English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

There are a whole variety of combustion products and contaminants.

But we don't launch enough shuttles to worry about it. Airplanes are more important, because they are so many more of them. And even they are not a big problem.

Volcanoes are an insignificant part of ozone depletion.

In dealing with environmental problems, it's easy to get diverted by some fascinating thing, and lose the important focus on the main real problem.

For ozone depletion the main problem is chlorofluorocarbons used in refrigeration. The "Montreal Protocol" addresses those, and other ozone depleting gases created by man. If all nations enthisiastically follow it, we'll be fine. So far, progress is good, we've dramatically slowed the rate of ozone depletion. If we continue to work hard on implementing the Montreal Protocol, we'll restore the zone layer to previous levels. For more information:

http://www.theozonehole.com/montreal.htm

2007-02-08 01:00:07 · answer #1 · answered by Bob 7 · 0 0

To much time on your hands. I would worry more about a volcanic eruption versus a space launch, Mother Nature can do far more to elevate or deplete ozone then we ever will.

2007-02-08 00:25:34 · answer #2 · answered by southforty1961 3 · 0 0

They do hot affect the ozone layer. What do u produce when u burn hydrogen with oxygen it is water and sense it is not impacting the atmosphere now what.

2007-02-08 03:43:11 · answer #3 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 0

It's primarily water. They burn hydrogen with oxygen.

2007-02-08 00:24:12 · answer #4 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers