English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 20 September 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

1.Income Disparities
2.Civil Rights Violations
3.Racism (The South East)
4.Police Brutallity
5.Not allowing convicted fellons to get a job to support themselves and their family
6.Patriot Act( Oppresses the American people)
7.Placing people in concentration camps(Ghetto's and Projects)
8.Churches running the Govermant
9.Being Prossecuted for speaking out against King Bush
10.Denying over 40 million Americans Health Care
11.Denying over 100 million children and equal and adequate education for free

2007-09-20 07:28:15 · 17 answers · asked by Freddie 1

who's Margie Schoedinger

2007-09-20 07:24:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

WHY OR WHY NOT????

2007-09-20 07:23:35 · 18 answers · asked by Audi11 3

2007-09-20 07:21:40 · 16 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

2007-09-20 07:20:48 · 10 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

I acknowledge that Global Warming is a reality. The ambient temperature is rising here on Earth.

I also acknowledge that the Earth has gone through warming and cooling cycles throughout it’s past.

I recognize that other planets’ surface temperature have increased as well which can be attributed to increased sun heat/radiation.

I am still not convinced that human activity is to blame for the majority of Global Warming but, I do believe we should do what is within reason to reduce our pollution regardless. However, we should not do so at the cost of our safety (i.e. lighter more dangerous vehicles) nor should we compromise our nation’s ability to produce energy.

I firmly believe that we should aggressively pursue alternative fuel sources and I accept the factual statistical data which establishes the fact that nuclear power is clean and safe.

2007-09-20 07:20:05 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-20 07:19:57 · 20 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

THEY have their protestors TAZERED, but the ACLU and other liberals want enemy combatant terrorists AND illegals treated with respect and kid gloves. Why is that?

AMERICAN unarmed protesters get shocked but liberals want to give free education to illegals and hugs and love to Al Qaeda.

2007-09-20 07:16:28 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

WHY AREN'T WE DOING ANYTHING ABOUT HIM?! I thought this was war on terror...yet the guy who was responsible for the deaths of amewricans on 9/11 is still promoting his plans, and Al Qaeda is getting LARGER. Can someone tell me which terrorists are more important to fight, than this one?

2007-09-20 07:16:14 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hi. Before you answer I'm labour, so I'm not an annoying troll trying to wind you up.

I'm only 15, so I dont know much about politics... but what did Thatcher do in her term in a nutshell? What were the main things, and WHY do people hate her for them? I just want to know more about her.

Thanks a lot ppl - not too much jargon please!!!

2007-09-20 07:10:24 · 34 answers · asked by ღ♥ღ latoya 4

-Corrupt people in power?
-Racism?
-Religion?
-Greed?
-Other?

2007-09-20 07:09:07 · 22 answers · asked by Liberal City 6

...bother anyone else ? They are noble men and women doing great things...But they are NOT Gods, they are NOT superior citizens to anyone else.

This Bush culture of McCarthyism and Complete WORSHIPPING of military is absolutely disgusting, absurd, and anti-American.

2007-09-20 07:06:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Tyrants:
1.Adolph Hitler(Jew)
2.Joseph Stalin(Christian)
3.Mussolini(Catholic)
4.Noreaga(Christian)
5.Melosovich(Christian)
6.Ariel Sharon(christian)
7.George Bush(Christian)

2007-09-20 07:06:49 · 18 answers · asked by Freddie 1

I know so many people who are strongly against the NAU... I know there have been opposing views to certain countries joining the EU, but was there a large public outcry to it when the idea was first posed?

What has been good about the existence of the EU and what has been not so good about it?

2007-09-20 07:05:38 · 9 answers · asked by Lily Iris 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dir1tkQftww

My view is if you are an American, and this video doesn't bother you, you don't deserve to be an American.

2007-09-20 07:01:01 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I personally feel that the NYPD is absolutely correct in saying NO and not just for security reasons. First, he's probably be honoring the hijackers instead of the people that they murdered. Second, his criminal regeim in Iran has been supplying the weapons, training and operatives that have been killing our Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Third, he and his criminal government have been supporting and funding both Hamas and Hezbollah. Fourth, this crumb has stated that the Holocaust didn't happen, that it was somehow faked. Fifth, he was one of the leaders in the takeover at the American Embassy in Tehran after that idiot Carter helped depose the Shah and let the Ayatollah take over.

2007-09-20 06:59:56 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is serious

2007-09-20 06:56:13 · 37 answers · asked by Private Deek 2

I really do respect a politician that is willing to deal with the ills of his own party. I would love to see a Democrat do the same

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2007-09-19-romney-ad_N.htm

EXCERPT FROM ARTICLE:
Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, lays out a tough bill of particulars against his party, portraying Republicans as ethically challenged big spenders and delivering a veiled slap at President Bush and two of his main rivals on the subject of immigration.

"If we're going to change Washington, Republicans have to put our own house in order," Romney says, speaking directly to the camera. "We can't be like Democrats a party of big spending. We can't pretend our borders are secure from illegal immigration. We can't have ethical standards that are a punch line for Jay Leno."

2007-09-20 06:44:07 · 17 answers · asked by Still Beautifully Conservative 5

All I want are honest answers . . . . and maybe just a little bit of thought . I'm not asking you to change your position , I'm just asking you to think .

Notice how there's nothing else posted here ? That's cause I really want you to focus on the question and think about it .

2007-09-20 06:40:24 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm just using two extremes as a cautionary example because there is a general extreme left vs. extreme right environment ruled by the Democrats (left) and Republicans (right).

Extreme Left: leans towards socialist and communist ideals.
Extreme Right: leans towards corporatist and fascist ideals.

2007-09-20 06:40:19 · 27 answers · asked by Think Richly™ 5

I think it would be.

2007-09-20 06:40:02 · 42 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

I watched the documentary "The US vs. John Lennon" last night and was struck that no one has pursued peace as doggedly in these trying times as that reat man did in his day. He didn't care what people thought of him, as long as his message got out.


War is over. If you want it.
Where is that man (or woman) today? Who has the fortitude to speak truth to power and risk the slings and arrows of the right wing slime machine? Is there no one out there?

War is over.

If you want it.

2007-09-20 06:36:26 · 17 answers · asked by Schmorgen 6

2007-09-20 06:29:20 · 19 answers · asked by john 2

"I think I got a B in Econ 101."
- GWB, 9/20/2007

His Yale transcript says otherwise.
Look closely and you'll find his grade was a 71 or 72...
http://2004.georgewbush.org/bios/yale-transcript.asp

All who voted for this C- student, kindly raise your hands.
Thanks!

2007-09-20 06:25:19 · 52 answers · asked by Anonymous

Doesn't this sound like the republican party?

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism

From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights

The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

2007-09-20 06:18:01 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.rense.com/general78/eve.htm

(I realize you probably can't comprehend it through any other lens.)

2007-09-20 06:15:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Cons. I really don't get it. You guys had the run of the place for 6+ years and despite serial incompetence, corruption and morally and financially bankrupting this country, somehow you are still convinced that the Liberal Political and Media Complex exert ultimate power. I mean seriously. Can you give fact-based, rational thought a shot? If nothing more, it would improve your credability.

2007-09-20 06:14:16 · 7 answers · asked by loudwalker 2

Is it possible for intolerant persons to grossly force their beliefs and practices on others, through the political realm?

USA is quite unique in this aspect; we have many various cultures and religions--how do we respect them all individually?

2007-09-20 06:13:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I feel since 911 every muslim is a terrorist by UK white people so much that i want to go to live in muslim state, like Birmingham.

2007-09-20 06:08:56 · 15 answers · asked by HI 2

fedest.com, questions and answers