Politics - 2 July 2007

this is basically what i think of you if you support wire tapping, airport security etc...

"Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin

2007-07-02 04:51:35 · 23 answers · asked by hades 3

What do you think about your fellow supporters who advocate using terroristic tactics on fellow americans? Like Michael Moore, Rosie O'Donnell, etc...do you support terrorism as long as it is aimed at the democrats?

2007-07-02 04:37:41 · 3 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

It seems that Britain has fallen victim to a string of terrorist attacks and terrorist attempts in the last 2 years. Amazingly though, arrests are made within days and sometimes hours of these attacks & planned attacks. Could it be because of the broader use of wire taps? Cameras on every street corner? More aggressive investigating? So what's the problem with using the same tactics here to prevent terrorst attacks BEFORE they happen? Why is it okay for Britain to employ these tactics and gain praise from the international community, while liberals BLAST our government for the implementation of Patriot Act?

2007-07-02 04:32:36 · 26 answers · asked by ? 3

he realizes that very few republicans would be able to differentiate (sorry tell the difference) between Obama and Osama and assume (sorry make decisions without facts)
that he is a Arab Muslim Islamofacist?

2007-07-02 04:31:38 · 16 answers · asked by JF 3

2007-07-02 04:18:26 · 13 answers · asked by Page 4

http://www.isna.ir/Main/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-952735&Lang=E

TEHRAN, July 02 (ISNA)-Writer, producer and director, Michael Moore is to come to Iran for the screening of his new production SICKO in the first international documentary film festival held here.


This festival will be held from the 15th to the 19th of October in Tehran.

2007-07-02 04:15:19 · 42 answers · asked by Anonymous

If he is running for both, will he use SOCIALISM to bring them together.

2007-07-02 04:06:37 · 14 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/06/30/MNGSCQOVNF1.DTL

Pelosi lays blame for missed goals on Senate
(06-30) 04:00 PDT Washington -- The problem for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi isn't just President Bush. It's the Senate.

Pelosi sounded more apologetic than celebratory Friday when she announced with her Senate counterpart, Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democrats' list of accomplishments six months after they seized control of Capitol Hill and promised "a new direction" in Washington.

"I'm not happy with Congress, either," Pelosi, of San Francisco, conceded.

2007-07-02 04:02:51 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

If a girl is required to give parental notification when obtaining an abortion, should the boy who got her pregnant have to give HIS parents notification too? SHould parents of boys who get a girl pregnant have the right to know that their son got a girl pregnant?

2007-07-02 03:56:34 · 24 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

2007-07-02 03:55:52 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself! Someone please tell CNN, FOX, MSNBC that... I've never seen so much coverage about a Jeep on fire in SCOTLAND!!! You'd think it was the end of the world.

Meanwhile in my city 4 people were murdered last weekend... Gee which shall I worry about more...

2007-07-02 03:50:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

What are the similarities between Hillary Clinton and Ann Coulter? They remind me of each other when I see them on TV.

2007-07-02 03:45:53 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Child Custody Protection Act makes it a federal crime to transport a minor across state lines for the purpose of obtaining an abortion. Is a better choice letting the female do it herself or from an untrustworthy source, like someone with no medical experience or a coat hanger? And if all lives are gifts, why is it okay to "kill" some and not others? (in your opinion).

2007-07-02 03:40:50 · 27 answers · asked by guess 5

I got the impression that both Bush and Kerry got up there and said "I can be bought with a price, who is the highest bidder??" - as long as candidates will change on a whim just to please whoever pays them the most our country is in severe trouble. We need men or women to be our leaders that have integrity - that can't be bought.


Is this just my imagination or am I reading Bush/Kerry correctly. ???

2007-07-02 03:39:30 · 2 answers · asked by art_flood 4

Even if he sucked as president, there is no way he is worse than bush. Its funny to see Hannity talking points being parroted on YA! Is that the only defense cons have, to trash carter and clinton?

2007-07-02 03:37:38 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070702/ts_nm/iraq_usa_murder_dc

The sane, moral person would look at these atrocites and put political beliefs aside to say that it was wrong. But there are Americans who are willing to allow the cover up so as to not hurt the US's reputation. Has these types of Americans reached a new low in morals all for political reasons?

2007-07-02 03:32:53 · 13 answers · asked by Jerry H 5

Some say Bush is. I think it was Grant. Maybe William Henry Harrison. What do you all think?

2007-07-02 03:22:03 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

the price of owning a home is also on the rise, and I am sure there are millions of people who are sick or renting. So along with making sure everyone has healthcare, why not ensure that everyone has a home?

In fact, why don't 100% of our tax dollars support every single American rich or poor? does that sound like a good idea or do I sound as delusional and misinformed as some of these libs?

2007-07-02 03:17:33 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will anyone ask them, how many jobs will be lost when a nationalized heathcare system is put in place? Wouldn't government run healthcare put health insurance companies out of business?

2007-07-02 03:07:39 · 6 answers · asked by gerafalop 7

There is no right or wrong answer,it is not about whether it is a good idea. How much do you pay for your insurance and health care overall?

2007-07-02 03:06:54 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Afterall folks, they are Republicans ... with a real inner sense of getting to the very heart and soul of the crucial issues facing all Americans today.

You see them on here daily and to a large extent, they are receiving a check from the republican underground to divert your focus from what they are really doing to the United States ... attempting to marginalize those with brave, rational thought ... and cater to the fears and prejudices inherent in their base of supporters.

In responding to their inflammatory questions, the best thing to do is NOT respond. But, begin your own series of questions that addresses the true issues ... in an intelligent and articulate way.

Secondly, the Republican underground would love to restrict your informed and intelligent commentary to these buried forums ... it is important to advance your political thoughts to the water coolers at your workplace, your neighbor's fence, and your carpool. We must fight for the minds of every independent.

2007-07-02 03:03:01 · 12 answers · asked by HillBillieNot 3

Nobody wants goverment Health care.........Geez..

Get a clue folks.

In an extensive ABCNEWS/Washington Post poll, Americans by a 2-1 margin, 62-32 percent, prefer a universal health insurance program over the current employer-based system. That support, however, is conditional: It falls to fewer than four in 10 if it means a limited choice of doctors, or waiting lists for non-emergency treatments.

2007-07-02 02:56:46 · 18 answers · asked by Dina W 6

http://www.who-sucks.com/politics/12-reasons-why-mitt-romney-sucks#more-44 http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1638065,00.html http://www.reason.com/news/show/121088.html

2007-07-02 02:50:02 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

I did not know that he uses Yahoo Answers.

2007-07-02 02:49:30 · 6 answers · asked by guess 5

people that give you a logical answer to your questions? Does honest debate scare you?

2007-07-02 02:42:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

If USA and Israel say that they defend all Jews and that the existence of Israel prevents another Holocaust, why didn´t these countries defend those 2,000 Jews slaugthered in Argentina by a ( US backed , Ford -Reagan, ) military dictatorship.Was it because all that Jews were marxist activists,if that is the reason,well ... it can happen again and again , as Jews will always side to the left.

Partial list of Jews slaughtered in Argentina during 1976-1977.
May be you can find some of your kin in this list.

http://www.desaparecidos.org/arg/victimas/judios/lista.html

2007-07-02 02:39:10 · 4 answers · asked by Señor Spok 1

I always hear about what's on these web sites, but I never seem to be able to find the real thing...just comments about them. Any clues on how to access this stuff?

2007-07-02 02:38:55 · 1 answers · asked by Noah H 7

that terrorism is better fought with the police, than the military?

2007-07-02 02:33:14 · 16 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

Does anyone really doubt these terrorist groups would use WMD if they got their hands on it? Instead of three of four planes into buildings, they would love to have a nuke to set off in New York or LA.

Why is it so hard for some people to realize the gravity of this threat? Why are some people inclined to give people like Saddam and Iran the benefit of the doubt? Don't they care about the security of their children?

2007-07-02 02:31:22 · 9 answers · asked by Philip McCrevice 7

Do we pay higher taxes?
Are employers exempt from paying healthcare (because healthcare is now a government responsibility)
Does that mean government will get bigger?

What do you think?

2007-07-02 02:28:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous