ABC's miniseries: Path to 9/11? An accurate & educational docu-drama or an inaccurate & fictional mocu-drama?

Question

200,000 have pettioned Disney(parent co of ABC) to drop the miniseries rather than try to fix(cover up) what is not accurate nor educational.

Clinton folk say the American people deserve better (not worse).

Does more Mosaic law law ever justify man in the sight of God; Or should "we all are one" be more focused on "grace and truth" (already came from God by Jesus Christ) in order to have a latter end (last state of man) "better"-ed rather than "worse"-end by "seven" spirits more wicked, as allegorically depicted in the "beginning" of "sorrows" in the Revelation(Uncovering) of John turning, back to law "behind" him?

Your comments?

Answer 1

What a pile of crap.

Excuse me but look at what a real plane the size of the one hitting the Pentagon would actually LOOK like next to the Pentagon....then tell me that little bullet that hit it was the plane...sheesh...whatever happened there was not a plane. Not saying the whole thing was a conspiracy but something went wrong and come on...you know the crap they pulled in the past with the terrorists they trained now gone bad...so please...they've already stated that there are lies in that and that people are trying to stop it from airing but cant. So don't buy what you see slapped together in bits and pieces on a big box in your living room.

You're damned right we should all be one. We ARE all one...it's called humanity. There are a lot more than seven evil spirits at work here...there's millions. But if you truly believe in the bible you will truly believe that good will always triumph over evil...but it can't triumph in hiding.

Answer 2

Well, in response to Democrats' protestations, ABC didn't try to defend it on factual grounds, but just said they have fictional license.

The last I heard (from Condoleezza Rice in sworn testimony before the Senate) was that the Bushies were warned about OBL beginning with a Clinton administration report in January 2001, and then repeatedly from various sources thereafter.

I think it is easy to misconstrue or fail to properly vette intelligence, so I wouldn't say the Bushies are responsible for letting it happen; however, clearly the Clinton administration recognized the threat and tried to do something about it. (Remember the cruise missile attack on Afghanistan?)

Answer 3

Is there any question that history is constantly re-written. Isn't intelligent design proof of that? How about who discovered America? How about the Native American Heathens? How about thousands of women who were tortured and burned at the stake for being "witches"? Is the general population dense enough to believe Hollywood's version of history? Look it up for yourselves. Fictional accounts of 9/11 will be recorded as historical truths - why start telling the truth now?

Answer 4

There was a show before that 9/11 movie, that said it was
not realistic. Like where Sandy Berger has a chance to kill
Bin Laden and doesn't. I hope people realize there are
concentrated efforts to subvert our countries. By turning the
people against their own governments. Don't believe all that
drivel you get from the Television. If it's not politics manipulating
our thinking. It's outright treasonous subversives.

Answer 5

Am I not catching something? What does the Mosaic law have to do with the first part of the statement? The words do not make sense to me.

I have several friends who are------and have been---in intelligence. They pretty much agreed with the movie and the story line. Or, are they just angry with the ''hold'' the government has on them-and each other- to not let them do their job?

Answer 6

Clinton and the libs don't like the light. They don't want the truth told.

We are worth a Son to God.

Answer 7

I believe that Clinton is right. I know I am agreing with Clinton. but He is right that the Miniseries should be accurate to what happen that day.

Answer 8

Dame Gladys,i'm making a huge gamble your fave is Sheriff Andy Taylor or Ben Matlock. i elect Peter Falk as "Columbo" The undesirable guy continually underestimated this guy. for the time of the preliminary interview,Columbo might continually have the completed ingredient taken care of,yet he asked likely harmless Qs. the communicate might end with the criminal feeling fairly sensible,yet Columbo might say "Oh. one greater ingredient. that is probable not something,yet...." the ingredient may be the single element that ought to undo the murderer. Then the criminal became quite on pins and needles for approximately 40 two minutes,till finally "dumb previous" Columbo placed him decrease than arrest. I enjoyed that "one greater ingredient...." ingredient.

Answer 9

Ask the Clintons, they seem to think its true enough to be threaten by it, and they demand ABC to edits its contents, or drop the broadcast completely.

Answer 10

I just wish I hadn't missed the first part of it.

But remember ABC is republican supportive and this is airing during an election year.