Politics - 11 July 2007

Well i think it was just a time of horiblie stuff. i mean all the killing!

2007-07-11 04:40:19 · 13 answers · asked by Kitty 1

Why,why,why can't we see the value for the dollar being spent in Iraq, what deal!

2007-07-11 04:37:59 · 12 answers · asked by edubya 5

neocom-neocommunist-liberal

2007-07-11 04:33:46 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.afa.net/snopesiswrong.asp

2007-07-11 04:32:51 · 3 answers · asked by Cherie 6

been paid to it because Bush had the information about it suppressed?

2007-07-11 04:31:04 · 16 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5

BARACK! BARACK! BARACK!

2007-07-11 04:30:54 · 14 answers · asked by Shannon! 5

I considered George Bush one of the greatest Presidents we ever had on September 11th, 2001. He remained calm when he was told about it, he made an awesome speech that rallied the nation that night, and for once in our history, almost every country on the globe was our friend. I was never prouder to be American on 9/11/2001. But, Bush blew it on March 20th, 2003 when US troops invaded Iraq. He changed his story many times about why we were over there, like how Saddam aided al-Qaeda, Saddam had WMDs, etc. The world grew angry with the US and is still angry with us to this day because we are in a war that should not have even happened, or if it did, our troops should have been out years ago. Had Bush never lied about Iraq and had he never invaded, he might have been one of the best Presidents in history when he left office and left a great legacy. Instead, he leaves with a legacy that surrounds the Iraq War.

2007-07-11 04:23:21 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Should it really be up to the government or laws if

-we want people to start treating the environment with care?

-we want our children to learning something in schools and become competitive in the international range?

-we want human beings to live equally with each other?

explain.

Furthermore, feel free to disagree with me. I won't hold it against you

2007-07-11 04:21:42 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was watching a documentary on the History channel last night, and to me it seems like a solid arguement that increased industrial activity and growth has put tons more CO2 in the atmosphere, trapping in the Sun's rays.

I know the Sun is getting brighter and the Earth naturally changes, but even a 2 degree increase in global temperature has exponential effect like the oceans rising 3 feet.

I don't want to talk about Al Gore here so please don't bring him up, I'm talking about melting ice caps, rising oceans, and greenhouse gases, CO2.

What part of Global Warming do skeptics say is not real?

2007-07-11 04:16:33 · 13 answers · asked by ? 6

What is the down side to building a wall and closing our southern border?
Wouldn't closing that border stop a large about of illegal drug trafficking also?

2007-07-11 04:10:09 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

and diversity.

It means I am conversing with a parrot.

What words do you roll your eyes at?

2007-07-11 04:04:26 · 18 answers · asked by fourthy27 2

general question.

2007-07-11 04:03:08 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think that Bush did believe Iraq had WMD's as well as most of the Dems and the Clinton administration. Whether they did at the time of invasion is debateable but then again I am not privy to all information as well as the American people. So I dont go for the whole "Bush lied" game. Do I believe he is ignoring the will of the American people? Yes! Do I believe it is a no win situation? Yes! Now I do believe that there are evil people in this world who hate us and no matter what we do terrorism will always be a threat. It is something we should always guard against and sometimes take an offensive action when all other means have been exhausted. The life of every American citizen is precious and should never be taken advantage of. Although I do not agree the path we are taking I still love this country and what it can represent. This country use to be a beacon of hope to the world and maybe it can be that again.
Your thoughts?

2007-07-11 03:52:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Are we polarizing ourselves here on YA? I first got on here for a true political discussion and I find myself always being pulled into a blind loyalty to my preconceived notions, not willing to question them in the face of opposition. I have also looked at my contacts/fans and they are individuals who will agree with me on nearly every issue. Im not sure if this is how it is for anyone else. I wanted to have a real q and a with people who also had a different opinion and were willing to explain, rationally, there position. I find that rarely here.

Am I just in the wrong place?

2007-07-11 03:52:28 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

They fear that the price of these talks would be U.S recognition of Iran's dominant role in the Persian Gulf.

Who else?

2007-07-11 03:50:59 · 9 answers · asked by Page 4

Do you think he has more good than harm to the country/world? Please support your arguement.

2007-07-11 03:50:52 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

preach responsibility - when none will take responsibility for Bush - and are now trying to disown him?

2007-07-11 03:49:55 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's possible.

http://www.cleveland.com/open/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1184142829146230.xml&coll=2

2007-07-11 03:44:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

.. then they ought to LOVE George W. Bush, since he's doing all he can to ruin it!

Liberals don't hate America. It's clear that so-called "conservatives" do.

2007-07-11 03:43:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-11 03:38:11 · 1 answers · asked by asaki 1

give some good reasons

2007-07-11 03:36:52 · 16 answers · asked by billybutsky 4

Is Hillary Clinton just Hugo Chavez in drag?? She seems to be as staunch a socalist as he is, and dislikes our President (and possibly our country) even more. What happened to personal responsiblity??

2007-07-11 03:30:55 · 26 answers · asked by Russ 2

2007-07-11 03:29:37 · 11 answers · asked by Page 4

I am an adament independent. The one thing I have noticed from watching these posts is the fact that most Dems are willing to embrace change/new ideas that could help our country, while most GOPs are so focused on bashing any new idea that hasn't come from the president. GOPs seem content sticking to slogans and concepts conceived by the GOP leadership. I see a complete lack of any independent thought.

2007-07-11 03:29:06 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Shouldn't we listen to the Iraqi government?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070709/pl_n...

Sure there are problems, but if the Iraqi government thinks that there will be a civil war if we leave then should we just abandon the Iraqi people?

So not to mention the harm these people might cause to us later on, they will also cause immediate harm in the area.

If people are so worried about these peoples rights when they live here and get searched in an airport, why don't they care that if we leave the Iraqi people are going to be in a much worse situation than they already are in.

2007-07-11 03:29:03 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

That's not the whole question , that's all that would fit .

Since 9/11 , Liberals have been bashing our government for not being ready enough , alert enough , and for not alerting our citizens of a possible attack . Now we can argue all day long about how the current administration had only 8 months to grasp everything Clinton couldn't grasp in 8 YEARS , but let's save that for another question .
But here's the point ......Each and every time our government tells us of information they have about a possible attack the Liberals not only downplay it , ho ho ho , pffft , no , they instead claim that the government is fear-mongering for alerting them ????
Now we just may be facing a new round of attacks and if Liberals continue their insolent ways and their ambivalence , then just how can we expect any of them to report anything suspicious and out of the ordinary ? Everything's a big joke to them . Everything's got to be a conspiracy .

How Does That Jive With Their Previous Cries ?

2007-07-11 03:26:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

We USED oil assets to help fund the war, but that is not the primary reason we are there:

-Bush stated Iraq, Iran, North Korea as "Axis of Evil"

- US must strike first against another state to prevent POTENTIAL threats from growing into an ACTUAL one.

-Challenges UN to ENFORCE its own Resolutions (1441, look it up)

- 11 undeclared empty chemical warhead found in Iraq proving it NEVER disarmed weapons

-Iraq ordered to destroy its Al Samound 2 missliels by deadline

-Bush warns Hussein to leave country or face an attack (and you know the rest)

Can, someone PLEASE explain to me why people think that we are in Iraq soley for oil? Iraq is in the middle east, a region known for its civil unrest and endless violence. With the Iraq takeover, this ensures that there would be some sort of stability in that area.

please note, I do not agree with the war but we ALL need to understand the reasons.

2007-07-11 03:25:05 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Our borders have been wide open since 9/11. The terrorists are suicidal, so fear of dying in the attempt to get into the U.S., with or without weapons, dirty bombs, nukes, etc., would not be a factor.

2007-07-11 03:20:47 · 22 answers · asked by wooper 5

Delgadillo for wasting our tax dollars and Lee Baca for sending Paris home because of so called claustrophobia.
There is a website for this. Would you vote for the recall? Why/ Why not?

2007-07-11 03:09:20 · 2 answers · asked by greysfan 3

he RIGHT????????????

2007-07-11 03:08:28 · 15 answers · asked by Page 4