I respect that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs. Nonetheless, I hope to peaceably reason with athiests, (as you may hope to reason with me). Of course, I can hardly present tangible evidence of GOD via the Internet. I can, though, at the least, make you think of the possibility of GOD's existance.
That being said, which of the following is the most logical choice as the source of all in nature?
1) All in nature existed eternally
2) Something in the natural existance is the source of all that ever existed in the natural, (including by evolution)
3) Something beyond nature, and with NO intelligence, is the source of all in nature
4) Something beyond nature, and with intelligence, is the source of all in nature
5) Some other conclusion, (although no other conclusion can be formed without some sort of redundancy).
Please explain your logic and reason for your conclusion. Logic and reasoning is key.
Thank you for any and all answers.
2006-06-30
01:45:57
·
10 answers
·
asked by
man_id_unknown
4