Macro evolution says that one species changes into another species over the course of millions of years. But have scientist ever found a missing link from one species to another? There's something called living fossils. Animals which scientist have thought been exticnt for millions of years, been then have been found still living. Over a 150 such living fossils have been found, and none of them show any signs of evolution.
One of the oldest living fossils found is the lobe fish. Believed to have been exticnt for over 50 million years, it was found to be still alive in the Indian Ocean. In fact, the Lobe Fish is called index fossil, meaning scientist use it to date rock formations. I guess these dates will have to be rethought. The amazing thing, their so-called 50 million year old fossils, and today's lobe fish, show no evidence of evolution.
I believe the Bible, that each kind of animal reproduces it's own kind. If macro-evolution is true, where are the missing links?
2007-01-26
12:40:37
·
22 answers
·
asked by
theo48
1