Politics - 3 November 2007

2007-11-03 11:33:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

....to get the NAMBLA vote? I hear the catholic priests are split between the parties, but I think the athiest perverts are up for grabs. I already heard some lefty whining about Jessica's Law making more homeless child molesters. Is that the beginning of the NAMBLA-courting strategy?

2007-11-03 11:26:31 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 11:20:42 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 11:07:52 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 11:06:38 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

I do not believe women should have the right to vote plain and simple. Women think with their hearts and not their brain, and repealing the right of women to vote would ensure that we always have Republican presidents.

2007-11-03 11:01:31 · 19 answers · asked by Maryse 1

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071102.html

2007-11-03 10:47:01 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

We have soldiers risking their lives for Iraq but God forbid George Bush put soldiers near our borders to prevent terrorists from sneaking in.
Why does this not make sense?????


For those who say the 911hijackers didnt come thru our borders illegally, whats your point?
Are you saying that this means they cant come next time thru our Mexican or Canadian border??

2007-11-03 10:44:03 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 10:32:10 · 18 answers · asked by $Sun King$ 7

2007-11-03 10:31:53 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 10:31:51 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous

please i dont fully know what it is/means???

2007-11-03 10:22:01 · 23 answers · asked by Danielle 2

2007-11-03 10:19:39 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

We won that war in a couple of weeks. We are fighting literal terrorists that are fighting to destabilize the country to seize power for themselves. The Iraqi gvt is on our side. We are training the Iraqi military and police. We arent fighting the Iraqis, yet so many people on here keep making comments like we are occupying their country or killing Iraqis. The terrorists are blowing up the Iraqis to grab power. We know for a fact that Iran is funding many of these terrorists. The Iraqi gvt has asked us not to leave Iraq at this time.

Do you really find it in the US best interest to leave the country now so that these terrorists organizations, heavily funded and influenced by Iran, can take control over Iraq? How can that possibly be in the best national security interest of the US?

Regardless of whether or not you agreed with this war we are there and have to deal with the reality of the situation as it stands now. Do you really want to hand the country over to Iran?

2007-11-03 10:18:21 · 18 answers · asked by cadisneygirl 7

i'm not saying i'd have advocated either war, i'm just wondering what the war lovers think.

14 of the 19 9/11 terrorists came from saudi arabia. saudi arabia has the largest AQ following. saudi government is doing nothing to stop the anti american terrorist problem (saddam killed terrorists in his country). bin laden himself is a saudi.

is the reason we don't go to saudi because private saudi investors invest billions and billions of dollars in u.s. stock?

2007-11-03 10:14:35 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why are people so afraid of Communist/Socialist countries???

2007-11-03 10:12:23 · 16 answers · asked by Barry F 2

i won't get into why the country was better off before the war, instead i'll ask a different question:

do you think we should invade every country we can that we see as tyrannized? even if the people that are supposedly being oppressed don't invite us over

(including, but not limited to, Sudan, Syria, Iran, Lebanon, Somalia and many other countries in Africa, North Korea, etc.?)

2007-11-03 10:05:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

has she ever mentioned anything about it? what she'll do to help. thanks

2007-11-03 10:04:12 · 13 answers · asked by Ashley 3

other than a 9 trillion dollar debt, and tons of terrorist plots against our country each year (more than before the war began). yes, we haven't been attacked since 9/11, but we've been having lots of terrorist plots each year foiled. by the way, they're not foiled because of the war, they're foiled on the part of internal organizations, like the FBI. if you think that if we leave iraq, the terrorist problem will increase, how do you reconcile the fact that there weren't as many plots against us each year before the war began, than there were after it began?

2007-11-03 09:49:34 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 09:45:19 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

what I mean is ...if people are good and under assault from bad people, will the good people eventually become just as bad or good as the bad people?

2007-11-03 09:36:54 · 7 answers · asked by ron j 1

Should I invest in foreclosures, defaulted consumer debt, destressed Enron bonds, or invest overseas like China and Europe where the economy and currency is strong?

2007-11-03 09:36:44 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

The reason for Bush's rejection by Univ of Texas Law School has never been made public. But it's a pretty good bet that it was because he was a convicted felon at the time or because he did poorly on the Law School Admissions Test, which is a test of IQ in a legal format; or both. It makes one wonder if his current disrespect for the law is rooted in that rejection. Or if he simply has an attitude about law because of that rejection in his youth.

2007-11-03 09:27:23 · 6 answers · asked by golfer7 5

Bush wether you are the ones who support him or not has generated a lot of conspiracy theories about him his tactics his oriegn policy - how he won the election voter nullifications based on race in Florida War or oil etc etc

The list of allegations against Bush seemingly from all sides is huge

Has there ever been a President of the US that has had this much heaped on them in the way of utter disbelief and suspicon of motives and so forth ?

2007-11-03 09:15:08 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I hear a lot of highly emotional claims that global warming is not real and/or a phony issue promoted by liberals and liars for some unclear, but apparently profit motivated reason. Given that the claimed causes of global warming are the same as those that cause pollution and our dependence on Middle East oil, do the ranters and ravers also believe we should ignore these other byproducts of carbon emissions? Are they missing the trees for the forest? Something is missing in the logic behind their emotions, isn't it?

2007-11-03 09:05:39 · 20 answers · asked by golfer7 5

Who are you gonna stick with: the Founding Fathers, or.......... Hillary?

2007-11-03 09:02:43 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 08:56:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

By people who say they are bringing freedom to the whole world?

2007-11-03 08:48:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 08:44:25 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-03 08:33:02 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous