English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We went to war in Afganistan, not to find kick out the Taliban, but to build a natural gas pipline. (Fahrenheight 9/11)

Bush knew about 9/11 in Advance and let it happen so he could feed his cronies big fat military contracts when we went to war.

Rich Gannon, ex QB for the Raiders I think, had a gay relationship with President Bush.

DIEBOLD stole the Election. Black boxes converted all the Kerry votes into Bush votes. ( Funny how Kerry or Edwards never say this or how this wasn't a problem in 2006 because the democrats won).

Rove is the man behind the Curtain. He outed the CIA Desk Jockey, He provided Dan Rather with the Bogus Bush Awol documents. He told Gonzales to fire the 11 federal presecutors (Clinton fired 92), or whatever the Rove conspiracy Da Jour is. There are thousands!

Building # 7 fell because of Expolsives. Again 9/11 inside Job!

Republicans suppres the Black vote in Florida in 200!

JFK was killed by the Government, Cuba, Mob

2007-07-02 04:57:37 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

Maybe liberals love conspiracies because the divert attention form their lack of any ability to solve problems. When was the last time you saw a liberal solve a problem.

2007-07-02 05:04:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Its likely that the black vote in Florida was suppressed by various ppl in Florida, ie Gov. Jeb Bush, and company.
Going to war to help out military contracts? Oh come on!!!!
Maybe the other one that was possible was that Bush KNEW an attack was likely.
lol, we know an attack is coming now. This isn't a conspiracy. There was never a conspiracy there, h3ll, the US intel community knew an attack was coming even before January 2000, however, the American public didn't care. And still doesn't. I am afraid we won't, until its too late. Lol, we have too many people busting the mob, and catching child predators, and not enough catching insane jihadists. And trust me, you can't use a white middle aged mafioso type to infiltrate a Pakistani cell in Cleveland.
By the way, do those cameras speak Arabic. Burp. Geeez these people are stupid.
The cameras are stopping jaywalking, and speeders, and anti-government dissent. And then every once in a while, AFTER a terrorist attack, they will be used by by CSI Miami to convict a terrorist.
The problem with that is, that after the nuke, there won't be any CSI Miami left. Or CSI departments in NYC or DC.
Geeez.

2007-07-02 05:18:15 · answer #2 · answered by fields r 2 · 0 1

First of all it was Jeff Gannon not Rich Gannon, As for the voting irregularities. "DELAND, Fla., Nov. 11 - Something very strange happened on election night to Deborah Tannenbaum, a Democratic Party official in Volusia County. At 10 p.m., she called the county elections department and learned that Al Gore was leading George W. Bush 83,000 votes to 62,000. But when she checked the county's Web site for an update half an hour later, she found a startling development: Gore's count had dropped by 16,000 votes, while an obscure Socialist candidate had picked up 10,000--all because of a single precinct with only 600 voters."
- Washington Post Sunday , November 12, 2000 ; Page A22
That election was key to set everything in motion. This last election was inconciquential (losing an insignificant battle allows you to win the big war). Some Americans blame Bush supporters for alleged voting irregularities at some Florida polling places on Election Day which many African-American voters said systematically deprived them of their right to vote. (I included an Archive link of the protests on Bush's innauguration (rememeber that, he had to get back into his car because of the riots)
"Earlier this month, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission heard complaints Thursday from black voters in Florida who said they were wrongly turned away from the polls. Many complained that they were intimidated by police roadblocks or found their names wrongly stricken from voting rolls."
If you still don't believe Karl Rove excercises power in this administration and government then youare a blind fool, who doesn't want to believe the truth. Building #7 how else could it have fallen like it did at 5:25 that evening when the buildings around it sustained heavier damage and remained standing. The owner even said in an interview that they made the decision to "pull" the building, to intentionally bring it down. it takes two weeks to set explosives for a controled demolition. E-Howard Hunt recently confessed to knowledge and involvement in the JFK assasination: "E. Howard scribbled the initials "LBJ," standing for Kennedy's ambitious vice president, Lyndon Johnson. Under "LBJ," connected by a line, he wrote the name Cord Meyer. Meyer was a CIA agent whose wife had an affair with JFK; later she was murdered, a case that's never been solved. Next his father connected to Meyer's name the name Bill Harvey, another CIA agent; also connected to Meyer's name was the name David Morales, yet another CIA man and a well-known, particularly vicious black-op specialist. And then his father connected to Morales' name, with a line, the framed words "French Gunman Grassy Knoll."
So there it was, according to E. Howard Hunt. LBJ had Kennedy killed. It had long been speculated upon. But now E. Howard was saying that's the way it was. And that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the only shooter in Dallas. There was also, on the grassy knoll, a French gunman, presumably the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in other assassination theories."

2007-07-02 05:28:25 · answer #3 · answered by Myles D 6 · 0 1

You sound like a terrorist. The CIA provides their lives to guard u . s . a .. Hates terrorists. Worships the Christian God. And has taken an Oath to guard u . s . a . from the likes of you. Enemies of u . s . a . help BO to smash the CIA. Our substantial source of intelligence against the rabid terrorists who're plotting and scheming to smash u . s . a . has been the CIA. There seems to be important help by ability of the liberals, now pronounced as 'progressives', for this subversive action. in actuality, progressives are little greater effective than a 'new call' for commie tyrants who've crawled out from below the rocks to pal around with BO. Their usual 'substitute' demands destruction of the US shape and our two hundred years of freedom.

2016-10-19 01:39:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I supppose that the the non-existant 'liberals' can be guilty of anything you accuse them of. The 'strawman' argument has been very useful to the reactionaries that hijacked the GOP. First you redefine the word 'liberal', then you accuse this strawman of all kinds of crimes. The object here is to get the opposition to defend the strawman. Nice try, but but it doesn't work. Since there is no such a critter and all of its words are placed in its mouth and all of its supposed actions are made up what is there to 'defend'? Nothing. Making up or exaggerating words and deeds is a lot easier than defending or even explaining the really serious errors, mistakes and incompetence of the Bush Junta. Folks, when you read 'questions' such as the one posed above, remember, it's all propaganda, disinformation and misdirection...don't fall for it!

2007-07-02 05:08:53 · answer #5 · answered by Noah H 7 · 2 3

You forgot
"Liberals also believe President Bush redirected Katrina so it can hit New Orleans."

how about "President Bush and GOP controlled the price of Gasoline just before 2006 election."

2007-07-02 05:02:03 · answer #6 · answered by Samm 6 · 9 2

you are a very silly person with a very bad hair cut.
you should find another hobby.

you wasted a lot of time on that crap-ola above and it's not even a real question.

you'll give best answer to the red state goofball that kisses your rear end the best

2007-07-02 05:22:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

If yuo doubt the influence of Rove, you don't know what is going on.

The Black vote WAS suppressed in Florida. Not the first time a Southern state resorted to tricks and gimmicks to do so, hopefully it will be the last.

2007-07-02 05:03:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

Ever think that there would be less conspiracies if our President and VP didn't try to hide things from people? Without the truth being told, we are left to make crap up.

2007-07-02 05:03:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

The one that says that congressmen Jefferson of Louisiana is not guilty of fraud and embezzlement.

2007-07-02 05:03:04 · answer #10 · answered by meathead 5 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers