THEY have their protestors TAZERED, but the ACLU and other liberals want enemy combatant terrorists AND illegals treated with respect and kid gloves. Why is that?
AMERICAN unarmed protesters get shocked but liberals want to give free education to illegals and hugs and love to Al Qaeda.
2007-09-20 07:16:28 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I dunno but really, Whats more painful, getting tased or listening to John HERO Kerry?
Personally Id rather get tased and in my opinion, it was an easy out your him.
2007-09-20 09:13:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
The protester disobeyed police and resisted arrest. The only one who "had him tazered" was himself.
A bunch of liberals got together 200 years ago and wrote a document called the Bill of Rights. This same document which allows you to post these "questions" guarantees EVERYONE the right to a trial and to face their accuser. You can find it at my link. I suggest you read it, particularly V, VI, and VII.
Politicians pay the illegal issue lip service. All talk and no action.
I try to love everyone, as should all TRUE Christians. If they break the law, they need to be punished. Al Queda falls into that category.
The law is the law. If we don't follow it, we shouldn't expect others to. "Enemy combatants", whether we like it or not, need to be offered the same protections offered to POWs by the Geneva Convention. Otherwise, we are no better than they are and cannot occupy the moral high ground.
2007-09-21 00:29:21 · answer #2 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After reading about that idiot who got tazered, in a way I can understand why. This nutcase is a prankster who was looking for attention and notoriety and I guess he looked in the wrong places.. LOL
As far as the liberals go, I am shocked at some of the things that I'm reading on this site. For instance, many of them think it's GOOD for the the Iranian President, an enemy who supports terrorism and is certainly not a friend of the U.S., to place a wreath at ground zero. What is wrong with these people? Are they that blinded and anti-American? That would be the same as Hitler rising from the dead and placing a wreath in one of his numerous gas chambers.
Astounding!
2007-09-20 08:21:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am not exactly sure if the ideas here work so well. First it's not clear the point except a, liberals are?? conversation. Second, The protester tasered was in my opinion taken by excessive force and those security guards are now on leave here in Florida. Pending investigation. Over reaction, you bet I agree. But terrorists get better treatment? You lost me. Illegal aliens, a huge problem no one wants to face head on. Our politicians give us this, have for years and no one takes any actions on it. Heck Florida is full of them and the list goes on.
Left, right sidewise no one in political office is willing to identify these issues. Look at the new brilliant Democratic Senate & House? 100 days of what?
HUGS & love to ALQaeda? Where did that come from???
Weirdest post I have seen and I respect yours alot. Thanks.
2007-09-20 07:44:23 · answer #4 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sarah Palin dug her own hole by being uninformed, bigger than her britches, cocky, and misleading. Pelosi dug her own too though. But Palin's image is not one I trust in a position of such power like VP or President. She is not a bad woman, but for politics, she is wet behind the ears and still has a lot of learning to do. It does not even matter that I dont agree with 90% of her beliefs, even if I did I would still be very nervous with her anywhere near DC for extended periods of time. Nancy Pelosi is not being treated much differently. Sarah Palin made herself an easy popular culture target, thus making her visability so much more magnified.
2016-05-19 03:39:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the protester was making a *Liberal* uncomfortable. Yes, the protester was becoming belligerent--unlike the docile terrorists who surrender peacefully. And don't forget, the Libs have the terrorists support.
2007-09-20 08:18:06 · answer #6 · answered by Cherie 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, makes you wonder about the Tazers question which was" was Kerry " part of a secret society? ...wonder why these guards felt so inclined to escort this guy out...for literally nothing!
...bet it would go down allot different if a Republican had been speaking and was asked the question...
..Democrats are hypocrites..period!
2007-09-20 11:55:19 · answer #7 · answered by Rada S 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you should do a little bit more research into the story before you come to your assumptions. The AMERICAN that was TAZERED at the Kerry lecture had become BELLIGERENT with the POLICE after he was asked to stand down from the podium after he had been politely asked. The University of Florida was responsible for the security and made the decision to remove the AMERICAN when he refused to follow the protocol established for EVERYONE who was there. If I'm not mistaken, the AMERICAN you speak of was a LIBERAL. For the record, LIBERALS do believe in obeying the laws of society and expect to be served due justice if we step out of line. This has nothing to do with terrorist or the approval of CONSERVATIVES on the Bush Administrations torture policy of terrorist suspects. Not all of those who the Bush Administration has classified as "enemy combatant terrorists" are guilty of being terrorist either.....but have no legal recourse to establish their innocence. The AMERICAN way has in the past assumed "innocent until proven guilty" but it seems that this administration would prefer to say "guilty until proven innocent"....which is the policy that most decent human beings would be opposed to.
The free education you speak of for immigrants I believe is a policy approved by the current administration and party that has been in power for the last 12 years....and I don't believe they call them liberals.
2007-09-20 07:45:10 · answer #8 · answered by Becca 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Other than they're ill , I have no explanation for either their debauchery or treasonous acts .
Now the tolerant libs have invited Achmadinejad to speak to the young impressionable minds at Columbia University !!
I just can't understand them . This is just crazy crazy crazy .
2007-09-20 08:51:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
The socialists such as kerry and clinton have such tight security on their events no one against them can get in, this guy got in because he is one of them, but the socialists are against any form of dissension and I am certain the security were told to shut the guy down regardless.
2007-09-20 09:54:34 · answer #10 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I understand what you are saying. Earlier today someone asked a question regarding Osama and Bush and only one bullet. The answers were frightening.
2007-09-20 11:01:06 · answer #11 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋