Is Hillary Clinton just Hugo Chavez in drag?? She seems to be as staunch a socalist as he is, and dislikes our President (and possibly our country) even more. What happened to personal responsiblity??
2007-07-11 03:30:55 · 26 answers · asked by Russ 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Chavez doesn't need to put on a fake southern twang while pandering for the black vote.
2007-07-11 03:36:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary floats with the winds of public opinion , her only goal is to get more power and power is money ! Most all the congressional people are socialist to a point . They love drama , that keeps the public eyes off reality . And the fact that congress nor the president has done anything to improve your life or safety in the past 20 years , This should be enough to make you mad as hell , but you keep voting the same worthless bums back in to office ...
2007-07-11 10:47:42 · answer #2 · answered by buddy u 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Socialist? The only thing remotely 'socialist' is her wanting to fix our money driven health care system. Our health care sucks.
I would never vote for her...because she is a woman (duh)
but...for the past 3 years, how well is our presidents ratings doing?
Because I think the president is a retarded third grader, and Hillary wants to reform health care,and another 60% of or country dislikes our president...we hate our country.
Congratulations on being naive. Stop thinking "OMG Bush told me that Saddam has WMDs and because I dont know a thing about Socialism or Haliburton or Oil or Health Care or my Country I am entitled to being a moron"
You probably think putting a timetable on Iraq means we dont support our troops. I'd rather support my troops by bringing them home then lead them into a war based on false information for financial benefit.
Hitler.
2007-07-11 10:45:14 · answer #3 · answered by Jack D 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
she is a manipulator..there are several models out there for her to follow..but having the most chips is what she is all about.
she can't do it without the support of George Soros..so what do you think he and his shadow gov't have in store for this country..
the guy that said don't be naive..well he's moved on to another question and will continue to worship at the
alter of divine pillage..they have UN grand designs..
there is an article in The Atlantic everyone needs to read..to see what Hillary, George, The Open Society, and Take Back America..have in store..and you know one end result is wealth for George and Hillary..when the world view is that
mankind is a global market
2007-07-11 10:56:29 · answer #4 · answered by UMD Terps 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Step back and take a breath, I wont vote for Hillary either but its not because of anything she said or what a republican said. Its because I am tired of the Clinton's and The Bush's Time for someone else to run the country. The fighting goes on and on. She is not a socialist far from it Bush is more of a fascist then she is a socialist . Look to someone else besides rush for your questions. Look up the words socialist and fascist and see who fits.
2007-07-11 10:41:19 · answer #5 · answered by margie s 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If you want to know the skinny on Hillary Rodham Clinton, check out a book "Hell to Pay" , written by Barbara Olson who tragically died in the plane crash into the Pentagon on 9-11. You will find out how she went from being a "Goldwater Girl" in 1964 to being an avowed Marxist under the tutelege of Saul Alinski @ Wellesley. This woman is dangerous!! There are as of late, numerous books that have been written about her & none of them flattering - even by liberals such as Carl Bernstein.
2007-07-11 10:40:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, Hugo Chavez is WAY hotter than Clinton! But, I'd like to see Clinton in a cat-suit!
MEOW!
2007-07-11 10:35:24 · answer #7 · answered by nom de paix 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It is impossible to say. Nobody can tell any more when she is speaking her mind /vs/ pandering.
As an ex-board member for Wal-Mart and with her land deals, it seems clear that she is not opposed to capitalism. The only question now is whether she believes in free trade for just herself, or for everybody.
2007-07-11 10:42:19 · answer #8 · answered by the_defiant_kulak 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, Chavez got to where he is on his own. Hillary was handed he place to speak out with her crap.
2007-07-11 10:49:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You may have a point. This reminds me of what a Marine recently told Chelsey Clinton when asked if he was ever afraid. He said, "I only fear 3 things; Osama, Obama...and yo mama!"
2007-07-11 10:50:18 · answer #10 · answered by Granny Gruntz 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What's with all the Clinton bashing? You all need to start focusing on your grassroots operation to get Romney in, and get that Guiliani Goon out if you care about the election.
2007-07-11 10:37:03 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋