Religion & Spirituality - 13 September 2006

One thing they like to say is that "lots" of scientists support the theory. It simply isn't true: Discovery Institute has few scientists and even fewer biologists.

This prof. Behe they refer to is a biochemist, but he teaches at a university few have ever heard. Of the few Phds (it's mostly a technical college) that it offers, none are in Science.

The other advocate, this Dembinski guy is a complete freak. If you go to his blog there's almost no attempt to scientifically back his claim, it's mostly just badly argued creation science and talk about how the scientist are godless.

Pathetic stuff. Google it yourself!

2006-09-13 01:23:15 · 11 answers · asked by Brendan G 4

I repent every weekend. Don't you?

2006-09-13 01:22:11 · 19 answers · asked by Ask Donna 3

I'm not looking for political answers, but religion & spirituality answers. Canadians: Has y(our) prime MINISTER become as a cheerleader of GWB's awful lawful 'rule of law', of such "law worketh wrath", which "God hath NOT appt'd us unto"?

This law law business of $acrifice has been promoted to the world by Pope John-Paul in 1999, then by GWB in 2001, and now by PM Stephen Harper in 2006. Have they not read the Holy Bible, which flat out says the will of God is: "I will have mercy, and not sacrifice", and the "not" part is notably not then, not now, not ever? Do they know not that God never desired sacrifice for sin, nor ever took pleasure in watching such sacrifice-all law law? Ps 40:6; Ps 51:16; Hos 6:6; Mt 9:13; Mt 12:7; Heb 10:all.

Forgive "them", for they "know not" what they do (Lk 23:34) & it's notably what "they say" which brings sudden "destruction" of the "no escape" sort on "them" (Mt 15:11; 1Thess 5:3).

Your comments?

2006-09-13 01:19:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 01:18:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Don't want to even think out of their Bible or Koran? Are you afraid if you have your own thinking put own Yahoo ans you will be punished by God, Also why are you not accepting who ever wants to think differently has the right to do so.
If there is an ans not liked by some people regarding their religion, Immedeatly there is a counter question or there is abusive words used
Particularly Christians and muslims argue using their holy books
This question came to my mind only because of the ans and questions that I have been reading in the last 2Months in this catogery

2006-09-13 01:18:03 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 01:11:10 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am having a hard time understanding relationships (romantic) and if they make any sense at all

2006-09-13 01:10:11 · 12 answers · asked by Guishe 1

Is it ok to lie for Jesus?

e.g. to tell people Darwin recanted when he did NOT
e.g. to tell people that neo-Darwinists claim that we evolved from monkeys
e.g. to claim the 2nd law of thermodynamics prohibits evolution, when it does not
e.g. to claim radiocarbon dating is inaccurate, when it is not
e.g. to tell people their is 'more evidence for jesus than for julius cesar' when we have coins with him on, articles written by him, his friends and his enemies.

in no way do the comments above claim jesus or the bible to be false, or does it riddicle your religion, just the LIES so many tell

2006-09-13 01:09:44 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.yisraylhawkins.com/ says it's -1 day remaining until nuclear war begins. they have falsely propheciezed nuclear war will start on 12 sept

2006-09-13 01:08:57 · 26 answers · asked by James Blond 4

My line of thought is that New York/Washington is the great city that rules the world
Imperial America is the revived Roman empire

Where can I find scholars who support my idea?

The land of Shinar is where the tower of babel was built
what city do you associate with skyscrapers, the Empire State Building for example?

2006-09-13 01:06:38 · 8 answers · asked by owner4nothing 3

Why do you believe that God created you and not You that created God for whatever purposes, a sense of hope, of morals or just a meaning to your life? Because as far as we know, men wrote the Bible. Did you see God's signature anywhere?

2006-09-13 01:03:53 · 33 answers · asked by Jmyooooh 4

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Am1TCRgOuAmF17cAcb1dAmjsy6IX?qid=20060913004914AAWpCmq

2006-09-13 01:01:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 01:00:27 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

200,000 have pettioned Disney(parent co of ABC) to drop the miniseries rather than try to fix(cover up) what is not accurate nor educational.

Clinton folk say the American people deserve better (not worse).

Does more Mosaic law law ever justify man in the sight of God; Or should "we all are one" be more focused on "grace and truth" (already came from God by Jesus Christ) in order to have a latter end (last state of man) "better"-ed rather than "worse"-end by "seven" spirits more wicked, as allegorically depicted in the "beginning" of "sorrows" in the Revelation(Uncovering) of John turning, back to law "behind" him?

Your comments?

2006-09-13 00:58:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

"even Darwin admitted before he died his theory was wrong"

THIS IS NOT TRUE, WHY TELL LIES?

2006-09-13 00:58:20 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

An earthly shepherd tends his flocks until it's time for them to die and other people to eat them.

2006-09-13 00:57:38 · 7 answers · asked by Nerdly Stud 5

What bible verse is this where is goes where god says vengeance is mines

2006-09-13 00:54:25 · 11 answers · asked by lol 3

2006-09-13 00:54:11 · 12 answers · asked by YoungBuck 1

2006-09-13 00:53:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

If whatsoever is not of faith is sin: Rom 14:23, and the law is not of faith: Gal 3:12; then it reasons "verily verily" John is allegorically saying a law(sin) unto death & a law(sin) not unto death... in which things are an "allegory" in both "covenants": Gal 4:24. For where no law, there no transgression: Rom 4:15 & when no law, then no sin imputed: Rom 5:13.

1st John of 3 Johns says all unrighteousness is sin. So it reasons all law is sin... in such a "mystery". Law, source of sin, is also the strength of sin's death sting: 1Cor 15:56, and the ministration of death: 2Cor 3:7; and the wages of (law imputed)sin is death: Rom 6:23. Breach 1 law = die.

Some (the some-what, I know not what) say confessed sin is a sin not unto death; But Bible says confessed sin makes sinners all, none righteous, no, not one. We all are one. We are delivered from the law, thereby saved from the death sting of such cancer us law can and will kill you all if it's not all removed in time.

Comments

2006-09-13 00:53:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 00:52:11 · 6 answers · asked by YoungBuck 1

2006-09-13 00:49:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will John Lennon's song "Imagine" will be our new creed?

2006-09-13 00:48:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

that basically we evolved ,not some god who just planted 2 humans on this planet to breed.i truly wish there was a god but i just cant see it.how do you dispute darwins theory when sceletons all over the world of different stages in evolution have been found resulting in a close relative neandrathal now us.

2006-09-13 00:44:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since 2001 there has been an academic leaning towards the notion that the Red Hair Gene comes from the mixing of Homo Sapiens and Neaderthals 100,000 years ago or so...

What are your views? Are red hets somehow ungodly if this is true?

2006-09-13 00:43:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is cast, but not in stone; One free from circle; where does He roam?

2006-09-13 00:42:56 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 00:40:18 · 29 answers · asked by paganscgoddesss 1

2006-09-13 00:38:51 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 00:38:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

His website now says -1 days till nuclear war.
http://www.yisraylhawkins.com/
Retirement? Reassess "prophesies"?
Admit he's a quack? I doubt it. Would love to hear from apologists.

2006-09-13 00:38:25 · 3 answers · asked by moofy1974 2