that basically we evolved ,not some god who just planted 2 humans on this planet to breed.i truly wish there was a god but i just cant see it.how do you dispute darwins theory when sceletons all over the world of different stages in evolution have been found resulting in a close relative neandrathal now us.
2006-09-13 00:44:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
To believe in God is a choice given us; free will. I believe in God.
Darwin believed that all life "evolved" from a single cell life form. This cell divided and formed all life (plant, animal, human) we know and see today.
The "Big Bang Theory" suggests life on this planet is an astrological accident. A collision of particals in the exact proportion needed to support and create life.
My pastor and mentor have had this discussion. It is theorized that God did not create one man and one woman but mankind and womankind in perfection. Genises suggests this when Cain took a wife from an area outside the garden.
Think of the beginning of humankind as an original paper document. It is crisp, clean and easy to read. Now copy that document 100 times and give it to 100 different people. Each of those people make 100 copies and pass them on. Do this about 1000 times and then compare the original document to the final copy. There are many differences. The final copy is blurred, faded and difficult to read but the original is still crisp and clean.
What does this tell you? It tells you that in the beginning humans were made in perfection, and, after banishment from the garden because of sin (this is where the imperfection first starts) and,over time and with many reproductions we have actually "devolved" rather than "evolved".
Humans may have changed over time, as have many animal species, because of their environment; survival of the fitest if you will. Changing to meet the requirements of the environment does not necessary support the idea that we come from one single cell life form. If this were true, all life forms would have a common genome in our DNA and that, science says is not what exists today or ever. It is possible that we came from neandrathal man or even further, some of the newer skeletal remains which have been found in the region of southern Japan. This does not, however, support Darwin's theory of "evolution" but rather supports the ideology that as we ventured out from our original habitat, we changed and adapted to our new environment. As we grew in knowledge by making our own housing, for instance, we needed less body hair to keep us warm. As we developed tools and skills, some of the original design changed as it was used less frequently.
Take our teeth for example, because of changes in dietary sustinance, our teeth have changed shape over the last 200-300 years because our diets have changed.
I believe Darwin barely scraped the surface of what we know today. Yes, we have changed over the course of history but this does not and cannot support the theory that all forms of life came from the same origin.
Hope this helps.
2006-09-13 01:39:04 · answer #1 · answered by Lizzard 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why be afraid of the truth? Man did evolve and it does not conflict with religion. The difference is that the church expects that God created man as a complete entity whereas science is saying that from a simple organism, man slowly changed to become a thinking being. Nothing is ever perfect and the creation of life may be divine but changes were needed to achieve greater perfection of adaptation. The anti-evolutionists say that God created man as a cognizant being, but evolutionists say that from the primordial eras, we changed to become what we are today. We have too many fossils to deny the changes in life forms so why should man be exempt from the same deviations and variations?
2006-09-13 00:54:00 · answer #2 · answered by Frank 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It hasn't been proven - not by a long shot. Most of these skeletons are just fragments, and many have been proven to be entirely false. A supposed humanoid skeleton turned out to be a single pig tooth and a lot of play-dough. Even evolutionists admit that all these fragments together wouldn't cover a pool table.
There are ape skeletons and human skeletons. There has never been anything found to be an intermediate stage.
2006-09-13 03:09:39 · answer #3 · answered by flyersbiblepreacher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What proof. Are you talking about piltdown man? Prove to be a drawing from a pigs tooth. Are you talking about the Skeleton called Lucy? It has been prove to be a to be just an old Lady. Maybe your proof comes from Carbon dating, Well that is so inaccurate that a live mollusk shell dated to be 5.3 millions years old. Hummm if I was a judge this proves evolution wrong.
2006-09-13 00:55:20 · answer #4 · answered by Kenneth G 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You don't have to chose between science and God. There are tons of books by people would uphold the scientific THEORY of evolution as well as attest to God. Just search for "evolution and God" on amazon.
2006-09-13 01:01:40 · answer #5 · answered by WhitworthChick 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gen 6 answers that question. And IF Darwin's theory is correct the WHY did paleontologist find HUMAN foot prints running along side those of dinosaurs? I bet they did NOT teach you that in school!
2006-09-13 00:58:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the findings of Darwin are still occurring TODAY. A month ago, Yahoo! released a news story about a month ago about how the finches Darwin found had to evolve AGAIN to fit their surroundings. Geez it is just a theory, but sometimes theories turn into facts people.
2006-09-13 00:49:19 · answer #7 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why would desire to a terrorist who is familiar with some bomb, who PLANTED it even, take transport of rights? it relatively is like catering to criminals. "Oh, you decide on an outstanding bowl of ice-cream and syrup till now I arrest you for blowing up an abortion hospital? it relatively is in basic terms common, criminals have rights too." provide me a smash. it relatively is why I actually have a difficulty with left-wing liberals. they choose to spoon feed all human beings in u.s. like infants. A terrorist would desire to be tortured to get recommendations. If certainly one of my very own kinfolk or little ones have been in probability, probable abducted and threatened that they may be killed, if I had of undertaking to torture the guy who took my new child to get the recommendations on the place they have been, i'd do it. "What if he lies?". it relatively is a foul attempt to excuse the act of torture. it relatively is better to do it and have a look into to learn something than no longer doing something and gaining no longer something. this would extremely be whilst in comparison with a math try. in case you don't be attentive to the solutions and pass away them sparkling, then you definately're retaining which you have given up. in case you don't be attentive to the solutions yet you are attempting to supply an answer, then you definately're retaining which you have positioned the attempt into it.
2016-09-30 21:57:41 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Soory, Pal...you have been misled...Darwinsim is a theory and is only promoted and believed by the simple minded.
There is NO evidence for evolution , especially in the fossil record.
2006-09-13 00:48:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Only a fool says in his heart, there is no God.
You are worth a Son to God.
2006-09-13 00:55:07 · answer #10 · answered by thomasnotdoubting 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋