I think it would be.
2007-09-20 06:40:02 · 42 answers · asked by Kelly B 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Abortion would be a right guaranteed by law if men were the ones to get pregnant.
2007-09-20 06:43:01 · answer #1 · answered by burghgirl 3 · 6⤊ 8⤋
My ex-wifr tried to trap me. She got a semen sample (I will not go into the details), a few months before we split. She was having an affair and was playing both sides. To cut a long story short, when she made a paternity claim, the court upheld it until such time as I could get a paternity test done. Turned out that the baby was the other guys and she still claimed that I had some kind of moral responsibility to support her after we split. The other bloke did a bunk. I refused, and that was that apart from the death threats and the stalking she did (seriously). She misscarried at eight months. Sad really, but I did tell her that an abortion was an option, and that I would not support the baby from her infidelity. She did try to trap me, and the courts even entertained the idea that if she had "reasonable suspicion" that it could be mine, then I would have to support the child. I had to get a separate court order for a paternity test because she refused to approve one. Gentlemen, don't screw around, it can get you into a whole lot of trouble. Ladies, don't screw around because it can get you into a whole lot of trouble. Same advice. Keeps you safe.
2016-05-19 03:06:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I recommend one to visit this site where onel can compare quotes from different companies: http://HELP-INSURE.NET/index.html?src=3YAupks2ol5La
RE :Would abortion be commonplace and covered by insurance if men got pregnant?
I think it would be.
10 following 42 answers
2016-11-28 20:18:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would recommend that you visit this internet site where you can get rates from the best companies: http://QUOTES-FOR-INSURANCE.NET/index.html?src=2YAjdwnhTL66
RE :Would abortion be commonplace and covered by insurance if men got pregnant?
I think it would be.
10 following 41 answers
2016-08-26 19:08:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know how society would respond, but I do know that I wouldn't think any different about it. In my mind the practice is barbaric and though supported by so many 'progressives' is fit only for the dark ages.
And, in response to the many narrow minded, anti-religion 'progressives', I believe this way and I'm not Christian. You don't have to be Christian to recognize murder when you see it. So it is intellectually vacant to blame such disagreements on a person having faith in a higher being. As an anti-christian atheist, where do you get your values of right and wrong from? They don't come out of a vacuum...no pun intended...do they? So does not believing in God make you, somehow, more right in your thinking? Now doesn't that sound absurd?
2007-09-20 07:00:10 · answer #5 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
First of all it wouldn't take but one man to get pregnant to pass the word around to all others. Then that would put an end to all pregnancies. I don't think it would be common because less men would be pregnant because they couldn't take the childbirth. Some can't even be in the room when their wives are giving birth.
2007-09-20 08:45:52 · answer #6 · answered by God Bless America 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it. A man's psyche is different from a woman's. If men could get pregnant, instead of being bitchy all the time, they would see this as a contest like who can grow the biggest baby or take the largest amount of pain. They would turn pregnancy into a contest like a track event or other sports event and goad each other. Then they would have no remaining sympathy at all for women and would not need them anyway.
Men thrive on challenge, competition, and tolerance of pain-as in no complaining and crying. It is just like gardening. Men try to grow the 50-pound tomato, the six-foot zucchini, the one-ton pumpkin. Women approach gardening like it is hard brutal work that has to be done like a never-ending chore. If men were able to bear babies, would they be more sympathetic and more understanding to women? No. Instead, men would make it look easy and then there would be no tolerance of women whatsoever. It would only make more trouble for women and make them useless in everyday life.
With men taking on pregnancy like it is a competition, abortion would be frowned on further, and feminista nazis would be even more angrier than they are today.
2007-09-20 07:06:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
If men got pregnant then women would be working and men would be at home .
We would of repressed mens sexuality so that he would have difficulty achieving an orgasm and feel dirty about it .
He would be high strung and moody and be of less value in the work place .
He would be a completely different animal all together .
I would think that those in power would feel the same as they do now . The more people the more profit to be made so decreasing a population always has a bad effect for the rich . SO no way would abortion be any more accepted then it is now .
2007-09-20 06:49:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 3⤋
Not speaking for others, but my position on shagging... I've been lied to more times than I can count (by women) who have said they're using birth control and I find out later they weren't.
Whether they claimed they were on birth control and wanted to 'feel the real me' or not I still used condoms.
Would abortion be commonplace and covered by insurance if I got pregnant? No.
2007-09-20 06:58:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Yes, I believe it would be commonplace and covered by insurance. If men could get pregnant, there would have been a law on the books a long time ago, guaranteeing the right to an abortion.
2007-09-20 06:48:57 · answer #10 · answered by ~RedBird~ 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
For free insurance quotes
2015-01-01 06:18:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋