This is serious
2007-09-20 06:56:13 · 37 answers · asked by Private Deek 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What I mean is will the Arab world stand for such an insult as to have a woman beating them down?
2007-09-20 07:01:25 · update #1
Oh man, are you gonna catch hell for this one.
2007-09-20 07:01:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Your original post makes you look extremely sexist.
You edited it to say that we should appease the terrorists by not voting in the best candidate for the job, so as not to offend Muslims. I might remind you that for a longtime the leading spokesperson and public face for the Palestinian movement was Hanan Ashrawi, a very strong, powerful, and outspoken woman.
2007-09-20 07:49:42 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having a female president might be the best thing that ever happen to America. You never know! And I don't think just because of having a female president we will go to war. Most of the time women have better judgment then men do.
If the Arabs are insulted by a women president beating them down......MORE POWER TO HER!
2007-09-20 07:00:41 · answer #3 · answered by Babiedoll 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Marcos, Thatcher, Gandhi ...plenty of strong women leaders that were under fire and more than held their own.
How can they possible respect Hillary any less than Bush?
Or a troller that asks many questions but never offers anything informative, just rants?
2007-09-20 07:14:35 · answer #4 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Give me one or two good reasons for thinking that? If anything it is the female of the human species that tries to STOP wars not create them. If you are refering to the PMS that is equally stupid. Many millions of women go through their menstral cycles every month without even coming close to starting any sort of fight or war. To presume it would be that way with a woman president is merely showing gender bias and that is pure unadulterated discrimination. Are you a bigot? Your question making certain presumptions seems to indicate that you are.
2007-09-20 07:01:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Nah. Hillary is post menopausal.
And the Arabs are being 'beat down' by our military, not by Bush.
2007-09-20 07:06:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, women are just as capable as men when it comes to executive positions.
However, should Hillary be elected president I am quite concerned that she will basically gut our military to pay for her Utopian socialist agenda while those who have a stated goal of making the United States cease to exist use the opportunity to grow stronger (and yes, these organizations are very real and have been around for much longer than the current administration has).
What's even worse is that I'm not so sure that she cares. In fact, I believe deep down she fervently believes that the US as well as all other nations should be subservient to a socialist world governmental body.
2007-09-20 07:03:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
48 Wars in 4 years? No I don't think we're at risk for that with a female or a male president.
2007-09-20 06:59:06 · answer #8 · answered by Incognito 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
She'll be too busy every month shopping for shoes to start a war....that, or she'll just ignore the problems and hope they go away like she did when her husband had oral sex in the oval office with a 21 year old intern.
2007-09-20 07:06:39 · answer #9 · answered by Eric 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I am not voting for Hillary, only because she is driven by money and is pretty much all the way up the US Corporate a*s.
2007-09-20 07:04:25 · answer #10 · answered by Aquatic Rodent '") 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You are a joke. We are at risk because the lowest common denominator elected or selected a corrupt lying whore Bush. He is a corrupt lying whore everyday.
2007-09-20 07:01:47 · answer #11 · answered by kenny J 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋