In his final judgement in the Dover trial, Judge Jones absolutely slammed the proponents of intelligent design. Among his comments was, "The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory."
Why do the proponents of this religious dogma continue to claim that it is science and why do they even bother trying to suggest that it is anything other than creationism with a different title?
2007-04-12
00:07:39
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality