2007-10-25 08:03:56 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What I want to know is why conservatives are pro-life for child come time in womb but when child is delivered they are not so pro-life as were before?
2007-10-25 16:38:07 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you imply that it's not?
Pro-Life is a stance on abortion, which usually means that the person believes that abortion is killing an unborn, innocent child. I believe that abortion is killing a person but feel that some times it is necessary. Consequently, I am pro-choice because I believe that abortion should be allowed in the case of rape, incest or imminent danger to the mother. I DO NOT believe abortion should be legal as a means of birth control.
Pro-War (if there is such a thing) would be the belief that if a country or country attacks our nation's sovereignty or citizens, we should strike back in the interest of national defense.
Despite your hate filled delusions about this war and it's leaders, nobody takes joy in killing or war. No body is FOR war. Some of us just know that sometimes it is necessary.
"Nobody prays for peace as much as the Soldier, for it is he who must pay the cost of freedom with his blood."
The two are not related in anyway at all.
That's like asking "Why do some claim it is possible to like oranges and toasters?"
2007-10-25 08:24:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because abortion is the violent and unjustified invasion of the womb to literally draw and quarter the most innocent and vulnerable members of our society while war, when justified, protects Americans from our enemies. The only thing that these two practices have in common is that both are avoidable. The first by practicing safe sex or adoption and the second by not threatening or attacking our nation and our people.
Hope that helps.
2007-10-25 08:20:01 · answer #3 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are two different issues. There are huge differences in war deaths and killing innocent babies who can't defend themselves.Also before you throw the Thou shall not kill commandment at me, that verse has absolutely nothing to do with war or capital punishment. Those items are covered in other parts of the Bible. Even if if you don't agree with the Christian view on this , it should be clear to any mature, moral adult that killing your own child is wrong.
2007-10-25 08:21:43 · answer #4 · answered by jim h 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
properly, you asked for it so right here is going. the two positions are consistent in the opposition of evil. the only option is to enable evil via inactiveness. i don't understand what you have been taught approximately why country fights wars however the checklist shows that a minimum of in the 20 th and twenty first Centuries, this country has fought wars to oppose large evil being foisted on harmless people and hazardous the international that's a large and selfless act for which our fallen heroes and veterans could desire to be lauded. Abortion is this style of hideously vile act that maximum people who declare to assist it would by no skill think of of truly partaking in. many that declare to assist it do not even want to understand the main factors of what truly happens. people who declare to be for it additionally say they think of it would be a appropriate yet could desire to be uncommon. What different appropriate do we could desire to be uncommon? I say that's an evil act. in case you think of that's a robust act then you definately could desire to wish extra of it. then you definately could desire to be happy with the tens of millions of pregnancies that have been terminated. They you may desire to desire there have been huge indications proclaiming how many abortions we've served up so far, like McDonald's hamburgers. yet i don't. i think of the type is shameful and the act is evil. it won't be uncommon; it would be ended. there is not something as organic and harmless as a toddler in the womb. To do violence to that individual is an evil and disgustingly vile act. in case you ever observed an aborting performed and the aftermath as a nurse reassembles the tiny human physique to be sure they have been given all of it or observed the deep melancholy and guilt born via many ladies people who had abortions you would be far much less accepting of that distinctive "determination". *
2016-12-15 08:57:18 · answer #5 · answered by vallee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do liberals always take things that are out of context with one another and put them together to try to make a point? There isn't an ounce of intelligence in this question.
Being pro-life refers to being against abortion. It has nothing to do with sending a professional soldier out to do his job. And who says conservatives are pro war? They are pro-problem-solving. And sometimes solving a problem requires war. Freedom ain't free, buddy.
2007-10-25 08:14:02 · answer #6 · answered by skullklipz 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Excellent question! It can not be possible, however the irrational, and illogical justifications are indicative of narrow minded individuals that pick and choose which rules to follow based on their convenience and a twisted justification or thought process. Remember when the Catholic church was on the "Crusades" they slaughtered thousands of people in the name of their religion and they claim to be "pro-life" this is blatant hypocrisy of the highest order.
2007-10-25 08:23:23 · answer #7 · answered by HP 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Two completely separate issues. One can be Pro-Life meaning they are opposed to abortion and at the same time approve of military actions against an enemy i.e Pro-War.
How is it possible to claim to be pro-choice (for the termination of a pregnancy) and anti capital punishment (the termination of a convicted criminal)?
2007-10-25 08:10:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
I can think of a couple of reasons:
1. Ignorance
2. denial
3. a very self-serving view of reality
4. the position follows established party approved delusional
agenda which serves special interest.
5. followers are not encouraged to actually ...t h i n k !
Opps, I listed more than a couple.
2007-10-25 12:06:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't be pro-life & support something that involves taking life. If someone truly believe that, than they are a hypocrate
2007-10-25 11:38:05 · answer #10 · answered by elle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋