This is with regard to the saudi gang rape and I feel it is the responsibility of every muslim to come forward and clarify that how the QATIF GENERAL COURT and it's judge is making a mockery of the SACRED SHARIAH LAW. You can read the case details from the link given below. There are some deep dents and surprisingly none of the scholars are coming forward to point them out. If this is out of respect that saudi is the homeland of ISLAM and our beloved PROPHET MUHAMMAD(P.B.U.H), then let me tell you with pride that had HE(P.B.U.H) been around, situation would'nt have been as ugly as it seems now. Here are the flaws in the judgement.:-
N01:- There is no denying that ISLAM is ver strict about interaction of opposite sexes not in blood relation and being the homeland of ISLAM Saudi is liable to implement the SHARIAH LAW. QURAAN says it is "HARAAM" for men and women who are not relatives to each other, to interact without any urgent and justifiable purpose. However, SHARIAH LAW does'nt say that mere meeting of two strangers will be considered AN ACT OF FORNICATION. This means that if SAUDI has a law which states that when a girl is found in public with a stranger it will be construed as an act of fornication, she should be lashed at 90 times, this is purely their interpretation of SHARIAH LAW. Hence the inherent FLAW in this rule cannot be burdened on the sacred nature of SHARIAH LAW.
N02.The girl was not found doing any indecent act with the man in the car. As per SHARIAH LAW sketched by PROPHET MUHAMMAD(P.B.U.H), a woman's modesty is respected to such an extent that any man walking on the road cannot pass comments on her piety. Hence HE(P.B.U.H) clearly said that only when four people, whose character is held in high esteem by the people of that locality or region and are highly trustworthy, give witness that they were aware of the girl's immoral character and sexual involvement with that particular man, can she be held guilty of fornication(this again in absence of any obvious proofs). In this case, who gave that witness? As far as details of the case are known, her accompanying the stranger in that car was used as an evidence to object on the credentials of her character, this is absolutely against the rule precribed by the PROPHET(P.B.U.H), how can they do this?
N03.Even if I assume that the girl was proven guilty of her immoral involvement with the man, how can the judge increase the lashes from 90 to 200 out of personal grudge with the girl for influencing and aggravating the media ?
N04. When a man is found guilty of involvement in an act of fornication, he is punished with "stoned to death" that is when the girl is married and to be lashed at when the girl is unmarried. Then how come the rapist are not given anything even close to a death penalty? Rather they have been given only 2-9 years imprisonment, after all their act in no way confirms respect for the girl's modesty and shame? Are there political reasons for this, considering that the judge is appointed by the king?
why don't all muslims come out and lambast at this mockery that the QATIF GENERAL COURT is making of the sacrecy of SHARIAH LAW, only augmenting misconceptions in the minds of nonmuslims?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-11-16-saudi-rape_N.htm
2007-11-20
04:32:33
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality