EVERY single time that actual historians and archaeologists have asked to see a SHRED of evidence to support his inane claim, he refuses or has some new excuse or lie to avoid actually having to produce such proof?
Now, wouldn't he be shouting it from the rooftops? Wouldn't he want to hand proof over to so-called "real" archaeologists and historians. Wouldn't a part-time treasure hunter be the first to produce proof if only to turn the archaelogical world on it's ear, not to mention bring a measure of proof to believers worldwide.
So, why then does he have an excuse or lie evertime an honest (and many of these people are christians themselves with a sincere desire to autheticate his findings not discredit) researcher comes to examine his find?
Simple. He's a liar and a fraud. The link below will show the MANY outlandish lies he's told about what he's "discovered".
Honestly, with people like this on your side, it's no wonder we consider you all flakes and liars...
2006-07-10
03:38:02
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality