Politics - 25 October 2007

Who watched the news conference from Southern California minutes ago ?
Pretty damn good wasn't it ?

This disaster has been handled very , very impressively by all those involved . Everybody. . . . including the victims who continue to ask not to be called victims !!

What a difference when a Governor is on top of things and LEADS .
And what a difference in the overall attitudes of the NON VICTIMS !!!

Even the Freeloaders Were Had 'Some' Sense of Honor And Left Qualcomm When Asked To Do So !!

New Orleans -- I hope you had your TV's on today . And I hope Jindahls Election Is A Sign of Better Days and Better Attitudes.

What Did You Folks Think ?

2007-10-25 08:48:09 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

the judge involved with the inconvenient truth - al gore - political movives case ruled that the four main ideas of the movie are factual. cons conveniently omit this little tidbit everytime they bring up the case. those four main facts were:

-global warming is real
-people are causing global warming
-people can change their behaviors and reduce global warming
-and that global warming will be a major global concern that will lead to more and more catastrophic changes if not addressed in the near future.

2007-10-25 08:47:13 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-25 08:46:37 · 14 answers · asked by jwr18000 1

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article3075691.ece

Do the weapons manufacturers know something her anti-war supporters don't? (like her voting record)

2007-10-25 08:44:32 · 21 answers · asked by freedom first 5

look i have an open question already the question is (why is hate and racism scaliting against latinos?)and i'm getting a lot of answers most of them are good intelligent answers but some are stupid and ignorant.the classic answer is i don't hate latinos i just hate the illegal ones.how are you gonna know i'm legal or illegal that to me is absurd.the other one is (people should come here legally)how in hell they are gonna do that if it's almost impossible to that.why don't you try changing your laws don't make it so hard for people to come here legally.congress is killing every law that has to do with legalizing latinos.congress are the ones to blame not us.people say that undocumented are the ones getting welfare or they don't pay taxes.that's not true in order for you to get welfare you nee to have a valid social security #.i know people who are here illegally who make their taxes every year they end up getting no money back insted they have to pay.

2007-10-25 08:34:17 · 18 answers · asked by mozz 1

2007-10-25 08:30:52 · 28 answers · asked by justgoodfolk 7

Because they think eggs are chickens?

2007-10-25 08:27:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

His plan to end illegal immigration makes perfect sense to me, but I don't know if he would go through with it. He made NYC a sanctuary city for illegal immigrants when he was mayor.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/2007/10/25/2007-10-25_rudy_giuliani_vows_to_curb_illegal_immig.html

2007-10-25 08:19:47 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

[excluding halliburton, blackwater, and other private companies that have made money off of it]

terrorism is up (mostly only in countries that support the iraq war. ironic, huh?)

the country is in shambles. saddam may have been a cruel dictator, but the fact of the matter is that the country is in a worse shape now than it was before the iraq war. also take note how most iraqis want the u.s. out of their country, as shown by a poll done by the UofMaryland. i figure people will probably call me a liar for stating this, so if you don't believe me, just ask and i'll post the link

and lastly, no WMDs were ever found. therefore no lives were saved from the damage the WMDs would have caused. if anything, lives have been lost: 655,000 iraqi civilians dead as a result of this war and still counting. again, ask for link if you want it. i'm not lying.

2007-10-25 08:19:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Be right back quorum call.

2007-10-25 08:08:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-25 08:06:38 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-25 08:03:56 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-25 08:03:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

"The White House said Thursday that Bush will veto the bill if it reaches him because it does too little to enroll low-income families ahead of those slightly better off, and because it includes a tax hike -- in this case, on tobacco."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071025/ap_on_go_co/children_s_health;_ylt=AsYEVVimj1ED7OEuaLgQonys0NUE

2007-10-25 08:02:01 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

Currently prolifers elect unborn above the born 143 million orphaned children (1), world peace (2), ending slavery (Walmart: the high cost of low prices), valuing family businesses and family farms. These same people who call themselves prolife elect in support of war killing 1 million men, women, and children in Iraq, not counting unborn (2). Prolifers shop in support of unpatriotic big business relocating US jobs to abroad child slavery sweatshops, where children work 16 hours a day 7 days a week for pennies(3). If pro-newborns is going to use the broad name prolife, they better look full spectrum to world peace, ending slavery, adopting Orphans, valuing small family business and family farming. Start valuing orphaned children and women as much as newborns.
Source: 1. Orphanshope.org, 2. (http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,2170237,00.html),
3. Walmart: the high cost of low prices.

2007-10-25 08:01:46 · 14 answers · asked by Mike 4

.
it's just another cable network.
Bleached blondes,
cankles galore,
collagen inflated lips;
makeup galore;
phony laughing; phony jokes..
news but very little substance...

....WHAT, YOU ASK ??

I have the nerve and audacity to put down Fox 5, when other cable networks are basically the same, or worse.

hummm
that is why I keep a remote close by.
NONE of them interest me. I prefer sites from all over the world, right here on line........
Fox may well be your cup of tea
but for others like me
it is exactly this--
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.

.........................nothing..................

2007-10-25 08:01:37 · 14 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

If you don't love him then answer the other question and leave this alone.

2007-10-25 07:58:40 · 8 answers · asked by blase' blahhh 5

2007-10-25 07:58:18 · 38 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

2007-10-25 07:57:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-25 07:52:16 · 25 answers · asked by DOIN' RIGHT AINT GOT NO END 3

2007-10-25 07:51:33 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

The evidence Powell took to the UN was found to be false, Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, yet American re-elected Bush and appear to support another was with Iran. Why haven't the American people done more to bring the troops home?

2007-10-25 07:49:39 · 13 answers · asked by Bobbyjl 2

Get back to work. Now.

2007-10-25 07:46:15 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

This bill would require approx. 22,000,000 new smokers, to generate the tax to fund this program. Willing to light up for the Children, If not the Government will have to absorb the cost if passed?

2007-10-25 07:45:58 · 8 answers · asked by tom 4

This bill would require approx. 22,000,000 new smokers, to generate the tax to fund this program. Willing to light up for the Children, If not the Government will have to absorb the cost if passed?

2007-10-25 07:45:08 · 5 answers · asked by tom 4

2007-10-25 07:41:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-25 07:34:14 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

target on our heads like I do? China and Russia have nukes pointed right at us what's Bush doing about this situation?

2007-10-25 07:33:40 · 17 answers · asked by sally sue 6

2007-10-25 07:31:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

that advancing technology and "globalism" will eventually result in a "one world government"? not in just a few decades, but perhaps slowly over the course of the next century or two. I'm not being a conspiracy nut, just wondering if anyone else thinks that since the world already has a single economy of sorts, that if at some point (if things continue as they are) this will likely result in some actual global unity.

2007-10-25 07:31:01 · 6 answers · asked by Free Radical 5