Environment - February 2007

2007-02-07 10:10:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have a 90 gallon aquarium 70 lbs live rock, 100 lbs of sand, wet dry filter system and protein skimmer. Can someone tell me why I get ammonia readings in every test 0.25 (I use red sea) but never any nitrite readings. I do have nitrates. There is 3 fish in the tank each one is 3 inches. Ph is 8.2. I do regular water changes.The tank has been set up for 2 months. I have algae growing and my fish are doing well just confused about the ammonia.

2007-02-07 09:35:08 · 2 answers · asked by roeman 5

There is a mindset that maintains dumping trash in landfills is less costly than processing trash into raw material. There is no data indicating the cost of processing in more than the cost of dumping. What if environmental concerns are factored into this? Landfills polute for hundreds of years while processing reduces polution for several reasons. So, from an environmental perspective the processing of trash is much the better method. It is clear landfills are of no value to anyone and should be replaced by a process that transforms trash into useful raw material. Why not develop a process and stop the mindless landfill? Its really a rather simple process afterall.

2007-02-07 09:28:26 · 4 answers · asked by jim m 5

2007-02-07 09:09:31 · 12 answers · asked by Barrie G 3

2007-02-07 08:35:23 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

what must happen to the pyrite for it to be used for products?

2007-02-07 08:21:43 · 1 answers · asked by paula e 1

Smog was a killer, vehicles did not have catalytic convertors and had extremely dirty exhaust fumes. Factories had very poor regulation of discharges compared with today. Yet we are told that all the damage to our earth is caused by modern vehicle and factory discharges.
Why is this the case?

2007-02-07 07:30:00 · 12 answers · asked by Web Foot 2

a. basic
b. secondary
c. whole
d. derived

2007-02-07 07:04:10 · 4 answers · asked by siran357 1

2007-02-07 06:51:55 · 6 answers · asked by nadine n 1

2007-02-07 06:18:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-07 06:12:36 · 8 answers · asked by GOOCH 4

I'm sick of the lies. This isn't the first time the government has lied about something big.

http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/DrRobertCarton.htm

Dr. William Marcus, an EPA senior science adviser and toxicologist stated in "Food and Water Journal," 1998, " Fluoride is a carcinogen by any stand we use. I believe EPA should act immediately to protect the public, not just on the cancer data, but on the evidence of bone fractures, arthritis, mutagenicity and other effects."

I know very well the inclination of people in high power to make a profit at people's expense and to use manipulative information to keep those in the media and scientific community in compliance. Fluoride was a menacing air pollutant until large companies found out they could get rid of it in water and say it was the holy grail for teeth decay prevention.

2007-02-07 06:05:14 · 5 answers · asked by Ilooklikemyavatar..exactly 3

I never expected global warming to be so cold. Seems like whatever happens, we can blame good ol global warming

2007-02-07 05:48:51 · 14 answers · asked by Lane 4

The population proportion is less than 0.65.
The sample proportion is less than 0.65.
The population proportion is no less than 0.65.
The sample proportion is no less than 0.65.

2007-02-07 05:16:18 · 3 answers · asked by partiesbyrosa 1

2007-02-07 05:09:59 · 7 answers · asked by JeL C 1

What is the Standard method for this test.

2007-02-07 04:16:44 · 2 answers · asked by J.D. 1

2007-02-07 04:16:31 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

The price of petrol and diesel are rising day by day and our hydrocarbon reserves are diminishing...Although researches are still going on..to find a substitute,what else can we do to prevent "lack of fuel" condition??

Any ideas?Any sugestions??

2007-02-07 04:16:22 · 9 answers · asked by For peace 3

How does Global Warming affect the immediate future of the human race, and of all living things on this planet?

2007-02-07 03:59:54 · 8 answers · asked by sarinadipity 1

give answers wit proof

2007-02-07 03:51:05 · 9 answers · asked by veda 1

2007-02-07 03:50:02 · 1 answers · asked by novafan 2

2007-02-07 03:49:14 · 3 answers · asked by novafan 2

2007-02-07 03:15:15 · 2 answers · asked by hargrove_shaniece 1

We are now left whith just 10% of India covered with forest whereas it should be more than 33%. We should be planting more plants. Because of pollution the Global Warming rate is going higher. We should take more measures. And the many animals which are now endangered. This should be stopped, I mean killing of animals. What do you think?

2007-02-07 02:55:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-02-07 02:55:25 · 12 answers · asked by Ash 2

facts & example

2007-02-07 02:41:33 · 2 answers · asked by Ranajite P 1

2007-02-07 02:25:39 · 4 answers · asked by ariel 1

How do people walking to the north or south pole go to the toilet?

2007-02-07 02:10:36 · 3 answers · asked by themelon 2

why are specific wilderness areas important?

2007-02-07 02:04:00 · 2 answers · asked by leigh h 1

water polution ms getting worse when is real action going to be taken

2007-02-07 01:52:33 · 8 answers · asked by j j 1