English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 2 July 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

1. Because they have, post JFK, been taken over by anti USA leftist like Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan they will NOT defend the country from foreign enemies.

2. They will gut the military and intelligence services to pay for all the handouts they promise their supporters.

3. They always raise taxes. Every time without fail. JFK was the last dem to CUT taxes.

4. They are hostile to people of religious faith.

5. They are the pro gay marriage and abortion on demand party.


The republicans are FAR from perfect but that does not mean people want us to be like CANADA. No military and never ending entitlements.

2007-07-02 06:12:26 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Wasn't your great grandfather an immigrant?

2007-07-02 06:12:15 · 7 answers · asked by Catch 22 5

2007-07-02 06:11:27 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

What should the criteria be?

2007-07-02 06:05:36 · 3 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

-all 10 million New Yorkers evacuate the city ASAP?
-Would they all blow it off as Al Qaeda trick?
-Where would they all go to live?
-How long would they all have to stay away from the city?
-How would such an economic catastrophe of shutting down NYC indefinitely be handled?
-How much worse would it be than 9/11 would it be (how bad would be to try and get 10 million New Yorkers out of the city all at the same time?)

-And last but not least what if it was all a hoax?

Is the threat of a terrorism worse than an actual terror attack & should Americans be controled by the fear of terror or should they do more to control/manage that fear so Bin Laden can't launch terror attacks w/o even having to attack the US?

2007-07-02 06:01:06 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is that the excuse the GOP wants to give for Bush disbanding the group looking for Bin Laden? THAT's the reason? You hate Clinton, so why not act just like him? Really? Seriously?

2007-07-02 05:49:30 · 1 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

~ Adolf Hitler

(Speech of May 1, 1927. Quoted by Toland, 1976, p. 306)

"I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe" Hillary in 1996 From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 76 - Hillary in 1996)

"Many of you are well enough off that [President Bush's] tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."(Hillary grandstanding at a fund raising speech in San Francisco; SFGate.com 6/28/2004.)

2007-07-02 05:49:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-02 05:47:36 · 25 answers · asked by Catch 22 5

Saying "it's religion so explanation is inapplicable" isn't good enough. That's a cop-out. The very idea that religion needs to be defined as outlandish, insubstantial things is a logical fallacy. For example, although men can fake documents and lie about texts, they cannot create mountains and stars -- therefore, it makes more sense to think of nature as something divine.
It is those who make the most spectacular claims that have to provide the most spectacular evidence and logic. It is not secularists that have to disprove anything (they are not claiming to know things that cannot be known) but rather the religious who have 100 percent of the burden of proof. If they cannot do it, then they warrant no consideration or interest from anyone.

2007-07-02 05:38:34 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

companies are now allowed to discriminate against smokers and not hire us? Should we not be eligible for disability benefits? Since it is getting more and more difficult to find a job? and quitting is next to impossible for some smokers, shouldn't we have the ability to go on disability?

2007-07-02 05:35:13 · 11 answers · asked by RubyUnicorn 3

A.Mc cain
B.Fred thompson
C.Mitt romney
D. Rudy giuliani

2007-07-02 05:32:01 · 8 answers · asked by geyamala 7

Last year he announced that the group looking for Bin Laden was disbanded. What will he announce this year regarding the war on terror?

2007-07-02 05:29:40 · 13 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

.... The Tao Te Chang, The Republic, The Bible or The Prince.

Please pick one of the four and then feel free to suggest something else if you like.

2007-07-02 05:28:14 · 8 answers · asked by megalomaniac 7

My grandma seems to think that Bill will take over and I disagree with her on that. Maybe because I've been studying politics and maybe because I think Hillary is stronger than my grandma thinks, and perhaps I've been paying better attention to the election 2008 stuff.

2007-07-02 05:24:25 · 14 answers · asked by suesue 5

1) You believe the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of funding.

2) You are against capital punishment, but for abortion on demand, in short you support protecting the guilty and killing the innocent.

3) You believe that the same public school teacher who can't teach 4th graders how to read is qualified to teach those same kids about sex.

4) You believe that trial lawyers are selfless heroes and doctors are overpaid.

5) You believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than nuclear weapons in the hands of the Red Chinese.

6) You believe that global temperatures is not affected by cyclical, documented changes in the Sun, but is really affected by SUVs.

7) You believe that gender roles are artificial but being gay is natural.

8)You believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.

9) You believe that hunters don't care about nature but animal rights activists who've never been outside Seattle do.

2007-07-02 05:22:56 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Some would say standing in line at the airport for three hours and having our phones tapped and cameras on every corner to prevent crime and stop terrorism is acceptable .
Others would like to go much further by forcing people to obtain a license to own or purchase materials that could be used in making weapons .
We already restrict how much sudafed one can purchase .
Will ammo be restricted to 20 rounds soon . Will my right to bare arms be infringed all for the so called good of all people .

Once a line is drawn it seems as if it keeps moving in a direction away from freedom and more towards repression .

If torture works great for stopping terrorists then how long till its used to make say a child pornographer to provide a client list .
A drug dealer to give up the names of his suppliers .
Or maybe the mechanic that modified the engine in your car when we have chips installed to prevent people from exceeding 85 mph ending high speed police chases .
Where is a good line drawn

2007-07-02 05:22:33 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

PLEASE! Explain to me when we decided to not go after those responsible for 9/11, how this war on terror that spawned after 9/11 didn't include finding Bin Laden?!

2007-07-02 05:21:24 · 15 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

Why can't the left just accept that we live in a market economy? If there was a market for liberal radio you can bet corporate America would have it on the air. In fact they tried Air America and it failed. So now there are people pushing for the government to interfere. Besides, they have NPR, and no one listens.

2007-07-02 05:20:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

People seem to sterotype in a bad way about Muslim people, when almost always the bad terrorist actions are from Muslim extremists.

2007-07-02 05:19:23 · 18 answers · asked by michiganfan 3

Explain simply please?

2007-07-02 05:06:12 · 13 answers · asked by worried person 1

Many people hear "Universal Health Care" and think Sen. Clinton. But Republicans such as Mitt Romney and Huckabee are in favor of it, and it's being discussed on a bipartisan level. It seems to be almost inevitable, no matter which party wins the White House.

How do you feel about UHC? Do you think we can examine the problems in other country's systems and avoid them here?

http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/poll-shows-many-republicans-favor-universal-healthcare-gays-in-military-2007-06-28.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/opinion/polls/main2528357.shtml

2007-07-02 05:01:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I will say right now that the people who choose to vote for the corporate puppets in either party are brain weak. The media is owned by the big businesses who control the Democrat and Republican Parties, so they naturally have an easy time supporting their minions by manipulating the dumbed down American public and avoid covering the Libertarians, which nobody notices and some of the brainwashed take it for that Libertarians are radicals. I vote Libertarian because they are against the crooks that run both parties and one of the best candidates in 2008, Ron Paul, used to be a Libertarian. He is against the IRS, which pisses on our money and steals from us because most Americans are too stupid and weak to care and do something and he is for restoring all of our Constitutional rights, which the bastards running the government have taken away. I know he will not win, but he is better than the other pathetic jokes running in 2008.

2007-07-02 05:00:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

We went to war in Afganistan, not to find kick out the Taliban, but to build a natural gas pipline. (Fahrenheight 9/11)

Bush knew about 9/11 in Advance and let it happen so he could feed his cronies big fat military contracts when we went to war.

Rich Gannon, ex QB for the Raiders I think, had a gay relationship with President Bush.

DIEBOLD stole the Election. Black boxes converted all the Kerry votes into Bush votes. ( Funny how Kerry or Edwards never say this or how this wasn't a problem in 2006 because the democrats won).

Rove is the man behind the Curtain. He outed the CIA Desk Jockey, He provided Dan Rather with the Bogus Bush Awol documents. He told Gonzales to fire the 11 federal presecutors (Clinton fired 92), or whatever the Rove conspiracy Da Jour is. There are thousands!

Building # 7 fell because of Expolsives. Again 9/11 inside Job!

Republicans suppres the Black vote in Florida in 200!

JFK was killed by the Government, Cuba, Mob

2007-07-02 04:57:37 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since some are to poor to buy the cd or have cable I will try to explain .
Its world in which you are watched 24 hours a day . Your phones tapped and a police state in charge of every thing .
No more crime or terrorism and also all freedom gone . You wake to work and serve the Police state .
Books , paintings ,music, is censored and banned by the authorities for your own good .
Many people are very happy with this and many are not .
I see this as our future . Cameras on all corners , phones tapped , and television spitting out propaganda like fox news already does all day .
A police state and more prisons , a bigger military and more spending on it . Heavy taxes to pay for all this protection and control to prevent a bomb from killing a few thousand people while enslaving everyone .
I see conservatives leading us down this path .
They always say if you have nothing to hide, are not breaking the law, then why worry about your phones or records being reviewed . This scares me .

2007-07-02 04:56:21 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

will the cons and right question why their exalted leader spent a trillion dollars fighting the wrong war instead of securing our borders or will they blame the left and liberals?

2007-07-02 04:52:12 · 15 answers · asked by JF 3

fedest.com, questions and answers