That's not the whole question , that's all that would fit .
Since 9/11 , Liberals have been bashing our government for not being ready enough , alert enough , and for not alerting our citizens of a possible attack . Now we can argue all day long about how the current administration had only 8 months to grasp everything Clinton couldn't grasp in 8 YEARS , but let's save that for another question .
But here's the point ......Each and every time our government tells us of information they have about a possible attack the Liberals not only downplay it , ho ho ho , pffft , no , they instead claim that the government is fear-mongering for alerting them ????
Now we just may be facing a new round of attacks and if Liberals continue their insolent ways and their ambivalence , then just how can we expect any of them to report anything suspicious and out of the ordinary ? Everything's a big joke to them . Everything's got to be a conspiracy .
How Does That Jive With Their Previous Cries ?
2007-07-11
03:26:44
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
ANY of you who wish to see proof of what I'm saying should simply click on my profile and read the insolent answers to my last question about this !!! There's GINORMOUS proof ! (Ginormous - a new word added to the dictionary)
2007-07-11
03:30:17 ·
update #1
AC1BD - You are too funny. . . or maybe ignorant. .. or maybe blind . My proof is posted for you to check-out for yourself . BTW , after you read it , I'd love to see some acknowledgment and honesty . Mmmmk !!
2007-07-11
03:34:21 ·
update #2
Its not just blame on the Bush administration for 8 months of not being able to figure our the problem but for all the other administrations since the 70's who put us there and did not do the real legwork that was needed to prevent 9-11. Nothing the Bush administraion did short of guessing right on one day our of 365 that oh here is the threat overload that makes us shut down the system to ensure the american people are safe today. Protection is impossible in that you have to be right 100% of the time they only need to be right 1% to kill thousands if not millions. The odds in Las Vegas are better than that.
I get really mad with liberals when they say where are the attacks coming like when we would not give full data to Chicago and a few other cities and the mayor/etc go off on the administration to give them a full warning no matter what the threat level and then when you do give a warning that proves to be not made or low on a possibility you are down trodden also by the libs and their media heina dogs. And do not get me started on complaining about how they want no secrets to be kept from anyone on defense actions taken like the wire taps or financial traces, then the terrorists can go back to the method or just find a new one to use to get us in the end. DOES anyone believe that we did not have major secrets during WWII to defeat the Nazis and Japanese that still have not seen the light of day but were crucial to the win for us and saving countless lifes here and throughou the world.
2007-07-11 03:52:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
It is simple. Any price for power. Their voters will not only accept a total turn around on issues but will applaud them for being so much more informed than Bush.
Why do you think totalitarian governments last? The majority of people don't want responsibility or choice, they simply want to be told what is and be entertained or left alone. If you tell these automatons they are a part of a great thing they will surrender all to the cause and never look past what they are told.
This is why Media is referred to as the fourth estate of government. They control what the people are told and by that what they will demand .
2007-07-11 10:46:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
First of all, you needn't be a liberal to think President Bush is incompetent, that seems to be the notion around here.
Secondly, liberals have always been whacked out. That is nothing new. But in the same sense, there are a number of conservatives who are just as whacked out as many liberals.
I would have to agree that whacked out liberals are a little more unnerving than whacked out conservatives.
The situation with anti-government liberals was far worse in the 1960s and 1970s than it is today, in my opinion. So, I really wouldn't worry all that much about them.
2007-07-11 10:46:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Overt Operative 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Liberals have perfected the art of never being wrong. 9/11 was Bush's fault. 9/11 happened because we angered mild mannered Muslims. It couldn't have been prevented by their precious Bill Clinton. This is why Liberals cannot be trusted with our National Security.
We need to be vigilant.
2007-07-11 11:01:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Matt 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because anything that is done by The current administration is wrong. Bush says red, Libs scream green. Bush says High , Libs scream low. It makes it easy for them to respond to anything that Bush does, they don't have to put any thought into it and they think they are right, because they are getting positive reinforcemnet from all the other mindless anti-Bush zombies chanting the same things.
2007-07-11 10:33:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by booman17 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
It was liberals who suggested we close cockpits on airliners in the 70's After Hijackers started using planes to make statements .
You have to ask yourself would 9-11 have happened if we had listened to some radical liberals in the 70"s .
Those same radical liberals complained and told people the CIA was going around the world assassinating people and now we know its true .
Radical liberals suggested we give women the right to vote . that we free the slaves that we end separate but equal .
Liberals have safeguarded this nation by pushing to get out of Vietnam .I bet we would still be their if it was not for the Liberals . Hey but who am I to complain about conservatives who are never up to speed on anything and live in the past refusing to change .
Your right without a good war going on or the threat of one millions would be out of work . We promised those kids in the 70's if they went to school and got educated there would be jobs for them .
Well the government kept its promise and now over 30 million people work directly or indirectly for the government . Our taxes and national debt have going through the roof and every american on average is worse off then we were in 1963 .
2007-07-11 10:40:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
they sold out..they sold out to forces greater than the realize..
George Soros and Hillary Clinton have a pact..forget Bill
Bill had his time..we're coming on Hillary's opportunity to make it ...or break it
most subscribe to the notion.."only say what you mean"
this is all about shameless desire to dominate..
there is no virtue in looking to refurbish the entire financial and social landscape..when it is a fact..nobody starves..nobody goes without healthcare..the people on the streets..have the right to do something about their plight
it doesn't take a village to do very much..for anyone..
in America..the dream is what you the individual makes of it
2007-07-11 10:39:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by UMD Terps 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
The liberals have been spoon fed the "I hate Bush" propaganda and they follow it like blind sheep. They will believe/make up anything negative about our government to suit their own agenda. But God forbid we use more than one square of toilet paper.
2007-07-11 10:41:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Their unconditional hate for Bush, eclipses everything else. That's why.
Common sense has been tossed out of the window.
2007-07-11 10:30:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
0⤋
But what if? You have to be able to see that whether or not the terrorists strike or our own government strikes, we are still living under oppression and fear. More oppression by the government either way,is still inevitable.
2007-07-11 10:49:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
0⤊
3⤋