2007-10-25 07:57:10 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, I do not like to disagree with anything said by the great Rory Emerald, but I have to disagree with this one. While I think that George W. Bush is a lot smarter than he is often given credit for being, I think that Thomas Jefferson was the smartest of all of the Presidents!
Excellent Question!!
2007-10-26 12:12:28 · answer #1 · answered by Tony M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This question is entertaining for so many reasons. Thank you for making me smile. First of all, from what I know about Jeb Bush, it's easy to see why he would think his brother was "The smartest president in history". Have you ever watched Lil' Bush? Jeb is represented as, well, not being
too bright. Thanks for adding some humor to my day!
2007-10-25 08:03:33 · answer #2 · answered by Not so looney afterall 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No yet I do accept as true with what Geo. H W Bush mentioned with regards to the foolishness of invading Bagdad we could have been compelled to occupy Baghdad and, in result, rule Iraq. The coalition might straight away have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and different allies pulling out besides. under those situations, in addition to, we were self-consciously attempting to set a development for coping with aggression in the submit-chilly conflict international. entering into and occupying Iraq, consequently unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, might have destroyed the precedent of international reaction to aggression we was hoping to confirm. Had we long gone the invasion direction, the U.S. might desire to conceivably nevertheless be an occupying ability in a bitterly antagonistic land. it would have been a dramatically diverse--and perhaps barren--consequence." appears like besides working the CIA and being a one term president, Bush Sr. became a a fortune teller, for his own youngster different than THAT, i'm specific he's AS ASHAMED OF W simply by fact something human beings, in basic terms ITS HIS SON SO HE won't ADMITT IT
2016-10-14 00:41:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In some ways.
Remember when George Bush mentioned social security in his state of the union a few years ago. He aqskedfor bipartisan study of the issue and bipartisan ideas. He mentioned partical privatization, but only as an idea.?
Instead of offering to help, everybody was running around :"Bush wants to steal your social security!"
Now, with 60 million baby boomers retiring and big problems on the horizon, suddenly Bush looks like a man of vision.
Time will tell.
2007-10-25 08:04:40 · answer #4 · answered by TedEx 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
smartest?
thats an interesting choice of words there, buddy!
2007-10-25 08:00:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's a big fat NO!
2007-10-25 08:03:05 · answer #6 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"childrens do learn."
2007-10-25 08:04:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
smarta$$ maybe..
2007-10-25 08:01:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋