How do we tell the difference between things we do not know yet, for which a naturalistic explanation will presumably be discovered in due time, and things we will never know, for which a supernatural explanation is required? In other words, why is "God did it" acceptable in some situations and not others. Shouldn't a creationist have to answer this question to substantiate their "God of the Gaps" argument? Otherwise, the whole enterprise of science is undermined, and everything can be explained away as "God".
2007-10-23
08:20:08
·
21 answers
·
asked by
neil s
7