English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Science & Mathematics - 1 August 2007

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics

Agriculture · Alternative · Astronomy & Space · Biology · Botany · Chemistry · Earth Sciences & Geology · Engineering · Geography · Mathematics · Medicine · Other - Science · Physics · Weather · Zoology

It seems to me like it should be possible to understand how the universe works without the need for experimentation. Is there a way to use logic and mathematics to unravel how the universe operates at a fundamental level?
Here is my argument. Is there anything wrong with it?

1. I think (assumption)
2. I exist (based on 1)
3. The universe consists of all objects and phenomena. (definition of universe)
4. I am part of the universe and the universe exists, although I might be the only member. (based on 2 and 3)
5. Fundamental physical laws govern how the universe operates. (assumption)
6. It is impossible to know if my experiences are real or imagined. (assumption)
7. Therefore, the only thing that I can know about the fundamental laws of the universe, are that they form myself. (based on 4, 5 and 6)

2007-08-01 21:04:22 · 4 answers · asked by Michael M 6 in Physics

...and i am being serious!

Many thanks if you could!

2007-08-01 21:03:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Parapsychology

Tan-1 - inverse tan
Solve for A?

2007-08-01 20:59:19 · 4 answers · asked by taelorcorey00 1 in Mathematics

2007-08-01 20:56:54 · 3 answers · asked by john ruffy t 1 in Chemistry

2007-08-01 20:55:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Astronomy & Space

2007-08-01 20:52:33 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Mathematics

Reduce the equation to standard from, give the coordinates of the vertex, focus, ends of the latus rectum and find the equation of the directrix. I got this wrong in my test yesterday. I'm so careless. Please as much as possible do it step by step to prevent vagueness.


36y^2+72x-132y-239=0

2007-08-01 20:42:15 · 2 answers · asked by Patricia 2 in Mathematics

If we keep reproducing at a rate similar to that of now, what will happen in the future? I think the only way out if we get so close would be for people to be killed, not that I agree with this, but I bet the government would be willing to do this to save the planet... What are your thoughts on this?

2007-08-01 20:26:15 · 15 answers · asked by vEngful.Gibb0n 3 in Geography

Who told you about this 1428 years ago that blows all other theories to dust!
Salam :)

2007-08-01 20:25:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Astronomy & Space

2007-08-01 20:24:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Astronomy & Space

Who told you about this 1428 years ago to the perfect exact specifications as what science knows it as today?
Thank you and Salam

2007-08-01 20:24:03 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Science

North or the south?The Arctic or Antarctic?

2007-08-01 20:18:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Weather

there was past intelligent life on Mars.
I briefly read the guys bio. He is not a wacko by any stretch.
How/why can this guy put forward pretty convinving case for life on Mars while NASA doesnt sign on to any of it??

2007-08-01 20:14:17 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Astronomy & Space

Using Technolgy learned from Quran 1428 years ago explain in summery how you feel they started to learn how to fly in this mannor. Thank you and Salam

2007-08-01 20:10:27 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Astronomy & Space

Considering the fact that an overpopulatd planet may spell doom for mankind ..... are death and disease really our friends ? Is curing disease and increasing mankind's lifespan really counterproductive ??

2007-08-01 20:09:10 · 4 answers · asked by burlingtony 2 in Biology

was there cause for celebration because they suddinly realized they could land on the moon

2007-08-01 20:07:21 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Astronomy & Space

Those who were living near to the possible location of the Eden, please help me...

2007-08-01 19:59:23 · 6 answers · asked by knowledgehunter 1 in Geography

Since a single atom is something like 99.999...percent empty space and since the whole Earth is made up of atoms does that mean that the volume occupied by the Earth or any other object is actually 99.9999...percent space and a very very small percent of mass?

2007-08-01 19:55:48 · 8 answers · asked by Bender[OO] 3 in Physics

how do u multiply .72 * .34 please show all steps WITHOUT calculator. as well as 8/114

2007-08-01 19:48:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Mathematics

I'm currently working on a small project, and I need to make a case for some things by vacuum-forming. The problem is, I don't have a v-f table. Does anyone know a cheap way to make one (like out of wood or something) and how to actually construct one?

2007-08-01 19:45:53 · 2 answers · asked by cidus 1 in Engineering

I often see the letter "s" especially in hairs or cotton stuck to peoples clothes. I wondered if it was due to magnetic or static fields.

2007-08-01 19:45:41 · 7 answers · asked by John M 1 in Physics

I think you substitue it into the a, but adding 3 into the a number being divide has me thrown off.

2007-08-01 19:40:53 · 6 answers · asked by Keshawn 1 in Mathematics

I just need to confirm this, since I was sure until people started to disagree.

Tanning is a release of melanin right? It is different to sun burn.

If there are two people, and person a gets a tan and person b doesn't get anything, that means person a is better off because the body protects itself, and is probably less damaged than person b.

Someone who tans more or easily is better off in sunlight right? Again, there is a difference between burning and tanning.

2007-08-01 19:35:27 · 3 answers · asked by worried person 1 in Biology

fedest.com, questions and answers