2007-10-25 08:46:37 · 14 answers · asked by jwr18000 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeap, he is an infidel as well (according to the terrorists). They did not attack Bush, they attacked the United States.
2007-10-25 08:49:29 · answer #1 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
I even have often theory that if Al Gore had rightfully assumed the Presidency, 9/11 does no longer have occurred in the 1st place. There does no longer have been a 9/11. Why? For one factor, the Bush administration did no longer heed the Clinton administration's warnings to treat terrorism by way of fact the type one precedence. FBI brokers have been instructed to lower back off investigating the Bin Ladens, the enterprise companions of the Bush kinfolk, till after 9/11. additionally till now the election, Gore became on the Senate committee that had recommended to the airlines greater suitable protection measures that secure telling them that they mandatory to fasten the cockpit door on airplanes however the airlines ignored this. If Gore's Presidency had no longer been stolen from the international, i think that the yank intelligence community could have stayed on precise of the Bin laden's, as according to the advice of the outgoing Clinton administration, and according to threat Gore could have viewed to it that he airlines implement those recommendations. and those are in uncomplicated terms some info that i will cite collectively as i'm sitting right here. there are a number of greater.
2016-11-09 11:09:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to tell. Hindsight is always 20/20, but I believe it still may have happened even with Gore in office. The change, however, is that if our Country went into Iraq, it would have been because Iraq would have done something, not because a president wanted to just start up a war with them. We would have completed the job in Afghanistan, and bin laden would have been executed already...
The bad part of all of this? Hardcore Republicans would have been UPSET if Gore went into Iraq the same way bush went into Iraq. That is the hypocrisy of it. Remember Bosnia? Republicans went ape-s**t over it when Clinton was in office, but it's ok to go into Iraq now...
2007-10-25 08:55:34 · answer #3 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would guess that attack was already in motion for at least a year. If Gore had been president, by now, Osama would be the Democrat congressman from California.
2007-10-25 09:20:38 · answer #4 · answered by united9198 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but it would not have happened if Bill Clinton had gone after Bin Laden after the first attack on the WTC back in 1994 when he was susceptible to capture. Make no mistake, Bill Clinton's ineptness lead to 9/11.
2007-10-25 08:54:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Since the vast bulk of the planning was done while Gore was VP, I don't see that he would have done any better than Bush did in stopping 9/11.
2007-10-25 08:50:13 · answer #6 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Yes it would have happened. As I remember at the time they were looking to kill any Americans they could get their hands on. Regardless of who they were and what they believed.
2007-10-25 14:20:12 · answer #7 · answered by Antonio V 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You dont recall the same terrorist tried to blow up the towers when Clinton was in office? Are you too young to remember?
2007-10-25 08:55:25 · answer #8 · answered by One eyed pirate 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yup it's the CFR decide who's going get nominated to further their goals. Gore would have made no difference to that false flag attack happening -- trust none of the CFR crowd.
2007-10-25 08:53:53 · answer #9 · answered by celvin 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
yes. The attack was already planned. The muslims hate us regardless of who is in the white house. They arent going to stop hating us until we submit to sharia law.
2007-10-25 08:49:51 · answer #10 · answered by Brian S 3 · 8⤊ 0⤋