English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Doesn't this sound like the republican party?

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism

From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights

The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

2007-09-20 06:18:01 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause

The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite “spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

2007-09-20 06:19:36 · update #1

4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism

Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

5. Rampant sexism

Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

2007-09-20 06:19:57 · update #2

6. A controlled mass media

Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.

7. Obsession with national security

Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting “national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous.

2007-09-20 06:20:19 · update #3

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together

Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite’s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the “godless.” A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.

9. Power of corporations protected

Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure military production (in developed states), but also as

2007-09-20 06:20:42 · update #4

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated

Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts

Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

2007-09-20 06:21:05 · update #5

12. Obsession with crime and punishment

Most of these regimes maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or “traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more police power.

2007-09-20 06:21:50 · update #6

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption

Those in business circles and close to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

2007-09-20 06:22:12 · update #7

14. Fraudulent elections

Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.

2007-09-20 06:22:42 · update #8

16 answers

Honestly, I know the Republicans won't agree, but yes. I am truly convinced that A LOT of Republicans fit those guidelines. And of course, they will NEVER admit it. But just by the way they talk and act, it's completely evident.

2007-09-20 06:26:41 · answer #1 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 6 1

Yeah this is going on right now very scary. All i hear is lets torture, lets kill, we need to bomb the Muslims, we need to behead the liberals, etc.... The guys is power and the ones who support them are the biggest threat to our morals and freedoms. Remember, this is how Nazi Germany started. Jews did not get slaughter the minute Hitler came in. He first passed laws and spread his propaganda for a few years before he violently pursued after the "scapegoat" population. Similar things are going on with eradication of fundamental rights and that stealing of an election was big slap in the face to the American people.

Yes, I am on the watch for fascism. Because even though this is a war against the people, many agree with Bush. And these people are will use these brute tactics, because they themselves are the biggest victims.

2007-09-20 14:29:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Here's the 14 points of Liberalism:

1. Powerful and Continuing Treason -

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights of Citzens killed by their terrorist friends

3. Identification of Enemies as a group to be praised

4. Destruction of the Military

5. Rampant claims of championing sexual equality while giving a wink & nod to a President who routinely raped & harrassed women who worked for him

6. Controlled Mass Media

7. Obsession with destroying National Security

8. Religion and Government are hated equally

9. Corporate Prosperity is Vilified

10. Labor Excesses (like the UAW) are encouraged

11. Disdain for the exercise of common sense/good taste in the Arts

12. Obsession with non-Punishment of Crime

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption

14. Fraudulent Elections

2007-09-20 13:33:12 · answer #3 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 1 6

It sounds like the Bush Administration and maybe even the Christian Right, but not necessarily the Republican Party.

2007-09-20 13:41:31 · answer #4 · answered by BOOM 7 · 2 2

Disdain for the arts? The Nazi's grabbed all the art they could get their hands on. Where did you get this list from? It's easy to build a straw argument against anyone you don't like. But where's the source links? Or is your source too obviously Liberal?

2007-09-20 13:31:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

I agree with you. However, you should know that this question will bring many insults to you because the truth is not popular. Illusions are popular; truth is not.

2007-09-20 13:28:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

I've seen the video for this too. And I totally agree.

2007-09-20 13:59:49 · answer #7 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 3 1

YES I have!

http://www.bushflash.com/14.html

Everyone should! Above is the link!

2007-09-20 13:29:57 · answer #8 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 5 1

It sounds like the plans for the NWO

2007-09-20 13:27:48 · answer #9 · answered by sweet_blonde_laydee 2 · 3 3

Its also known as "My Pet Goat" by GWB. Its his how-to presidential all in one guide.

2007-09-20 13:27:14 · answer #10 · answered by The President 3 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers