions guided by the free market. This is not always wrong, but it is not helpful in dealing with enormous problems that actually need collective international solutions and government control.
Global warming is a huge problem that will require money and lifestyle changes from us well before we are personally damaged by it. It's very human to prefer to simply deny it's happening. People do things like that all the time.
I continue to believe the scientific arguments made by global warming critics are refuted by both hard scientific data and the opinion of knowledgeable people. But hopefully I'll be a little less self-righteous and more understanding when I say so.
Please deepen my understanding by answering.
2007-02-08
01:26:08
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Bob
7